Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 23/03/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA T.A. 35/18 Applicant in person present. Heard the applicant in person and perused the application. The transfer of the suit is sought on the ground of bias in the mind of Presiding Officer and the applicant apprehends he will not get fair trial. The present application on this ground is not maintainable before this Court. The Hon'ble High Court while considering provision of Section…
TRANSFER APPL
Mr. Narendra Kumar Bhagwandas Gupta +1 moreVsMrs. Satibha Ajit Upadhayay +1 more
CNR MHCC01002090201819-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 23rd March 2018
TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100035/2018
- Registration Date
- 09 Feb 2018
Advocates
0No advocate information is available in this record.
Parties
4Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 12-02-2018 Business: None present for the parties. Adjd. to 20/02/2018 for appearance. Next Purpose: FOR APPERANCE Next Hearing Date: 20-02-2018 Date: 20-02-2018 Business: Applicant No.1 in person present. Applicant to file affidavit of service. Adjd. to 26/02/2018 for service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2018 Date: 26-02-2018 Business: Applicant in person present. He files affidavit of service. None present for respondents. Adjd. to 05/03/2018 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2018 Date: 05-03-2018 Business: Applicant present. None present for Resp. Application to proceed without reply. Matter adjd to 19/3/2018 for hearing. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2018 Date: 19-03-2018 Business: Applicant Nos.1 and 2 present. None present for respondent. Adjd. to 22/03/2018 for hearing of respondent. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 22-03-2018 Date: 22-03-2018 Business: Applicant No.1 in person present. None present for respondent. Adjd. to 23/03/2018 for order. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2018 Date: 23-03-2018 Business: Applicant in person present. Heard the applicant in person and perused the application. The transfer of the suit is sought on the ground of bias in the mind of Presiding Officer and the applicant apprehends he will not get fair trial. The present application on this ground is not maintainable before this Court. The Hon\''ble High Court while considering provision of Section 10 of the Presidency Small Causes Court Act, in the case of Dadaji Dhackjee and Co. Ltd. V/s. Neelam V. Rajani and or, 2016(1) ALL MR 426 and in the case of Smt. Manaharbala Jeram Damodar and Anr. V/s. Prabhudas Damodar Kotecha and others, 2001(2) MHLJ 477 has held that the said power cannot be exercised for transferring the matters on the grounds mentioned in the present application. Provision of Section 7 of the City Civil Court Act is pari mataria with Section 10 of the Presidency Small Causes Court Act. Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED Disposal Date: 23-03-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 102230/2018 Filing Date: 09-02-2018 First Hearing Date: 12th February 2018 Decision Date: 23rd March 2018 Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
Orders
2Final Order 1Full order available
23 Mar 2018
Order 1Full order available
23 Mar 2018
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 23/03/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA T.A. 35/18 Applicant in person present. Heard the applicant in person and perused the application. The transfer of the suit is sought on the ground of bias in the mind of Presiding Officer and the applicant apprehends he will not get fair trial. The present application on this ground is not maintainable before this Court. The Hon'ble High Court while considering provision of Section…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
