Full Order Text
Order 1 · 07 Sept 2019 · CNR MHCC010021242018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: SUMMARY SUIT NO.964/2018 1 Received on : 09022018 Registered on : 07092018 Decided on : 07092019 Duration : 01Y 06M 27D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 964 of 2018 (CNR NO.: MHCC010021242018) Rajabai Gangaram Gadge Age 50yrs., of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant having her address at Room No.10/11, Stany Welfare Housing Society, Opp. Building No.16, Wadia Estate, Bail Bazar, Kurla(West), Mumbai400 070. Through Constituted Attorney Mr.Gangaram M Gadge Age 59 Yrs. ...Plaintiff Versus Ramila Vithal Solanki age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant working at B.M.C.,Conservancy Dept., “L” Ward, S.G.Barve Road, Kurla West, Mumbai400 070. Employee No.3635942 Paysheet No.6025 and residing at A/4 Municipal Chawl, Near Liance Garden, L.B.S.Road, Kurla West, Mumbai400 070. ….Defendant Appearances: Advocate Mr.Ramesh Jain and Mrs.Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. -- 1 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.964/2018 2 CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI.M.S.LONE (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 7th SEPTEMBER 2019 J U D G M E N T This is a suit for recovery of Rs.6,32,165/(Rupees Six Lacs Thirty Two Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Five only). 2. Plaintiff case in nut shell is that on 10/01/2016 defendant executed a demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff for valuable consideration of Rs.5,00,000/, the defendant also promised to pay interest @ 18% per annum on the said amount. On 12/04/2017 plaintiff demanded the said amount but defendant refused to pay. Defendant is in default of Rs.6,32,165/(Rupees Six Lacs Thirty Two Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Five only). Hence, this suit. 3. The defendant was served with summons for appearance but he remained absent therefore, suit is proceeded exparte against him. 4. From the material on record following points come for my determination and my findings with reasons are as follows: POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff proves that defendant executed promissory note for valuable consideration? Yes 2. Whether plaintiff proves that amount of Rs.6,32,165/(Rupees Six Lacs Thirty Two Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Five only) is due and recoverable from defendant? Yes -- 2 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.964/2018 3 3. Whether plaintiff is entitled for recovery of Rs.6,32,165/(Rupees Six Lacs Thirty Two Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Five only) with interest as claimed? Yes 4. What order and decree? As per final order REASONS AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 4. 5. Since all points are interlinked they are discussed together. To prove its case plaintiff examined Gangaram M Gadge, CA of plaintiff vide Exh.7 and filed original promissory note and notice of demand. 6. Heard Ld.Counsel for plaintiff. 7. The affidavit is supported by documents. The original promissory note and advocates demand notice shows that on 10/01/2016 defendant executed a demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff for valuable consideration of Rs.5,00,000/, the defendant also promised to pay interest @ 18% p.a. on the said amount. On 12/04/2017 plaintiff demanded the said amount but defendant refused to pay. Defendant is in default of Rs.6,32,165/(Rupees Six Lacs Thirty Two Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Five only). As far as rate of interest is concerned plaintiff has prayed for rate of 18% p.a. As per section 80 of the -- 3 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.964/2018 4 N.I.Act 1882 such rate of interest can be granted. Therefore, point No.1 to 3 is answer as 'Yes' and following order is passed. ORDER 1. Suit is exparte decreed with costs. 2. Defendant do pay to the plaintiff the amount of Rs.6,32,165/ (Rupees Six Lacs Thirty Two Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Five only) with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till full and final realization. 3. Court fee be refunded as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (M.S.LONE) Judge, Date: 07/09/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 07/09/2019 Transcribed on : 09/09/2019 Signed on : 09/09/2019 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 16/09/2019 at 11.50p.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Shri.M.S.Lone (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 07/09/2019 -- 4 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.964/2018 5 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 09/09/2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 16/09/2019 -- 5 of 5 --
