Vinodsingh devsunder Singh +17 moreVsMCGM +2 more

Date: 26-02-2020
Business: NOB.TOB.By precipe.
Adv. Mohhamad Rao for plaintiff present and tendered draft NM along with affidavit in support. Leave to register is granted for NM and also tendered affidavit in service  and compilation of  citations. Copies are served to other side.
Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present and tendered compilation of documents.t.o.r. and marked at Exh-2.copy is served to other side.
Mrs.Priti Rao Sr.Inspector \''M\'' west ward (Encroachment renewal )MCGM is present.
Partly heard by both sides on ad-interim relief.
 Matter adjd to 28.02.2020 at 12.30pm for ad-interim hrg.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2020

Date: 28-02-2020
Business: Adv.Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present and filed compilation of document. t.o.r. Exh-3.
Mrs. Priti Rao Inspector (Encroachment and renewal ) M/West Ward MCGM   is present.
Heard both side.
 Matter adjd to 06.03.2020 at 12.30pm for Ad-interim hrg.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2020

Date: 06-03-2020
Business: Adv. Manmohan  Rao for plaintiff present and tendered additional affidavit of plaintiff in support of NM and written submission in NM,t.o.r. Copies are supplied to other side.
Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present.
Mr.Suhas Kadam  Sr.Insp.(License)M/West Ward present.
Mrs.Priti Rao Sr.Insp.(Encroachment Dept.) M/West Ward present.
Heard both sides on Ad-interim reliefs.
Parties to maintain status quo.
 Matter adjd to 14.03.2020 for order on Ad-interim reliefs.
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 09-03-2020

Date: 09-03-2020
Business: NOB.TOB.By precipe.
Adv. Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present.
Heard both side.
Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present on his request time is extended to register the NM.
 Matter already adjd to 14.03.2020 for order on ad-interim.
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 14-03-2020

Date: 14-03-2020
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present and tendered original
N/M. No. 1069/2020 along with affdvt. in support. T.O.R.
None for Defendant.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter adjd to 21/03/2020 for clarification/order.
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2020

Date: 21-03-2020
Business: Adv. Shri Manmohan Rao for Plaintiff present.
None for Defendant/MCGM.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
In view of Hon\''ble High Court Circular on Corona epidemic,
matter adjd for clarification/order on 01.04.2020
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2020

Date: 01-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2020

Date: 16-04-2020
Business: In view of declaration of Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) as global pandemic by WHO and Office Order No.77 of 2020 matter adjourned.
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 27-05-2020

Date: 27-05-2020
Business: In view of extension of Lockdown period pursuant to the declaration of Novel Corona Virus (Covid-19) as global pandemic by WHO and as per Office Order 78 of 2020, matter adjourned
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2020

Date: 12-06-2020
Business: Adjd
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2020

Date: 19-08-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2020

Date: 23-09-2020
Business: As per direction of Hon\\\\\\\''ble High Court , due to heavy rain, holiday is
declared on 23.09.2020 and matter is adjd to 09.11.2020
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2020

Date: 21-10-2020
Business: None for Plaintiff.
Adv. Mr.  Khandagale for Defendant/MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter adjd to 04/11/2020 for clarification/ order on ad-interim relief.
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2020

Date: 04-11-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao for Plaintiff present filed pursis, t.o.r.
and marked as Exh.4. Copy is served to other side.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for Defendant/MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter adjd to 14/12/2020 for clarification/ order on ad-interim relief.
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2020

Date: 14-12-2020
Business: Adv. Mr.Manmohan for plaintiff present.
Adv. Khandagale for deft/MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter adjd to 03/02/2021 for Clarification/ Ad-interim order.
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 03-02-2021

Date: 03-02-2021
Business: Adv. Vaishali Bhikule h/f Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Khandagle for deft/MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter adjd to 12/02/2021 for Clarification/Ad-Interim order.
Next Purpose: AD-INTERIM ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2021

