Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Satyawan Janardan KokaneVsVaishali Santosh Kale and Ors.

CNR MHCC0100211720208-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--WITHDRAWL
Decision Date: 23rd March 2022

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100769/2020
Registration Date
18 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 24-03-2020
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2020
    
    Date: 03-04-2020
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2020
    
    Date: 17-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 06-05-2020
    
    Date: 06-05-2020
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 28-05-2020
    
    Date: 28-05-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2020
    
    Date: 15-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 18-08-2020
    
    Date: 18-08-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2020
    
    Date: 05-10-2020
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2020
    
    Date: 23-10-2020
    Business: Constitution Attorney of plaintiff is present. He has tendered draft Notice of motion along with affidavit in support.  Leave to register Draft Notice of Motion is granted.
    The defendants are ordered to be served.
    The Chamber summons No.550/2020 is pending for reply and hearing.
    The plaintiff has filed on record the service affidavit showing that the defendants are duly served.  No reply is filed by the defendants. By this Chamber Summons the plaintiff wants to implead the subsequent purchaser and he has also filed the Draft Notice of Motion against them alleging that the suit premises has been already transferred in breach of injunction order, the purchaser is also likely to create third party interest in the suit premises.
    As such, I hold that the Chamber Summons deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed.
    The plaintiff to carry out necessary amendment in array of the party and serve the suit summons on added party along with the notice of the Draft Notice of Motion filed today.
    Matter is adjd. to 02.11.2020 for reply/hearing Notice of Motion.
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2020
    
    Date: 02-11-2020
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2020
    
    Date: 07-11-2020
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2020
    
    Date: 03-12-2020
    Business: Called at 02.05 PM.
    KB
    again called at 02.45 PM.
    None present.
    Matter is adjd. to 08.01.2021 for arguments.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2021
    
    Date: 08-01-2021
    Business: CA of plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mr. Kandekar for the defendant no.9.
    The plaintiff has taken out NM No. 1842/2020 and NM No. 1556/2020 against defendants no.5, 23 and 24. CA of the plaintiff submitted that defendants no.5, 23 and 24 have refused the accept the service. Hence, NM to proceed without their reply.
    Matter is adjd. to 18/02/2021 for  hearing of NM No.2306/17, NM No. 1842/2020 and NM No. 1556/2020.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 18-02-2021
    
    Date: 18-02-2021
    Business: CA of  plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Mr. Kandekar for the defendant No.9.
    Adv. Mr. Khatib for defendants No.16 to 22.
    KB   L.O.
    Heard CA of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed the suit of possession and declaration and recovery of future mesne profits. From the statement made by the CA of the plaintiff, it is clear that the plaintiff has valued the suit based on the sale deed of the year 2008. However, the suit is filed in the year 2015. It is well settled that the valuation of the suit  is to be made as on the date of the filing of the suit.   As per the provisions of Order VII Rule 1 of CPC,  the plaint shall contain a statement of the value of the subject-matter of the suit for the purposes of jurisdiction and of Court-fees, so far as the case admits, showing the provisions of law under which the valuation for Court-fees and jurisdiction is separately made. In the plaint, the plaintiff has not mentioned  the provisions of law under which the valuation for Court-fees and jurisdiction is made.  The CA of the plaintiff states that the plaintiff would pay the necessary Court Fees as per the provisions of the law. As such, the plaintiff shall pay Court fees on the market value of the suit property as per the provisions of  Section 6 (iv) (v) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act.   So, the plaintiff is  directed to pay court fees as per the provisions of section 6 (iv) (v) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act and correct the valuation clause of the plaint in consonance with the provisions of  Order VII Rule 1 of CPC.
    Matter is adjd. to 06/03/2021 for NM hearing and compliance.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2021
    
    Date: 06-03-2021
    Business: CA of plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Mr. Kandekar for the defendant No.9.
    The plaint was lodged on 25/09/2014. However, in the  rozanama dated 18/02/2021, based on the registration number of the suit, it was inadvertently mentioned that the suit was filed in the year 2015. The said typographical mistakes stands corrected.
    On oral request of the CA of the plaintiff, matter is adjd. to 03/04/2021 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2021
    
    Date: 06-03-2021
    Business: CA of plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Mr. Kandekar for the defendant No.9.
    The plaint was lodged on 25/09/2014. However, in the  rozanama dated 18/02/2021, based on the registration number of the suit, it was inadvertently mentioned that the suit was filed in the year 2015. The said typographical mistakes stands corrected.
    On oral request of the CA of the plaintiff, matter is adjd. to 03/04/2021 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2021
    
    Date: 06-03-2021
    Business: CA of plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Mr. Kandekar for the defendant No.9.
    The plaint was lodged on 25/09/2014. However, in the  rozanama dated 18/02/2021, based on the registration number of the suit, it was inadvertently mentioned that the suit was filed in the year 2015. The said typographical mistakes stands corrected.
    On oral request of the CA of the plaintiff, matter is adjd. to 03/04/2021 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2021
    
