Date: 28-02-2020
Business: Plaintiff and advocate absent.
Adv. Ms. Jamila Khan for defendant present.
Adv. Mr. Suryavanshi/Nandanwar for MCGM/deft present.
Adv. Mr. U. V. Singh for defendant present.
Plaintiff to say on notice of motion no.805/2020. Matter is adjd to 08/04/2020 for say n.m. no.805/2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2020
Date: 08-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2020
Date: 20-04-2020
Business: COVID-19. Lockdown from 23.03.2020. Hence matter adjourned to 30.05.2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 30-05-2020
Date: 30-05-2020
Business: In view of extension of Lockdown period pursuant to the declaration of Novel Corona Virus (Covid-19) as global pandemic by WHO and as per Office Order 78 of 2020, matter adjourned
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2020
Date: 17-06-2020
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 28-07-2020
Date: 28-07-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 11-09-2020
Date: 11-09-2020
Business: None present for Plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
Matter adjourned for reply to 28.09.2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 28-09-2020
Date: 28-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2020
Date: 17-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2020
Date: 06-11-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2020
Date: 04-12-2020
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv Nandanwar/Suryawanshi present for MCGM/defendant.
Matter adjourned for reply to 17.12.2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2020
Date: 17-12-2020
Business: Adv Kavita Pandey present for plaintiff.
Adv Rawade (h/f) present for MCGM/defendant.
Order below NM No.805/2020 (in Roznama)
Defendant No.4 submitted this NM for condonation of delay of 46 days in filing WS. The NM is supported with affidavit of defendant no.4. It is contend that she is doing job and having minor daughter. She was under financial problems and was unable to engage advocate. She could not provide instructions and documents to concern lawyer within stipulated period. Hence she prayed for condonation of delay.
Adv of plaintiff submitted reply on the last page of NM itself. She has strongly opposed the application but in the alternative prayed for cost.
Adv of defendant no.4 is absent. Heard Adv of plaintiff.
Considering the above mentioned grounds it appears that defendant no.4 has demonstrated sufficient cause. However for causing said delay it would be justifiable to impose reasonable cost, by considering financial condition of defendant no.4.
Considering peculiar facts and circumstances I pass the following order-
1. The NM No.805 of 2020 stands allowed subject to cost Rs.600 payable to plaintiff towards said delay.
2.After payment of cost defendant no.4 submit WS and the same shall be exhibited accordingly.
3. Defendant no.4 to avoid delay in compliance on next date (After getting knowledge of this order).
4. NM No.805 of 2020 stands disposed off.
Matter adjourned for compliance to 11.01.2021.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 17-12-2020
