Full Order Text
Order 1 · 24 Nov 2025 · CNR MHCC010021652018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010021652018 Presented on 12/02/2018 Registered on 17/02/2018 Decided on 24/11/2025 Duration 07Y: 09M: 12D Exhibit 26 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MAZGAON, MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO.227 OF 2018 M/s. J.K. Dall Mill ] A proprietorship concern, through ] its proprietor Mr. Kishore Morarji ] Chheda an adult Indian Inhabitant ] aged about 64 years, having shop No. 1, ] Veer Apartment, CHS, Opposite Somaiya ] College, Rajawadi, 7th Road, ] Ghatkoper(East), Mumbai-400 077. ]... Plaintiff V/s. ] Mr. Harshvardhan Parikh ] An adult Indian Inhabitant aged ] about 43 years, residing at B-3, ] Mahavir Smruti, Plot No, 122/123, ] Garodia Nagar, Ghatkopar (E), ] Mumbai- 400 077. ]... Defendant Appearance:- Ld. Advocate Sanjay Chaturvedi for the plaintiff. Ld. Advocate Asha Shah for defendant. CORAM : HHJ SHRI SANGRAM SHRIHARI SHINDE C. R. NO. : 81 DATE : 24/11/2025 -- 1 of 11 -- 2 SUM SU NO.227/2018 JUDGMENT ( Dictated and pronounced in open Court) 01] This suit is filed under Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (C.P.C.), by the plaintiff for recovery of amount of Rs. 95,41,703/- along with further interest from defendant. Brief facts of plaintiff’s case may be summarized as under: 02] As per the plaintiff, it is a sole proprietor and carrying on business of selling grains, pulses and dry fruits etc. Defendant is an individual and carries his business in dry fruits and grains. As per purchase order placed by the defendant, plaintiff used to supply goods to the defendant. Accordingly, plaintiff has supplied goods to the defendant between 16/03/2012 to 06/06/2012, total amounting to Rs.64,19,275/-. The plaintiff has raised 40 invoices against said delivery of goods on the defendant. Further, the defendant had issued 34 cheques towards security against delivery of said goods. The plaintiff requested defendant to pay the outstanding amount however, defendant was avoiding to pay the said amount. Therefore, plaintiff lodged complaint on 10/10/2014 at Tilak Nagar Police Station, Ghatkopar against the defendant. Thereafter, defendant agreed that he will pay amount within two months however, even after lapse of six months, defendant failed to pay the outstanding amount. Therefore, again on 07/02/2015 plaintiff lodged complaint against defendant. Thereafter, defendant requested to plaintiff to withdraw the complaint and issued three cheques of Rs. 20,00,000/-, Rs. 20,00,000/- and Rs. 24,20,000/-. Further, on depositing said cheques in the bank it were returned with remark, "insufficient funds". Therefore, plaintiff issued demand notice dated 09/06/2015 to the defendant u/s. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and called upon to pay outstanding amount. The defendant given -- 2 of 11 -- 3 SUM SU NO.227/2018 false reply to the said notice on 04/07/2015 and contended that he has paid an amount of Rs.32,00,000/- on 09/03/2015 and Rs. 32,20,000/- on 13/03/2015 in cash. As defendant failed to make the payment, plaintiff has lodged criminal complaint bearing No. 918/SS/215, u/s. 138 of N.I. Act against defendant. Thus, the defendant is liable to pay an amount of Rs. 64,20,000/- towards principal and 18% p.a. interest thereon, total amounting to Rs. 95,41,703/- alongwith further interest. Hence, this suit. 03] Defendant appeared in the matter. Thereafter, plaintiff has taken out Summons for Judgment No.137/2018, which came to be dismissed on 29/06/2024 and defendant was granted conditional leave to defend the suit with direction to depositing 50% of principal amount within 60 days. Defendant has failed to comply the said order. The plaintiff has filed Non Deposit Certificate vide Exh. 10. Defendant had challenged said order before Hon'ble High Court vide Writ Petition No.12012/2024, wherein time was extended to deposit amount as per order dated 06/01/2025. However, defendant failed to deposit amount and plaintiff has filed non-deposit certificate vide Exh.10 on record. