Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 08 Aug 2019 · CNR MHCC010021312018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.561 OF 2018 IN S.C.SUIT NO.3346 OF 2009 (HIGH COURT SUIT NO.8489 OF 2009) (CNR No.MHCC010021312018) Brig. Narayan Nayak (Retired) ...Applicant/Defendant Mrs. Rukmini Bhuyan Shah ...Plaintiff Versus Brig. Narayan Nayak (Retired) ... Defendant CORAM: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI K.P.NANDEDKAR (COURT ROOM NO.9) DATE : 8th August, 2019 Adv. Mr. M.D.Pandey for plaintiff. Adv. Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi for Defendant. ORDER 1. This Notice of Motion is taken out by defendant for setting aside no cross order dated 07.12.2017 passed by this Court against defendant. This Notice of Motion is taken out by defendant and in its support his advocate on record Mr. Heeralal Chaturvedi, has filed his affidavit and contended that, in between 06/12/2017 to 13/12/2017, he was at New Delhi for attending the matter from Hon'ble Apex Court. On 07/12/2017, the suit was before this, on that day Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi has filed an application 9A of Code of Civil Procedure. However, Court has passed “no cross” order against defendant. According to advocate Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi, no cross order is necessary to be set aside. Advocate Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi has filed on record Railway Ticket, Air Ticket obtained by him for going to the -- 1 of 4 -- :2: NM.561/18 IN SUIT3346/2009 hon'ble Apex Court. Therefore, Mr. Heeralal Chaturvedi, accordingly taken out Notice of Motion is made absolute. 2. Plaintiff Mrs. Rukmini Bhuyan Shah has resisted Notice of Motion, by filing her affidavit and reply and contended that this Notice of Motion is taken out with intention to delay the matter. It is further contended that the, plaintiff is not knowing that defence advocate was out of station or not. Hence, plaintiff has prayed to dismiss the Notice of Motion. 3. Heard Ld. Advocate Mr. Heeralal Chaturvedi for defendant and Ld. advocate Mr. M.D.Pandey for plaintiff. It is pointed out by plaintiff's advocate that this Notice of Motion is not filed by defendant, but, it is filed by defendant's advocate and therefore according to the plaintiff's advocate, Notice of Motion is necessary to be dismissed as advocate Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi is not party to the suit, but he is advocate for the defendant. In reply advocate Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi submitted that he has filed this Notice of Motion as facts mentioned in affidavit filed in support of Notice of Motion are known to advocate Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi only. I have given serious consideration to arguments advanced. Even, though facts mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of Notice of Motion are known to advocate Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi only, advocate Mr.Heeralal Chaturvedi was not excepted to file this Notice of Motion as, he is not party to this suit. On hearing the argument, it is noticed by me that defendant is intending to get set aside the no cross order passed against the defendant. However, as this Notice of Motion is not filed by the defendant, prayer made in Notice of Motion can not be granted. It is made clear, if defendant himself will file the Notice of Motion for prayer made in this Notice of Motion, it can -- 2 of 4 -- :3: NM.561/18 IN SUIT3346/2009 be considered on merits by giving opportunity to plaintiff to reply it. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order. O R D E R 1. Notice of Motion No.561 of 2018 stands disposed off/dismissed with liberty to defendant to file fresh Notice of Motion for making prayers made in this Notice of Motion. However, it is made clear that such fresh Notice of Motion should be filed by defendant himself and affidavit to be filed in support of said Notice of Motion should be affirmed by defendant himself only. 08/08/2019 (K.P.NANDEDKAR) JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT, MUMBAI. Dictated on : 08/08/2019 Transcribed on : 08/08/2019 Signed by HHJ on : 27/08/2019 -- 3 of 4 -- :4: NM.561/18 IN SUIT3346/2009 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGEMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 27/08/2019 4.30PM Gopal N. Sutar Name of the Judge HHJ Shri K.P.NANDEDKAR(CR No.9) Date of Pronouncement of Judgement/Order. 08/08/2019 Judgement/order signed by P.O on 08/08/2019 Judgement/order uploaded on 27/08/2019 -- 4 of 4 --
