CHAMBER SUMMONS
Manohar Pandurang KoliVsMCGM
CNR MHCC0100222720198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Fort, City Civil Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 17th June 2019
TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100439/2019
- Registration Date
- 27 Feb 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
- 1MCGM
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 03-04-2019 Business: Adv. Mr. B.P. Shukla for Plff present and tendered original registered Ch/s No.439/19 alongwith affidavit. Adv. Mrs. Bhoir for MCGM/deft. present and given reply on overleaf of Ch/s No.439/19. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date. Adjd to 17/6/2019 for Ch/s hearing and N/M hearing. Next Purpose: C/S HEARING Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2019 Date: 17-06-2019 Business: Adv. B. P. Shukla for plaintiff present. Adv. Khandagle for Deft./MCGM present. KB Perused the Ch/s no. 439/2019 and Ch/s reply thereto. The plaintiff wants to bring on record subsequent events by way of Ch/s. Hearing of the suit has not yet commenced. The proposed amendment is necessary for deciding the controversy between the parties. Hence the Ch/s is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment be carried out in plaint accordingly on or before next date and copy of amended plaint be served to the defendant. Adjd to 19.07.2019 for compliance. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 17-06-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 102460/2019 Filing Date: 27-02-2019 First Hearing Date: 03rd April 2019 Decision Date: 17th June 2019 Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 117 Jun 2019
17 Jun 2019
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Dt 17/06/2019 SU 1317/16 CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. C. V. MARATHE (C.R.NO.08) Adv. B. P. Shukla for plaintiff present. Adv. Khandagle for Deft./MCGM present. KB Perused the Ch/s no. 439/2019 and Ch/s reply thereto. The plaintiff wants to bring on record subsequent events by way of Ch/s. Hearing of the suit has not yet commenced. The proposed amendment is necessary for deciding the controversy between the parties. Hence the Ch/s is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment be carried out in plaint accordingly on or before next date and copy of amended plaint be served to the defendant. Adjd to 19.07.2019 for compliance. Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
