Date: 21-02-2020
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2020
Date: 25-02-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. J. V. Parmar @ Plaintiff present
Defendant no.1 with advocate Ms. Keni Thakkar for Defendant no.1 and 2 present and filed vakalatnama for Defendant no.1 and 2, t.o.r. Advocate for Defendant no.1 and 2 submitted that service of writ of summons is waived and on next date Defendants will file NM reply as well as Written Statement.
Case is adjourned to 16/03/2020 for NM reply/Written Statement. Defendant is directed to serve copy of NM reply and Written Statement in advance to advocate for Plaintiff.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2020
Date: 16-03-2020
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2020
Date: 27-04-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2020
Date: 05-06-2020
Business: Case is adjd.to 23.06.20 in view of extension of Lockdown period as per office order no.83/20 dtd.01.06.20
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2020
Date: 23-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2020
Date: 20-08-2020
Business: Due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2020
Date: 04-11-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2021
Date: 04-02-2021
Business: None present for plff.
Adv Ms.Dhruvika Bhayani i/b Adv Thakker for defts present and seeks time to file reply to NM.
As nobody is present for the plff, time to file reply is granted till next date.
Adjd. for NM reply to 29.04.2021.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2021
Date: 29-04-2021
Business: Due to Covid matter is adjd.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2021
Date: 29-07-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2021
Date: 11-08-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Mehul Rathod for plff present.
Adv Mr. J.V. Parmar for defts present and filed reply in NM No.779/2020. He also filed written statement on behalf of both defendants. On enquiry, he fairly conceded that WS is not in time as is prescribed in O-8 R-1 C.P.C. He seeks liberty to take out appropriate NM for delay condontiaon. With liberty to take out NM for delay condonation, the WS is kept on record with direction that it will be considered only if the delay condonation NM taken out if any by the defts is allowed.
Adv. for the plff seeks adjournment by submitting that order in DV Act matter is passed which is a recent development.
By consent,matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 09.09.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2021
Date: 09-09-2021
Business: Adv. Parmar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Deepali Majethia i/b Adv. Kenny Thakkar for defendant present and tendered registered NM No.1958/21 a/w affidavit in support.
Adv. for plaintiff endorsed reply on the NM itself.
Heard.
Ld. advocate for the plaintiff though endorsed reply of objection on the NM, he orally submitted to the order of the Court.
Considering it and the reasons mentioned in affidavit filed in support of the NM, this Court is of the opinion that for giving fair opportunity to the defendants to contest the suit on merit, it would be just to allow the NM by imposing certain cost on the defendants. In the result, NM No.1958/21 is allowed subject to cost of Rs.2000/- (Two Thousand Rupees).
Defendants shall pay the cost to the plaintiff on or before next date.
Adv. for the plaintiff endorsed on NM No.779/20 as not pressed with liberty to file fresh NM.
O - In view of the endorsement made by the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff, NM No.779/2020 is disposed of at this stage with liberty to the plaintiff to take out fresh notice of motion if required.
Matter is adjd. for compliance to 01/10/2021.
Judge
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2021
Date: 01-10-2021
Business: Son of plff present.
Adv Ms. Bhayani for deft present and submitted that cost as per order passed in N.M.No.1958/2021 on previous date is already paid.
Since cost is paid as per order passed on previous date, WS of deft Nos.1 and 2 is taken on record and it is R & R at Exh.3.
N.M.No.779/2020 is appearing on the board though it is already disposed off on 09.09.2021 hence, it be marked as already disposed off in CIS.
Matter is adjd. for draft issues to 04.10.2021.
NM disposed off on Roznama dt.09.09.2021-
Adv. Parmar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Deepali Majethia i/b Adv. Kenny Thakkar for defendant present and tendered registered NM No.1958/21 a/w affidavit in support.
Adv. for plaintiff endorsed reply on the NM itself.
Heard.
Ld. advocate for the plaintiff though endorsed reply of objection on the NM, he orally submitted to the order of the Court.
Considering it and the reasons mentioned in affidavit filed in support of the NM, this Court is of the opinion that for giving fair opportunity to the defendants to contest the suit on merit, it would be just to allow the NM by imposing certain cost on the defendants. In the result, NM No.1958/21 is allowed subject to cost of Rs.2000/- (Two Thousand Rupees).
Defendants shall pay the cost to the plaintiff on or before next date.
Adv. for the plaintiff endorsed on NM No.779/20 as not pressed with liberty to file fresh NM.
O - In view of the endorsement made by the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff, NM No.779/2020 is disposed of at this stage with liberty to the plaintiff to take out fresh notice of motion if required.
Matter is adjd. for compliance to 01/10/2021.
Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWL
Disposal Date: 01-10-2021