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled for judgment as per Order 37, Rule 3(6) (b) of C.P.C. 04] The plaintiff has relied on following documents vide List Exh. 8. Sr. No. Exhibit Particulars 1 Exh.8/1 to Exh.8/3 Security Cheque No.100423, Security Cheque No.100425, Security Cheque No.100426, 2 Exh.8/4 to Exh. 8/43 Invoice No.41932 of Rs.1,28,638/- dated 16/03/2012, Invoice No.41999 of Rs.2,67,310/- -- 3 of 11 -- 4 SUM SU NO.227/2018 dated 21/03/2012 ,Invoice No.42000 of Rs.2,82,550 dated 23/03/2012, Invoice No.42020 of Rs.1,21,000/- dated 25/03/2012, Invoice No.42042 of Rs.1,81,525/- dated 26/03/2012, Invoice No.42049 of Rs.213,918/- dated 27/03/2012, Invoice No.42053 of Rs.3,412/- dated 29/03/2012, Invoice No.42073 of Rs.2,13,000/-dated 30/03/2012, Invoice No.42078 of Rs.1,24,700/- dated 31/03/2012, Invoice No.42121 of Rs.1,33,148/- dated 31/03/2012, Invoice No.42122 of Rs.2,40,000/-dated 03/04/2012, Invoice No.42125 of Rs.3,400/-dated 03/04/2012, Invoice No.42134 of Rs.2,54,400/- dated 04/04/2012, Invoice No.42139 of Rs.1,94,750/- dated 04/04/2012, Invoice No.42152 of Rs.32,914/- dated 05/04/2012, Invoice No.42198 of Rs.1,84,300/- dated 10/04/2012, Invoice No.42199 of Rs.1,58,150/- dated 10/04/2012, Invoice No.42313 of Rs.2,07,000/- dated 11/04/2012, Invoice No.42314 of Rs.1,57,500/- dated 11/04/2012, Invoice No.42216 of Rs.1,98,440/- dated 12/04/2012 ,Invoice No.42222 of Rs.39,900/- dated 14/04/2012, Invoice No.42246 of Rs.3,60,400/- dated 18/04/2012, Invoice No.42247 of Rs.53,250/- dated 17/04/2012, Invoice No.42266 of Rs.1,71,067/- dated 19/04/2012, Invoice No.42269 of Rs.64,200/- dated 20/04/2012 ,Invoice No.42277 of Rs.99,080/- dated 20/04/2012, Invoice No.42360 -- 4 of 11 -- 5 SUM SU NO.227/2018 of Rs.2,59,400/- dated 25/04/2012, Invoice No.42361 of Rs.1,88,993/- dated 26/04/2012, Invoice No.42381 of Rs.101,120/- dated 28/04/2012, Invoice No.43033 of Rs.2,12,000/- dated 30/04/2012, Invoice No.43034 of Rs.1,07,100/- dated 03/05/2012, Invoice No.43056 of Rs.2,12,000/- dated 04/05/2012, Invoice No.43077 of Rs.60,000/- dated 08/05/2012, Invoice No.43103 of Rs.2,34,400/- dated 10/05/2012, Invoice No.43108 of Rs.1,52,900/- dated 11/05/2012, Invoice No.43142 of Rs.75,200/- dated 15/05/2012, Invoice No.43158 of Rs.1,35,200/- dated 17/05/2012, Invoice No.43184 of Rs.89,150/- dated 19/05/2012, Invoice No.43385 of Rs.3,30,000/- dated 21/05/2012, Invoice No.43401 of Rs.1,74,000/- dated 06/06/2012. 3 Exh.8/44 Complaint addressed to Tilak Nagar Police Station dated 11/10/2014. 4 Exh.8/45 Complaint addressed to Tilak Nagar Police Station dated 17/02/2015. 5 Exh.8/46 Cheque No.100488 for Rs. 20,00,000/- drawn on Jankalyan Sahakari Bank Ltd. Ghatkopar (E) branch dated 20/03/2015 6 Exh.8/47 Cheque No.100487 for Rs. 20,00,000/- drawn on Jankalyan Sahakari Bank Ltd. Ghatkopar (E) branchdated 31/03/2015 7 Exh.8/48 Cheque No.100510 for Rs. 24,20,000/- drawn on Jankalyan Sahakari Bank Ltd. Ghatkopar (E) branch dated 08/04/2015 -- 5 of 11 -- 6 SUM SU NO.227/2018 8 Exh.8/49 to Exh.8/52 Four Cheques Return Memo IDBI Bank for cheque No. dated 28/05/2015. 9 Exh.8/53 Notice issued to defendant dated 09/06/2015 10 Exh.8/54 Postal Acknowledgment Card 11 Exh.8/55 Defendant’s Reply to Notice dated 04/07/2015 12 Exh.8/56 Criminal Complaint u/s. 128 of N. I. bearing No.918/SS/2015 dated 30/07/2015. 