Date: 12-02-2021
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Khandagle for deft/MCGM present.
Officer, Mr. D.V. Patil, Sr. Inspector (Encroachment), M-West Ward, MCGM, present and submitted that our department has uploaded list of vendors on the website of MCGM. As per the survey made out in 2014, the people who are eligible as a license vendor and their names will be uploaded on the website of MCGM.
Officer submitted that hawking zone policy is in process. Till decision of policy order on ad-interim relief may be kept in abeyance. He further submitted that BMC would submit reply on pursis filed by advocate for plaintiff. He again request to kept order on ad-interim relief in abeyance till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter adjd to 19/04/2021 for Reply on pursis by deft/MCGM.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2021

Date: 19-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 03-05-2021

Date: 03-05-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2021

Date: 23-06-2021
Business: Matter pertains to C.R.No,8.
Advocate Mr. Manmohan Rao for the plaintiff present.
Advocate Mrs. Tondwalkar for the Defendants/MMC present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd to 14.07.2021 for reply on pursis by defendants/MMC.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 14-07-2021

Date: 14-07-2021
Business: Due to Covid-19 pandemic
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 18-08-2021

Date: 18-08-2021
Business: CORAM  H.H.J. D. D. ALMALE, (C.R.NO.06)
(Matter pertains to C.R. No. 08)
Adv. Vaishali Bhilare h/f. Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Tonwalkar for defendant No.1 and 2/MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. To 17-09-2021 for NM Reply.
                                                                                In-charge Judge
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2021

Date: 17-09-2021
Business: Adv Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv Smita Chavan h/f Adv Mrs Tondwalkar for defendant/ MCGM present and requests for time to file reply to NM. Time is granted till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. To 22/10/2021 for reply on pursis by defendant / MCGM.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2021

Date: 22-10-2021
Business: Adv Manmohanrao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for Defendant/MCGM is present and requests for time to file reply to NM.
Time is granted till next date.
Mrs Sangita Dani, Sr Inspector License, M/West Ward, MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. To 29/11/2021 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2021

Date: 29-11-2021
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiffs present.
Adv. Tondwalkar for MCGM/defendant present and requested time to file reply on NM. Time is granted to file reply as a last chance.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd to 14/1/2022 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2022

Date: 14-01-2022
Business: In view of office order no.7/2022 dated 07.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dated 06.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases (all variants) and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned without passing any adverse order against the party/s.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 11/02/2022 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 11-02-2022

Date: 11-02-2022
Business: In view of office order no.7/2022 dated 07.01.2022 and Office order No. 22/2022 dated 28.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dated 06.01.2022 and 27.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases (all variants) and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned without passing any adverse order against the party/s.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd to 28/03/2022 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 28-03-2022

Date: 28-03-2022
Business: Adv Vaishali Bhikule h/f/ Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Smita Chavan h/f Adv. Tondwalkar for defendant/   MCGM present and request for filing reply to NM. Time is granted till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. To 08-07-2022 for NM reply
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2022

Date: 08-07-2022
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant/ MCGM is present and requested time to file reply on N/M. Time is granted till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 30/07/2022 for N/M reply (morning session).
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 30-07-2022

Date: 30-07-2022
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant/ BMC is present and requested time to file reply on N/M. Time is granted till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 12/09/2022 for N/M reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 12-09-2022

Date: 12-09-2022
Business: Adv. Vaishali Bhikule h/f Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant/ BMC is present and requested time to file reply to N/M. Time is granted till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 12/10/2022 for N/M reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2022

Date: 12-10-2022
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant/ BMC is present and requested time to file reply to N/M. Time is granted till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 19/10/2022 for N/M reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2022

Date: 19-10-2022
Business: Adv. Sarika Gawde h/f Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant/ BMC is present and tendered reply to N/M and compilation of documents, TOR. Compilation of documents marked as Exh.5. Copies are supplied to other side.
Adv. for plaintiff requested time to argue on N/M. Time is granted till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 28/11/2022 for N/M hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2022

