Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01002230201812 Apr 2018
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 12 Apr 2018 · CNR MHCC010022302018

Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: Ch.s.304/18 Suit 4028/13 1
CNR.NO.MHCC010022302018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.304 OF 2018
IN
SUIT NO.104028 OF 2013
M/s.Choksey Chemicals Private Limited .. .. Plaintiff
Versus
M/s.Progressive Construction Ltd. & others . ...Defendants
Advocate Shri. Satyadev Joshi for Plaintiff.
Coram : Her Honour Judge
Smt. Pushpa N. Rao
Ad hoc Asstt.Judge
CR no. : 32
Dated : 12th April,2018
ORDER
1. Plaintiff taken out this chamber summons for substitute service
through paper publication.
2. Plaintiff has filed the present suit against defendant Nos. 1 to 5. Writ
of summons by registered post was duly served on defendant No.1, 3,4 but
writ of summons against defendant No.2 and 5 not served. Defendant No.2
and 5 are residing on the address as mentioned in the title clause of the
plaint are at Hyderabad Andhrapradesh. Therefore, the writ of summons in
the name of defendant No.2 and 5 is required to be served through paper
publication in the ‘Free Press Journal’ being the national newspaper and
‘Inadu’ being the regional newspaper of Andhrapradesh.
-- 1 of 3 --
Ch.s.304/18 Suit 4028/13 2
3. Plaintiff had taken out application vide Exh.8 for substitute service
against defendant Nos.1,3 & 4 that application was allowed , but after perusal
of the track report of the register post, it found that writ of summons is
served on defendant Nos. 1,3 & 4 but inspite of service defendant No.1,3 & 4
not appeared before the court. As it was wrongly mentioned in the
application vide Exh.8 for substitute service against defendant Nos.1,3 & 4.
Therefore, learned advocate for the plaintiff submitted that plaintiff be
allowed to withdraw application vide Exh.8.
4. In view of above discussion, I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Chamber Summons No.304 of 2018 is made absolute
in terms of prayer clause(a),(b)&(c).
Date : 12/04/2018 (Pushpa N. Rao)
Ad hoc Asstt.Judge
Bombay City Civil Court
Greater Mumbai
Dictation Direct typed on computer: 12/04/2018
Signed by HHJ on : 12/04/2018
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED
JUDGMENT/ORDER”.
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
26/04/2018 at (11.10 p.m.) Mrs. J.V.Pawar
Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt.Pushpa N Rao C.R.No.32
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ORDER
12/04/2018
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 12/04/2018
JUDGMENT/ ORDER uploaded on 26/04/2018
-- 2 of 3 --
Ch.s.304/18 Suit 4028/13 3
.
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.