05] Further, on perusing contentions of the plaintiff and documents on record, following points arose for my consideration, to which my findings are recorded for reasons given below. Sr. No. Points Findings 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.95,41,703/- from the defendant? If yes, at what rate of interest ? Yes, the plaintiff is entitled for simple interest on Rs. 64,20,000/- at the rate of 7% p.a. from 12/02/2018 i.e. the date of filing the suit till its full realization from the defendant. 2. What order and decree? As per final order. R E A S O N S As to Points No. 1 and 2 :- 06] Perused plaint, oral and documentary evidence on record. Heard Ld advocate for the plaintiff. As per plaintiff, defendant is engaged in business of buying and supplying grains, pulses and dry fruits at address mentioned in the title cause. Defendant approached in the year 2009 to the plaintiff for the first time for supplying said goods and then became regular customer. Defendant used to deal in cash. In the month of March, 2012 defendant started asking delivery of goods on credit basis and to give assurance of payment, he issued three -- 6 of 11 -- 7 SUM SU NO.227/2018 cheques bearing No.100423, 100425 and 100426 respectively as a security. Plaintiff has filed said cheques on record vide List Exh. 8/1 to 8/3 to support its contention. Further, plaintiff used to supply goods to the defendant on credit basis and defendant used to issue post dated cheque to the plaintiff. Further, plaintiff sold, supplied and delivered goods to the defendant between 16/03/2012 to 06/06/2012 and raised 40 Invoices for total amount of Rs. 64,19,275/-. Defendant to pay said amount issued 34 cheques. The plaintiff has filed photocopies of Invoices on record vide List Exh. 8/4 to 8/43, therefore, it cannot be considered in evidence. The plaintiff has not filed copies of said 34 cheques on record to support its contention. 07] It is the contention of the plaintiff that he did not deposit the said cheques as defendant had assured that he will pay amount in cash. Further, defendant failed to pay outstanding amount for a period of one year therefore, plaintiff had lodged complaint on 10/10/2014 with Tilak Nagar, Police Station, Ghatkopar, Mumbai against defendant. Defendant was called upon in pursuant to the said complaint and he assured that he will pay outstanding amount within two months. Plaintiff has filed office copy of said complaint on record vide List Exh. 8/44 to support its contention. However, defendant failed and neglected to make the payment therefore, plaintiff filed complaint against defendant on 07/02/2015 at Tilak Nagar Police Station, Ghatkopar. Plaintiff has filed office copy of said complaint vide List Exh. 8/45 to support its contention. Further, it is the contention of the plaintiff that to discharge his liability thereafter, defendant issued three cheques of Rs. 20,00,000/-, 20,00,000/- and 24,20,000/- respectively in favour of plaintiff bearing No. 100488 dated 20/03/2015, No. 100487 dated 31/03/2015 and No.100510 dated 08/04/2015. The said -- 7 of 11 -- 8 SUM SU NO.227/2018 cheques when deposited for encashment, same were dishonured for reason, “funds insufficient”. The plaintiff to support its contention has filed said original cheques and cheques return memo on record vide List Exh. 8/46 to 8/52. As cheques issued by the defendant were dishonoured, plaintiff issued notice on 09/06/2015 u/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and called upon defendant to make payment of Rs. 64,20,000/- along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. thereon. The said notice was sent by RPAD and it is received by the defendant. Plaintiff has filed office copy of said notice and original postal receipt and AD card on record vide List Exh. 8/53 and 8/54. Defendant replied