Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 21 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010022142020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM 837-20 in St. No. 2361-2020 CNR NO.MHCC01-002214-20 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 837 OF 2020 IN L.C. (STAMP) NO. 2361 OF 2020 Mr. Mohd. Naseem A. Samad Quareshi …...Plaintiff Versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai ...... Defendants Coram : Sanjay N. Yadav, Judge (Court Room no. 05) Date : 21st February,2020. Appearance: Ld. Adv. Mr. Tabish Mooman for the plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mrs. Rawade for defendant/MCGM. ORDER 1. The plaintiff by this notice of motion seeks temporary injunction restraining the defendant corporation from acting upon the Notice dated 25.01.2020 issued under Section 351 of the MMC Act. 2. Heard Learned Advocate for the plaintiff and Learned Advocate for the defendant corporation. 3. The schedule of the Notice dated 25.01.2020 reads as under: ‘’ Unauthorized construction of structure comprising of Ground Floor (adm. 9.00 mt. X 3.03 mt. X 2.0 mt. in height) + Mezzanine + 1st Floor (adm. 9.0 mt. x 5.0 mt. X 5.05 mt. in height) made up with Brick -- 1 of 4 -- 2 NM 837-20 in St. No. 2361-2020 Masonry Walls, ladi coab slab over M.S. Angle and A.C. Sheet roof at Room No. 13/C/1, Ground Floor, New Dawood Baug, Shuklaji Street, Grant Road (E), Mumbai-08 without obtaining permission from the competent authority of M.C.G.M. as shown in red colour in sketch.’’ 4. The plaintiff had replied the notice on 30.01.2020. It is observed in the order that the plaintiff had not replied the notice. The plaintiff had produced the acknowledgment of receipt of reply by corporation. The defendant corporation is expected to consider the reply and pass speaking order. The plaintiff to approach the Corporation by 26.02.2020. The corporation to consider the reply and pass orders at the earliest. In case of adverse order against plaintiff, the defendant corporation not to take any coercive action for period of two weeks from date of the order. It would be at the discretion of the defendant corporation to provide personal hearing of the plaintiff. The Notice of Motion No. 837/2020 stands disposed off. Noting survives in the suit (stamp). The Suit (Stamp) No. 2361/2020 also stands disposed off. In the result, following order is passed. ORDER 1. The defendant corporation is directed to consider the reply of the plaintiff in relation to the notice issued under Section 351 of the MMC Act. 2. The plaintiff is at liberty to file additional reply and additional documents if he so desires. 3. The plaintiff to approach the defendant corporation by 26.02.2020. 4. The defendant corporation to consider the reply of the plaintiff and thereafter to pass speaking orders. 5. In case of adverse order against plaintiff, the defendant corporation not to take any coercive action for period of two weeks from date of -- 2 of 4 -- 3 NM 837-20 in St. No. 2361-2020 the order. 6. It would be at the discretion of the defendant corporation to provide personal hearing of the plaintiff. 7. The Notice of Motion No. 837 of 2020 as well as Suit (Stamp) No. 2361 of 2020 stands disposed off. (Sanjay N. Yadav) Judge, Date : 21.02.2020 City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated on : 21.02.2020 Transcribed on : 24.02.2020 Signed by HHJ on : 27.02.2020 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 NM 837-20 in St. No. 2361-2020 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 27.02.2020 at 5.18 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. K.S.Bhosale Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. Sanjay N. Yadav C.R. no. 05 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 21.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 27.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 27.02.2020 -- 4 of 4 --
