Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 28 Aug 2021 · CNR MHCC010022092019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: 1 MHCC010022092019 Presented on : 19122018 Registered on : 15022019 Decided on : 28082021 Duration : Y M D 2 6 13 BEFORE THE CITY CIVIL COURT, MUMBAI ( Court No.14 ) (Presided Over by S. U. Hake) COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.980 OF 2021 (SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO.413 OF 2019 ) Ex.13 Harakchand Vora ] carrying on business under the name ] and Style Vardhaman Kids Wear ] Having its office at : ] 1/24, Shree Building, ] Ranade Road, Dadar(West), ] Mumbai400 028 ] ..Plaintiff Versus Tafia Dresses ] Having its office at ] Shop No.4, Anjuman Complex ] Opp. K.B.N. Hospital ] Gulbarga585 102, Karnataka ] ..Defendant Ld. Advocate Gaurav Pandey plaintiff. DefendantEx parte. JUDGMENT (Dated 28/08/2021) 1. Suit is for recovery of Rs.16,06,216/with interest @ -- 1 of 5 -- 2 18% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. Briefly stated, plaintiff's case, is as under: Plaintiff is in the business of manufacturing and trading of kids garments. Defendant is engaged in the business of clothing and garments. In December2015, defendant contacted plaintiff and placed orders for supply of kids wear. As per work orders, plaintiff supplied garments to defendant during the period from 13/01/2016 to 24/06/2016. Plaintiff pleaded in details regarding invoices raised during this period. 3. It is further contended that defendant received goods alongwith invoices without raising any dispute regarding quality of the goods and amounts set out in the invoices. Defendant failed to make the payment as per invoices raised by the plaintiff. Therefore, plaintiff send notice dated 26/11/2018 through advocate to the defendant making demand of the suit amount. Defendant refused to take the notice. Defendant failed to make the payment of the goods supplied by the plaintiff. Hence, this suit. 4. Summons were duly served to defendant by RPAD as per service affidavit(Ex.5). Inspite of service of summons, defendant failed to tender his appearance before the Court. Therefore, as per order dated 23/07/2019, suit proceeded exparte. 5. Following points arise for determination, findings thereon for the reasons to follow are as under: -- 2 of 5 -- 3 Sr.No. Points Findings 1. Does the plaintiff prove that an amount of Rs.16,06,216/ is outstanding against the defendant? Proved 2. What order? Suit is decreed as per final order. REASONS Point No.1 6. In order to substantiate the claim, plaintiff filed his evidence affidavit (Ex.6). He testifies that defendant placed orders regarding supply of kids wear. He supplied kids wear to defendant as per orders placed by the defendant during the period from 13/01/2016 to 24/06/2016. PW1 Harakchand Vora deposed in detail regarding the dates and amounts of invoices. The invoices raised by plaintiff are collectively marked as Ex.8. 7. As stated supra, defendant failed to contest the suit. The evidence adduced by plaintiff remain unchallenged and unrebutted. The oral evidence of PW1 Harakchand Vora finds requisite support from the invoices (Ex.8 colly). From the evidence adduced by the plaintiff, it can be inferred that he supplied goods of worth Rs.10,42,998/to the defendant, but, defendant failed to make payment of those goods. As per statement of claim (Ex.11), plaintiff claimed interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of invoice. As per invoices raised by plaintiff, interest at the rate of 24% is payable on failure to make payment within 30 days. However, plaintiff claimed interest at -- 3 of 5 -- 4 the rate of 18% p.a. The interest rate claimed by the plaintiff is less than the agreed rate of interest. Present transaction being commercial transaction, plaintiff is entitled to claim interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of invoices till the date of the suit. Plaintiff claimed amount of Rs.16,06,216/. As discussed supra, plaintiff's evidence remained unchallenged and therefore plaintiff is entitled to this amount. Point No.1 answered accordingly. In the result, following order: ORDER 1. Suit is decreed with costs. 2. Defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.16,06,216/ (Sixteen Lakhs Six Thousand Two Hundred and Sixteen only)alongwith interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of the suit till it's realization to plaintiff within two months of this order. 3. Decree thus follow. 28/08/2021 S.U.HAKE JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT, GR.MUMBAI. Dictated on : 28/08/2021 Transcribed on : 28/08/2021 Signed on : 28/08/2021 -- 4 of 5 -- 5 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER”. 28/08/21 at 05.30 pm. Mrs.Tanushree C.Kamble Name of the Judge HHJ SHRI SU Hake Date of Pronouncement of judgment/order 28/08/21 Judgment and order signed by P.O. 28/08/21 Judgment/order uploaded on 28/08/21 -- 5 of 5 --