    Date: 06-03-2021
    Business: CA of plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Mr. Kandekar for the defendant No.9.
    The plaint was lodged on 25/09/2014. However, in the  rozanama dated 18/02/2021, based on the registration number of the suit, it was inadvertently mentioned that the suit was filed in the year 2015. The said typographical mistakes stands corrected.
    On oral request of the CA of the plaintiff, matter is adjd. to 03/04/2021 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2021
    
    Date: 03-04-2021
    Business: Due to SOP only urgent matter  are taken up. Hence, the Board is
    discharged.
    Matter is adjd. to 19.06.2021 for compliance
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 19-06-2021
    
    Date: 19-06-2021
    Business: Due to COVID-19 pandemic.
    Matter is adjourned.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 30-07-2021
    
    Date: 30-07-2021
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-08-2021
    
    Date: 18-08-2021
    Business: C.A of plaintiff present.
    Adv. Satamkar h/f Kandekar for defendant No.9 present.
    By consent, matter is adjd. to 21/08/2021 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2021
    
    Date: 21-08-2021
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 27-08-2021
    
    Date: 27-08-2021
    Business: court is on leave
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2021
    
    Date: 21-09-2021
    Business: C.A. of plaintiff present.
    None for defendants.
    Matter is adjd. to 07/10/2021 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2021
    
    Date: 07-10-2021
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 10-11-2021
    
    Date: 10-11-2021
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 12-11-2021
    
    Date: 12-11-2021
    Business: Court is on leave
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2021
    
    Date: 22-11-2021
    Business: Court is on Leave.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2021
    
    Date: 25-11-2021
    Business: As Court is busy is in hearing argument in SU 1954/21 NM 2416/21 and precipe matters. Hence, Board is discharged.
    Matter is adjd. to 04.12.2021 for hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2021
    
    Date: 04-12-2021
    Business: None present for the plaintiff.
    Adv Pathak H/f Adv Kandekar present for the MHADA.
    Matter is adjd. to 15.01.2022 for hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2022
    
    Date: 15-01-2022
    Business: Mr.Kokane Plaintiff in person present.
    None for defendants.
    LO at 03.07 pm.
    CA of Plaintiff appears in person.
    He filed additional list of documents TOR.
    None present for defendants.
    The CA submits that matter is proceeding without Written statement of defendants. In view of the on going SOP, it would not be proper to hear the CA in absence of defendants today. Therefore, matter is lastly adjd. to 03.02.2022 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 03-02-2022
    
    Date: 03-02-2022
    Business: Prashant Kokane C.A of  Plaintiff.
    Adv.Kandekar for defendant no.9 is present.
    Matter is adjd. to 28.02.2022 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2022
    
    Date: 28-02-2022
    Business: (As per order of Hon\''ble Principal Judge dtd.25/2/22, matter is reassigned to this court).
    Adv Pathak h/f Adv. Kandekar for MHADA present.
    Prashant Kokane, C.A. of plff present.
    Adjd for NM hearing to 6/4/22.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 07-03-2022
    
    Date: 07-03-2022
    Business: 04-03-2022.
    (As per order of Hon\''ble Principal Judge dtd.25/2/22, matter is reassigned to this court.)
    By Praecipe.
    CA of plaintiff in person is present.
    Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Kandekar for defendant No. 9 is present.
    None present for other defendants.
    CA of plaintiff submitted that MHADA is formal party and he will filed affidavit of service of notice for taking matter on today board.
    KB LO at 4.02 pm.
    CA of plaintiff tendered affidavit of service. TOR. He also tendered additional list of documents. TOR. It is marked at Exh.13.
    In view of request of CA of plaintiff  and affidavit of service.
    Matter is prepone and adjourned for NM hearing to 23.03.2022.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2022
    
    Date: 23-03-2022
    Business: C. A. of plaintiff Mr. Prashant Konkane present  for plaintiff and made endorsement on affidavit in support of nm no. 769/2017 that plaintiff is withdrawing notice of motion. He submitted to dispose off the nm no. 769/2020 as withdrawn. Hence, nm no. 769/2020 is disposed off as withdrawn.
    None present for defendant.
    Matter is already adjourned for hearing on nm no. 1842/2020 to 06/04/22.
    Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWL
    Disposal Date: 23-03-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102300/2020
    Filing Date: 18-02-2020
    First Hearing Date: 24th March 2020
    Decision Date: 23rd March 2022
    Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    23 Mar 2022
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
    Pdf Text: Daily Status
    IN THE COURT OF :COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100769/2020
    Satyawan Janardan Kokane Vs Vaishali Santosh Kale and Ors.
    Date : 23-03-2022
    Business : C. A. of plaintiff Mr. Prashant Konkane present for plaintiff
    and made endorsement on affidavit in support of nm no.
    769/2017 that plaintiff is withdrawing notice of motion. He
    submitted to dispose off the nm no. 769/2020 as withdrawn.
    Hence, nm no. 769/2020 is disposed off as withdrawn.
    None present for defendant. Matter is already adjourned for
    hearing on nm no. 1842/2020 to 06/04/22.
    Nature of Disposal : WITHDRAWL
    Disposal Date : 23-03-2022
    COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.