Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Vilas Chandrakant GaokarVsState of Maharshtra +5 more

CNR MHCC0100213820188-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 07th July 2022

TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102262/2019
Registration Date
08 Aug 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    7

    Petitioner

    1. 1Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar

    Respondent

    1. 1State of Maharshtra
    2. 2The Collector
    3. 3The Tahsildar
    4. 4Lokmanya Mulitpurpose CHSL
    5. 5High Power Committee
    6. 6The MHADA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec O 1 · R 1 · S 26

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 29-08-2019
Business: Adv. Ms. Mahamuni for the Plaintiff present.
None present  for the Defendant.
As court is busy hearing arguments execution application and   N/M and dictating orders.
Hence, matter is adjd. to 12.12.2019
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2019

Date: 12-12-2019
Business: Adv. Nikita Panhalkar for Plaintiff is present.
Issue writ of summons through bailiff of Sheriff office and simultaneously through RPAD or  speed post.
Matter is adjd. for service  to 11/03/2020.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2020

Date: 11-03-2020
Business: None present  for the Plaintiff.
None present  for the Defendant.
Matter is adjd. to 4.07.2020 for proof of service of writ of summons.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2020

Date: 04-07-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2020

Date: 01-10-2020
Business: Due to lockdown because of Covid-19, board is discharged and as per SOP only urgent matters are taken up.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2021

Date: 29-01-2021
Business: Both the parties and their advocates are absent.
Matter is adjd. to 15/04/2021 for proof of service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2021

Date: 15-04-2021
Business: Due to covid-19
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 12-07-2021

Date: 12-07-2021
Business: due to covid-19
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2021

Date: 16-09-2021
Business: None present for Plaintiff.
None present for Defendant.
As plaintiff and his adv. absent and adv. for defendant also absent hence, and adv. for defendant also absent Matter is adjd. to 10/12/21 for proof of service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2021

Date: 10-12-2021
Business: None present.
Matter is adjd. to 02.03.2022 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2022

Date: 02-03-2022
Business: (As per order of Hon\''ble Principal Judge dtd.25/2/22, matter is reassigned to this court.)
None present for plaintiff.
None present for deft.
It appears that since long the plaintiff did not tender affidavit of service nor taken steps for service of writ of summons.
Hence matter adjd for service/order to 19/4/22.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2022

Date: 19-04-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
As both the parties and their advocates are absent,  Matter adjourned for dismissal order to 07/07/22.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 07-07-2022

Date: 07-07-2022
Business: Matter was called at 11.00 AM.
None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
KB
LO at 3.51 pm
None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
From the record it appears that, plaintiff and his Adv are absent since long and did not take steps to proceed further with the suit and for service of writ of summons. Therefore matter is kept for dismissal order. Today also plaintiff and his advocate are absent. From the above conduct of the plaintiff, it appears that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with the suit. Therefore, it will be appropriate to dismiss the suit as per Order 9 Rule 3 Of Code Of Civil Procedure. Hence, suit is dismissed as per Order 9 Rule 3 Of Code Of Civil Procedure. Proceeding is closed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 07-07-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102274/2018
Filing Date: 09-02-2018
First Hearing Date: 29th August 2019
Decision Date: 07th July 2022
Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    07 Jul 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0102262/2019
Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar Vs State of Maharshtra
Date : 07-07-2022
Business : Matter was called at 11.00 AM. None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant. KB LO at 3.51 pm None
present for plaintiff. None present for defendant. From the
record it appears that, plaintiff and his Adv are absent since
long and did not take steps to proceed further with the suit
and for service of writ of summons. Therefore matter is
kept for dismissal order. Today also plaintiff and his
advocate are absent. From the above conduct of the
plaintiff, it appears that plaintiff is not interested to proceed
further with the suit. Therefore, it will be appropriate to
dismiss the suit as per Order 9 Rule 3 Of Code Of Civil
Procedure. Hence, suit is dismissed as per Order 9 Rule 3
Of Code Of Civil Procedure. Proceeding is closed.
Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED
Disposal Date : 07-07-2022
COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    07 Jul 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0102262/2019
Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar Vs State of Maharshtra
Date : 07-07-2022
Business : Matter was called at 11.00 AM. None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant. KB LO at 3.51 pm None
present for plaintiff. None present for defendant. From the
record it appears that, plaintiff and his Adv are absent since
long and did not take steps to proceed further with the suit
and for service of writ of summons. Therefore matter is
kept for dismissal order. Today also plaintiff and his
advocate are absent. From the above conduct of the
plaintiff, it appears that plaintiff is not interested to proceed
further with the suit. Therefore, it will be appropriate to
dismiss the suit as per Order 9 Rule 3 Of Code Of Civil
Procedure. Hence, suit is dismissed as per Order 9 Rule 3
Of Code Of Civil Procedure. Proceeding is closed.
Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED
Disposal Date : 07-07-2022
COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.