Date: 28-11-2022
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present and requested time to argue on N/M. Time is granted till next date.
None for defendant/ BMC.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 23/01/2023 for N/M hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-01-2023

Date: 23-01-2023
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant/ BMC is present.
Due to paucity of time, matter is adjourned.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 17/02/2023 at 12.30 p.m. for N/M hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2023

Date: 17-02-2023
Business: Adv. Vaishali Bhikule i/b Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present and submitted that Adv. on record is at Pune hence, requested time to argue N/M. Time is granted till next date.
Adv. Mr. Suryavanshi for defendant/ BMC is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 22/02/2023 (afternoon session) for N/M hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2023

Date: 22-02-2023
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mr. Suryavanshi for defendant/ BMC is present.
K.B.
L.O.
Same appearance.
Heard partly Adv. for plaintiff on N/M.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 04/03/2023 at 11.00 a.m. for N/M P/H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2023

Date: 04-03-2023
Business: At 11.00 a.m.
None for plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. Suryavanshi for defendant/ BMC is present.
K.B.
L.O.
Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present and requested time to argue on N/M. Time is granted till next date.
Rest of the same appearance.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 03/04/2023 for N/M P/H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2023

Date: 03-04-2023
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff is present.
Adv. Suryavanshi for defendant /BMC is present.
As court is busy in dictating judgment in Suit no. 796/2012 and other NM and ad-interim orders, due to paucity of time, matter is adjourned till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. To 03/05/2023 for NM hearing P.H..
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 03-05-2023

Date: 03-05-2023
Business: Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mr. Suryavanshi for defendant/ BMC is present.
Due to paucity of time, matter is adjourned till next date.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 16.06.2023 for N.M. P.H..
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2023

Date: 16-06-2023
Business: Advocate  Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Due to paucity of time matter adjourned.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd to15.07.2023 at Morning session for NM Hearing /NM P.H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 15-07-2023

Date: 15-07-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Mhatre h/f Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Heard argument of advocate for plaintiff in NM No. 1792/18 and adjourned for argument of corporation on request 21.07.2023
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd to 21.07.2023 at Morning session  for argument of defendant/BMC/NM P.H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 21-07-2023

Date: 21-07-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Partly heard Adv.for Defts/BMC on NM.
On oral request of Adv. for Defts/BMC, matter is adjd.
Earlier Order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd to 07/08/2023 at 1.00 p.m. for further hearing on NM (PH).
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2023

Date: 07-08-2023
Business: Advocate Vaishali Bhikule h/f Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi  for defendant/BMC present and requested for adjournment. Granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd  to 25.08.2023      for  further hearing on NM (PH).
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 25-08-2023

Date: 25-08-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan  Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi  for defendant/BMC present and tendered compilation of documents marked as Exh.5  copy is supplied to other side.
Partly heard argument of advocate for defendant/BMC and matter adjourned further argument of defendant/BMC and he is directed to submit detail report whether plaintiff are eligible or not under street vendors Act.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd to 15.09.2023 for further argument of defendant/BMC on NM./P.H
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 15-09-2023

Date: 15-09-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi  for defendant/BMC present and submitted that he is going to file affidavit which has been sent to approval and seeks time. Hence matter adjourned
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd  to  29.09.2023   for N.M P.H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2023

Date: 29-09-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present
Advocate Suryavanshi  for defendant/BMC present.
Heard adv for deft/BMC. Matter adjourned for rejoinder argument on request of Adv for plaintiff.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd  to 20.10.2023 at 1 “O” clock  for  Rejoinder argument of plaintiff in NM/NM P.H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 20-10-2023

Date: 20-10-2023
Business: At 1.00 pm.
None present for plaintiff
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
kb
L.O. 1.40 p.m
Adv. Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd to 30.10.2023 at 1.00 p.m for  further rejoinder argument by plaintiff/ N.M P. H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2023

Date: 30-10-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi  for defendant/BMC present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd  to  04.11.2023 at Morning session  for   NM.P.H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2023

