Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 05 Jan 2022 · CNR MHCC010020962020
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Filed on :17.02.2020 Registered On :07.03.2020 Decided on :5.01.2022 Duration : Y-01/M-10/D-18 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 261 OF 2020 Exhibit- 07 CNR NO.- MHCC01-002096-2020 Mahendra Premchandji Jain Of Mumbai , an adult Indian Inhabitant, Residing at 46, Modi Street, Ground Floor, Fort, Mumbai- 400 001. ... Plaintiff V/s. Ajit Damodar Naik Age Not known of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant, Working for gain with Western Railway Store Department, EMP no. 12165232, 4th Floor, Station Building, Head Quarters, Churchgate, Mumbai- 400 020. And Residing at , Gg-1, Dahyabhai Mesmi Chawl Majas Janta Colony, Ambica Nagar, Jogeshwari(East), Mumbai- 400 060. ... Defendants Appearance:- Mr. Ramesh Jain Advocate for the plaintiff. Exparte against Defendants. -- 1 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.261/2020 2 CORAM : HER HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY (C.R. NO.61). DATE : 5/01/2022 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.) 1. This is a summary suit instituted by the plaintiff under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 against the defendant. 2. The suit claim of the plaintiff is narrated in nutshell as under: The defendant was under liability to pay towards the plaintiff hence, towards the discharge of said legal liability he drew and delivered to the plaintiff a cheque dtd. 24.10.2018 bearing no.553189 drawn on The Greater Bombay Co-operative Bank Ltd., Vile Parle (East), Mumbai- 400 057, for valuable consideration of Rs.75,000/-. Said cheque on being presented to the bank has been dishonored vide a memo of dishonor dtd.15.11.2018 with a remark of “Funds Insufficient”. By virtue of dishonor of said cheque and pursuant to the provisions of Negotiable Instrument Act, the plaintiff has become entitled to recover said amount of cheque alongwith interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of dishonor of cheque. 3. The plaintiff issued letter/notice through advocate on 19.11.2018 to the defendant calling upon him to pay the amount of Rs. 75,000/- alongwith accrued interest but the defendant failed to comply with said requisition. The plaintiff averred that the defendant is liable -- 2 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.261/2020 3 to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.90,941.09ps/-with interest. 4. Thus, the plaintiff has filed the present suit against the defendant for recovery. It is averred that the defendant is liable to pay a sum of Rs.90,941.09ps/- to the plaintiff and further interest at the rate of 18% p.a on the principal amount from the date of suit till its realization. Hence, this suit. 5. The suit summons were duly served on the defendant but he failed to appear and contest the suit. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 judgment. 6. The following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under:- Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS. 1. Whether the plaintiff entitled for recovery of amount against the defendants ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.90,941.09ps/- with interest @ 18% per annum on the principal amount 2. What order and decree? As per final order. REASONS 7. In order to establish the suit claim, the plaintiff has filed following documentary evidence below Exh.06 i.e the list of documents: -- 3 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.261/2020 4 Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits 1 Cheque dtd. 24.10.2018 being Exhibit “A” to the plaint. Exh. 6/1 2 Memo of Dishonour Dtd. 15.11.2018 being Exhibit “B” to the Plaint Exh. 6/2 3 Plaintiff’s Advocates’ letter dated 19.11.2018, being Exhibit “C” to the plaint, alongwith the postal records in connection therewith. Exh. 6/3 AS TO POINT NO.1: 8. This is a summary suit which is not contested by the defendant. The documents produced on record by the plaintiff shows that the defendant issued the cheque to the plaintiff for the amount of Rs.75,000/- and said cheque came to be dishonored for insufficiency of funds. Said amount is not paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. Further, it reveals from the record that said transaction for issuance of cheque took place on dtd.24.10.2018, the notice/letter of demand was issued to the defendant on dtd.19.11.2018 and the suit is filed on 17.2.2018. As such, the plaintiff’s claim in the suit is well within limitation. 9. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit- 06 goes to establish that the defendant has issued cheque for Rs.75,000/- towards the legal liability but staid cheque got dishonored. The legal liability is not discharged by the defendant. Therefore, the plaintiff is claiming Rs.90,941.09ps/- which is the amount calculated with interest at the rate of 18% p.m from the date of dishonor of cheque -- 4 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.261/2020 5 till the filing of suit. Said amount is not repaid by the defendant. Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.90,941.09ps/- to the plaintiff. In this background, I have arrived at the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover sum of Rs.90,941.09ps/--from the defendant. 10. According to the plaintiff the outstanding dues against the defendant is Rs.90,941.09ps/- and said amount is calculated alongwith with interest at the rate of 18% p.m from the of dishonor of cheque till the filing of suit. Apart from said amount which is due against the defendant on the date of filing of the suit, the plaintiff has claimed interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal amount. The defendant neither appeared nor contested the suit. There is nothing on record to show that the said translations between the parties was not the commercial transactions. Therefore, I hold the plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal amount alongwith interest at the rate of 18% p.a. till realization of the amount. Therefore, I hold, the rate of interest at the rate of 18% per annum would be just and proper to be awarded on the principal sum of Rs.75,000/-. Hence, point no.1 is answered in the affirmative. AS TO POINT NO.2: 11. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1, it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.90,941.09ps/- from the defendant with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.75,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from the defendant. Hence, in answered to point no.2, I proceed to pass the following order. -- 5 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.261/2020 6 ORDER 1. The defendant shall pay Rs.90,941.09ps/-(Rs. Ninety Thousand Nine Hundred Forty One and Nine paise Only) to the plaintiff, with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.75,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. The defendant do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules. 4. Decree be drawn accordingly. (A.H. Kashikar) AD-HOC Judge, City Civil Court, Date :5.1.2022 Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 5.1.2022 Typed on : 10.1.2022 Signed on : 10.1.2022 -- 6 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.261/2020 7 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 10.1.2022 1.00p .m. ( K.M. Rana ) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar (C.R.No.61) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 5.1.2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 10.1.2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 10.1.2022 -- 7 of 7 --
