Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 11 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010021592019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 Order on C/S.422-19 in Su.No.273-14 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT MUMBAI. ORDER ON CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.422 OF 2019 (CNR No. MHCC01-002159-2019) IN S.C. SUIT NO. 273 OF 2014 Mr. Ramesh Damodar Vaity ]...Plaintifs Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ]...Defendants ============================================================ Appearances:- Ld. Advocate Mr.Suraj Kudalkar for the Plaintif. Ld. Adv. Mrs. Pratibha Gavhane a/w Adv. Mrs. Hajare for defendant/MCGM. ===================================== CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI U.J. MORE (Court Room no. 8) DATED : 11th February, 2020 ORDER ON CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.422 OF 2019 1. This Chamber Summons taken by the plaintif to carry out amendment/consequential amendments to the plaint. 2. Defendant Corporation has fled reply, objected to the Chamber Summons. It is contended that plaintif is trying to fll up lacunas in plaint. The documents fled by the plaintif -- 1 of 5 -- 2 Order on C/S.422-19 in Su.No.273-14 is intending to add to plaint were available with the plaintif at the time of fling suit. 3. Heard Adv.Mr. Suraj Kudalkar for the plaintif. He pithily submitted that suit structure is slum. The letter sent to the Collector dated 10.05.1976, the letter sent to the corporation dated 18.12.1987 were not in possession with the plaintif when suit was fled. The documents were with his brother with whom his relations was not good in the year 2019. One more suit was pending between their family in Court No.03. Being suit No.1328 of 2017. During the mediation between the parties his brother handover these documents. These documents are important to demolish the case of defendant corporation. 4. It is admitted fact, the suit is fled in 2014 by challenging Notice under section 351 of MMC Act. These documents is very important to prove plaintifs case. In these documents are nothing but correspondence of collector and corporation itself. These documents inserted by the way of amendment. The body of plaint certain is not change nature and character of suit. 5. Heard both the sides. 6. I would like to focus a light on the provision of order 6 rule 17 of CPC. “Amendment of pleadings – The Court may at any stage of the -- 2 of 5 -- 3 Order on C/S.422-19 in Su.No.273-14 proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties: Provided that no application for amendment shall be allowed after the trial has commenced, unless the Court comes to the conclusion that in spite of due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial.” 7. It is observed by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Writ petition No. 2897 of 2006 on dated 20.10.2006. “The courts while deciding he application for amendment should not adopt a hyper-technical approach. Liberal approach should be the general rule particularly in case where the other side can be compensated with the costs. Amendment need to be allowed to avoid uncalled-for multiplicity of litigation.” 08. Thus, if plaintif wants to make the amendment on the subsequent act of the corporation i.e. defendant which is -- 3 of 5 -- 4 Order on C/S.422-19 in Su.No.273-14 consequential. It will not change the nature and character of the suit. Hence, I proceed to pass following order: O R D E R 1. Chamber summons No.422 of 2019 in terms of prayer clause (a) is made absolute. 2. Plaintif to carry out amendment within two weeks. 3. Chamber Summons No.422 of 2019 is disposed of accordingly. (U.J. More) Judge, Date : 11.02.2020 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai Dictated on : 11.02.2020 Transcribed on : 12.02.2020 Signed by HHJ on : 12.02.2020 -- 4 of 5 -- 5 Order on C/S.422-19 in Su.No.273-14 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 14.02.2020 at 11.00 a.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mr.G.R.Suryawanshi Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. U.J.More. C.R. no.08 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 11.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 12.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 14.02.2020 -- 5 of 5 --