Date: 04-11-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Heard argument of both sides on Notice of Motion’
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd  to 22.11.2023 for NM Hearing ( Written Synopsis)
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2023

Date: 22-11-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present and tendered written argument in NM TOR, And marked as Exh. 6.  Copy is supplied to other side.
Advocate Suryavanshi  for defendant/BMC present and requested for time to argue on NM. Granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd  to  06.12.2023   for  defendant Argument/NM.P.H.
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 06-12-2023

Date: 06-12-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao  for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Heard further argument of Adv for both the parties on NM.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd  to 21.12.2023  for NM Order
Next Purpose: NM  P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 21-12-2023

Date: 21-12-2023
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi h/f Mhatre  for defendant/BMC present.
As Court is busy in dictating order in  NM No. 2171/19, hence matter adjourned
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd  to 06.01.2024  for NM Order
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2024

Date: 06-01-2024
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Suryavanshi  for defendant/BMC present.
F.R.S.R following order is passed on Notice of Motion No. 1069/2020
ORDER
Notice of Motion is dismissed.
Adv for plaintiff tendered application for extension of ad-interim protection below Exh. 7
Adv. for deft/BMC has given say on Exh. 7  overleaf.
Heard argument of both sides on Exh. 7
Order on Exh. 7
1. The plaintiff has filed this application for continuation of ad-interim protection for six weeks to enable the plaintiff to challenge order dismissing NM, before Hon’ble High Court.
2.   Defendant/ BMC opposed application
3.   Heard Advocates for the parties and perused record and proceeding.
4.  The appeal is statutory right of the aggrieved parties. The Advocate for plaintiff submitted that plaintiff intends to challenge the order dismissing NM and some time is required to file appeal. In the meantime, interim protection is not extended, BMC will take action and obstruct plaintiff from carrying there business and in that event object of filing appeal would be defeated. Adv for plaintiff submitted that  ad-interim protection was continue during pendency of NM.  Therefore considering the submission made by Ld. Advocate for plaintiff and fact of the case I pass following order.
ORDER
Ad-interim protection extended till four weeks from the date of uploading order.
Adv for deft/BMC submitted that NM reply be treated as WS.  O- Allowed
Exh. 8 Written statement.
Adjd  to  02.03.2024 for hearing on issues
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2024

Date: 16-02-2024
Business: Not on Board Taken on Board  By praecipe
Exh. 9 Production praecipe
Advocate Manmohan Rao  for plaintiff present and tendered application for extension for stay marked as Exh. 10.
Advocate Suryavanshi  for defendant/BMC present and has given say on Exh. 10 overleaf
Heard argument of both sides on Exh. 10.
Order on Exh. 10
1. The plaintiff has filed this application for extension for Earlier order for period of one week stating that Appeal has been filed, however it is circulated on 21.02.2024 and earlier order is expired today.
2.   Defendant/ BMC opposed application
3.   Heard Advocates for the parties and perused record and proceeding.
4. Notice of Motion has been disposed of on 06.01.2024 and Earlier order was extended for period of four weeks. It is submitted by plaintiff that he has filed Appeal but it is circulted next week and meantime there is possibility of implementation of notice and eviction of the plaintiff. So he prayed for continuation of earlier order for one week. Hence I pass following order -
ORDER
Earlier order to continue for one week.
Adjd  to 02.03.2024  for Hearing on issues
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2024

Date: 02-03-2024
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present and submitted Appeal before Hon’ble Bombay High Court against NM is posted on 10.04.2024.
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Adjd  to 20.04.2024  for framing of issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2024

Date: 20-04-2024
Business: Advocate Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present and submitted that Appeal from Order  is pending and matter is adjourned to 19.06.2024 and requested to keep the matter after said date. Hence matter adjourned.
Advocate Mhatre for defendant/BMC present.
Adjd  to 24.04.2024    for framing issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2024

Date: 24-04-2024
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Adjd  to  28.06.2024    for framing issues
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2024

