Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Vardisingh Kishansingh Rajput alias ShankarbhaiVsJivraj Laxman Solanki

CNR MHCC0100216820192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 13th August 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100839/2019
Registration Date
26 Feb 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 27-02-2019
    Business: Adv. Bharat Kothari for Plaintiff present.
    Ex.2 Adv. Sawant filed V/n for Defendant t.o.r.
    Original NM No.839/19 tendered by Adv for Plaintiff t.o.r.
    Reply filed by Defendant t.o.r.
    Copy given to other side.
    Adv for Defendant made statement that Plaintiff is in possession and Defendant will not interfere with plff\''s possession without following due process of law.
    In view of this statement, there is no need to pass any order in relation to ad interim.
    Deft appeared. Adv for Defendant waived the service of writ of summons.
    Plff is directed to supply copy of plaint alongwith compilation to the Defendant.
    Adj for NM hearing and WS to 12.04.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 12-04-2019
    
    Date: 12-04-2019
    
    Date: 14-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Bharat Kothari for Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Puranik for Defendant present.
    Defendant present.
    Defendant tendered original NM No.2083/19 t.o.r.
    Say filed by Plaintiff on NM No.2083/19.
    Order below NM No.2083/19.
    Read Notice of Motion, affidavit in support of it, say of Plaintiff. Heard respective counsel for parties.
    Notice of motion is taken out by defendant for grant of permission to file written statement and to condone the delay caused in filing the same.
    Plaintiff opposed notice of motion on the count that there is delay in filing notice of motion and if allowed, it may be subject to cost.
    It is not in dispute that Adv for defendant waived service of writ of summons on 27.02.2019. Defendant failed to file written statement within prescribed time. It is contended that delay was occurred due to personal difficulties, he has good chances to succeed on merits.
    It is a settled law that Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC is not mandatory and in specific circumstances the WS can be accepted with reasons. It is also held that in an adversarial system, no party should be denied an opportunity in participation of the justice dispensation system (Salem Bar Association V/s Union of India (2003 AIR SCC 189) and Zolba V/s Keshav (2008 AIR SCC 2099).
    Keeping in view above legal position and reason assigned by the defendant, it is not just to deprive defendant from contesting the matter on merits. The delay caused is not inordinate and deliberate. Therefore, I am inclined to condone the delay caused in filing written statement and permit him to file written statement. However, considering the conduct of defendant, it is necessary to impose certain costs upon him. Hence, pass following order.
    ORDER
    1. Notice of Motion NO.2083/19 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/-(Rupees One thousand only) to the plaintiff within period of one week. Defendant is at liberty to deposit costs payable to the plaintiff in Court.
    2. On payment of costs the defendant has to file written statement within a period of one week.
    Accordingly, NM No.2083/19 is disposed off.
    Adj for compliance to 22.07.2019.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2019
    
    Date: 22-07-2019
    Business: Adv. Jayesh Rajput for Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Puranik for defendant present.
    Pursis filed by Adv for defendant to treat preliminary reply and written statement as reply to NM No.839/19 t.o.r.
    Heard arguments of both sides on NM No.839/19.
    Earlier order, if any to continue till next date.
    Adj for NM order to 01.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 01-08-2019
    
    Date: 01-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Bharat Kothari for Plaintiff present.
    Son of defendant present.
    Adv. Puranik for defendant present.
    As Court is busy in dictating orders in other matters, hence adj for NM order to 13.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2019
    
    Date: 13-08-2019
    Business: Plff and Adv absent.
    Deft and Adv absent.
    K.B.
    L.O.
    Defendant present.
    Adv. Sawant for defendant present.
    FRSR following order is passed in NM No.839/19.
    ORDER
    1. Notice of Motion No.839 of 2019 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
    2. Costs will be the cause in the suit.
    3. Accordingly, notice of motion is disposed off.
    Adj for directions to 21.09.2019.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 13-08-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102417/2019
    Filing Date: 26-02-2019
    First Hearing Date: 27th February 2019
    Decision Date: 13th August 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    13 Aug 2019

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM No.839/2019 ..1.. Suit No.398/2019 CNR No.MHCC010021682019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.839 OF 2019 IN SUIT NO.398 OF 2019 Vardisingh Kishansingh Rajput @ Shankarbhai .. Plaintiff Versus Jivraj Laxman Solanki .. Defendant Mr. Jayesh Rajput & Mr. Bharat Kothari, advocate for plaintiff Mr. J.M. Puranik, advocate for defendant CORAM : M. T. ASIM, J COURT ROOM NO.02 DATED : 13th August, 2019 ORAL ORDER Notice…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.