the said notice on 04/07/2015 with false contention that he has paid an amount of Rs. 32,00,000/- on 09/03/2015 and Rs. 32,20,000/- on 13/03/2015 in cash. Plaintiff has filed photocopy of said notice on record vide List Exh. 8/55. It is pertinent to note that it being photocopy, it cannot be considered in the evidence. Further, defendant has failed to bring any material evidence on record to show that he had paid an amount of Rs. 64,00,000/- in cash to the plaintiff. If defendant had paid said amount to the plaintiff then he would not have issued cheques thereafter to the plaintiff. Further, plaintiff filed criminal complaint bearing No.918/SS/2015 against defendant for dishonor of said cheques. Plaintiff has filed photocopy of said complaint on record vide List Exh. 8/56. Thus, it appears that plaintiff has proved by oral and documentary evidence that they had supplied goods of Rs. 64,19,275/- to the defendant during March 2012 to June 2012. Further, to pay the said amount defendant had issued three cheques and which were dishonored for reasons, “funds insufficient”. It is pertinent to note that defendant has not contested the matter therefore, evidence of plaintiff has remained unchallenged. Even otherwise, defendant has not complied order dated 29/06/2014 passed in -- 8 of 11 -- 9 SUM SU NO.227/2018 Summons for Judgment No. 137/2018. Therefore, I am of the view that plaintiff has proved and he is entitled for an amount of Rs. 95,41,703/- including interest at the rate of 18% p.a. 08] So far as, further interest is concerned plaintiff has claimed interest at the rate of 18% p.a. on Rs. 64,20,000/-. However, I am of the view that the same is excessive as compared to the rate of interest of the Nationalized Banks. Therefore, having regard to the provision of section 34 of the C.P.C., I am of the view that granting the interest at the rate of 7% p.a. on the principal amount would be just, proper and reasonable. Hence, I hold that the plaintiff is entitled to interest at the rate of 7% p.a. on the principal amount, from the date of filing the suit till its full realization. It is submitted by the plaintiff that order for attachment of property of defendant be passed. The plaintiff has to bring sufficient material on record that defendant is disposing his property in order to frustrate decree. However, plaintiff has not made out any such case and to pass order of attachment before judgment. Therefore, plaintiff is not entitled for such relief at this stage. Hence, I answer point No.1 in affirmative and in answer to point No. 2, I proceed to pass following order :- O R D E R 1) Summary Suit No.227 of 2018 is hereby decreed with costs. 2) The defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.95,41,703/- (Rupees Ninety Five Lakhs Forty One Thousand Seven Hundred and Three only) to the plaintiff. 3) The defendant shall pay the plaintiff simple interest on Rs.64,20,000/- at the rate of 7% p.a. from 12/02/2018, the date of filing of the suit, till its full realization. -- 9 of 11 -- 10 SUM SU NO.227/2018 4) The plaintiff may be entitled to get refund the court fees paid, if provided for in the Rules. 5) The decree be drawn up accordingly. (Sangram S. Shinde) Adhoc Judge, City Civil Court Mazgaon, Mumbai. Date: 24/11/2025 Court Room No.81 Dictated on:24/11/2025 Corrected and signed on:25/11/2025 -- 10 of 11 -- 11 SUM SU NO.227/2018 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 26/11/2025 Mrs. V. V. Malgaonkar Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri S. S. Shinde C.R. No.81 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 24/11/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P. O. on 25/11/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 26/11/2025 -- 11 of 11 --