Date: 28-06-2024
Business: Advocate Shilpa Naik h/f Manmohan Rao for plaintiff present.
Advocate Vyawahare for defendant/BMC present.
As Court is busy in High Court Time bound matter suit NO. 875/12 to 887/12, hence matter adjourned.
Adjd  to 20.07.2024  for framing issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 20-07-2024

Date: 20-07-2024
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Waghmare h/f Botlawar for defendant/BMC present.
As Court is busy in Urgent matter, hence matter adjourned.
Adjd  to 21.09.2024     for framing issues
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2024

Date: 21-09-2024
Business: PO is on leave, hence board is discharged and matter is adjourned
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2024

Date: 05-10-2024
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI S.H. SALUNKHE ( C.R. No. 04 )
None present for plaintiff
Advocate  Nagarthawar   for defendant/BMC present.
As Court is busy in judgment in suit No. 1514/2015 and ad-interim order, hence matter adjourned.
Adjd  to   19.10.2024  for  framing of issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2024

Date: 19-10-2024
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI S.H. SALUNKHE ( C.R. No. 04 )
None for plaintiff.
Advocate Pooja Nagarthawar for defendants/BMC present.
As Court is busy in order in Ch/s No. 68/2024 and Ch/s 66/2024 and in NM No. 1386/23. Hence due to paucity of time matter adjourned.
Adjd  to 16/11/2024 for framing of issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2024

Date: 16-11-2024
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI S.H. SALUNKHE ( C.R. No. 04 )
None present for plaintiff
Adv. Santosh Yadav  for defendant/BMC  present.
As Court is busy in Targeted matter and judgment in Suit No. 1908/2016 and 1909/2016. Hence matter adjourned.
Adjd  to 07.12.2024   for framing of issues
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2024

Date: 07-12-2024
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Honmane   for defendant/BMC present.
As Court is busy in Targeted matters, hence matter adjourned
Adjd  to 18.01.2025   for Framing issues
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 18-01-2025

Date: 18-01-2025
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. A.G. SANTANI (C.R. No. 04)
None present for the plaintiff. Adv. Mr. Swapnil Bharti h/f Adv. Ms. Sujata Puri for defendant/MCGM is present.
Adjourned for framing of issues to 07.04.2025.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 07-04-2025

Date: 07-04-2025
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. A.G. SANTANI (C.R. No. 04)
Adv. Ms. Vijayavati i/b Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao  for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Ms. Sujata Puri for defendant/MCGM is present. The Court is busy in recording evidence in suit No. 747/2011 (Old and targeted suit).
Adjourned for framing of issues to 16.07.2025.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 16-07-2025

Date: 16-07-2025
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 12-09-2025

Date: 12-09-2025
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. MR. AMIT A. LAULKAR (C.R. No. 04)
The plaintiff is present in person.
Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao a/w Adv. Ms. Manjula Chigari, Adv. Ms. Vijayvati Jaiswar for the plaintiff is present and filed application for seeking clarification/better perticulars from defendant/MCGM. Taken on record. It is marked as Exhibit 11. O- Other side to say.
Adv. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
Adjourned for filing say on Exhibit 11 to 06.10.2025.
Next Purpose: FILING SAY
Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2025

Date: 06-10-2025
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. A. K. KALE (C.R. No. 04)
Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao a/w Adv. Ms. Vijayvati Jaiswar for the plaintiff is present
Adv. Ms. Sangita Honmane for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file say on Exhibit 11.
Adjourned for filing say on Exhibit 11/RE to 07.11.2025
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2025

Date: 07-11-2025
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. A. K. KALE (C.R. No. 04)
Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao a/w Adv. Ms. Vijayvati Jaiswar for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Ms. Rupali Patil h/f Adv. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
later on at 2.49 pm
Adv. Ms. Vyavhare for the defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file reply to Exhibit 11. Granted.
Adjourned for filing say on Exhibit 11/RE .to  17.12.2025
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2025

Date: 17-12-2025
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. A. K. KALE (C.R. No. 04)
Adv. Manjula Chigar h/f Adv. Manmohan Rao for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
keep back
Later on at 3.00. p.m
None present for the plaintiff.
Rest appearance is as above.
Adv for defendant/MCGM filed handwritten reply to Exhibit 11
Adjourned for Hearing on Exhibit 11.to  30.01.2026
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 30-01-2026

Date: 30-01-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR(C.R. No. 04)
Adv. Ms. Manjula Chigari h/f Adv. Manmohan Rao for the plaintiff is present and seeking time for argument. O- Granted.
Adv. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
Adjourned for Hearing on Exhibit 11.to 13.02.2026
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-02-2026

Date: 13-02-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR (C.R. No. 04)
Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao for the plaintiff is present and filed
Adv. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
Heard argument of both sides on Exhibit 11
Adjourned for Order on exhibit 11 to 16.03.2026.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2026

Date: 16-03-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR (C.R. No. 04)
Adv Manjula Chigari i/b Adv. Manmohan Rao for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Ms.Sheetal Waghmare h/f Adv. Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
Order on Exhibit 11

1.	Plaintiff has filed this application requesting to direct the defendant(BMC) to give clarification on implementation of street vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014.
2.	According to him, the said Act came in to force in the Maharashtra on 01.04.2014. Subsequently, there are various order of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 224/2013 and 657/2017, wherein, guidelines have been given for implementation of the Act. Subsequently, Government Resolution also came to be passed on 21.10.2013, which clarifies that the existing street vendors shall be allowed to operate till exercise of registration and creation of vending zones completed. In the light of above guidelines, it requires clarification from the defendant regarding the implementation of Street Vendors Act.
3.	As against, BMC has given reply and resisted the same, saying that, the present application is not maintainable in the eyes of law. After dismissal of the Notice of Motion, plaintiff has challenged the Order in the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. In the said Appeal, the present defendant already filed reply. Plaintiffs have very well know that, various proceeding are pending before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court to that effect, therefore, this application would not be tenable. Thus, it may be dismissed.
4.	Heard argument. Perused record.
5.	It appears, plaintiffs are seeking directions against the BMC to clarify implementation of Street Vendors Act.
6.	It appears, plaintiff had filed Notice Motion No. 1069/2020 for seeking direction against the BMC that, not to dispossess to the plaintiffs from carrying business on street under the Street Vendors Act. It came to be dismissed on 06.01.2024. After dismissal of NM, they preferred an Appeal before Hon’ble Bombay High Court and simultaneously filed this application asking clarification of implementation of Street Vendors Act.
7.	I am of view that, to ask clarification on the implementation of Street Vendors Act is a General Phenomenon. If plaintiffs are claiming their specific relief against the BMC, that would be dealt with in accordance's with law. However, claiming clarification on the implementation of Street Vendors Act at public large would not be tenable before this Court, because, it falls clarification in general sense and not a specific claim. They have not claimed specific relief that to do or not to do. Therefore, the relief which they claim can not be granted. Hence, application Exhibit 11 stands dismissed.
Adjourned for draft issues to 24.06.2026
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2026

Date: 24-06-2026
Business: CORAM - H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR (C.R. No. 04)
Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
Adjourned for draft issue to 31.08.2026
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 31-08-2026

Date: 31-08-2026
Business: CORAM H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR (C.R. No. 04)
Adv. Mr.Manjula Chigari h/f Adv. Mr. Manmohan Rao for the plaintiff is present and filed
draft issues. Taken on record
Adv. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
Adjourned for framing of issues to 28.10.2026
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 28-10-2026

NOTICE OF MOTION/101069/2020

Registration Number: 100543/2020
Transfer Date: 07-03-2022
From Court: 8 - COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
To Court: 4 - COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Filing Number: 102286/2020
Filing Date: 18-02-2020
First Hearing Date: 26th February 2020
Court Number And Judge: 4-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE