Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr Chandroo L. Mirpuri - High Court Notice Of Motion No. 795 of 2010VsThe Sindhu Resettlement Corporation Ltd And Ors

CNR MHCC0100207820193-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 07th February 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100806/2019
Registration Date
25 Feb 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr Chandroo L. Mirpuri - High Court Notice Of Motion No. 795 of 2010

    Respondent

    1. 1The Sindhu Resettlement Corporation Ltd And Ors

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 07-02-2019
Business: Adv. Vishwajeet for plaintiff present and requested to keep back the matter for NM hearing. None for defendant. Kept back later on 3.40 pm. Both parties and their advocates are absent. kept back. Later on at 4.15 pm. Same appearance. Nobody appeared despite calling out the matter second time at 3.40 pm. The advocate who appeared in the morning appeared again at 4.15 pm. but did not argue the notice of motion. Hence notice of motion no. 795/2010 (filed before Honble High Court) is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 07-02-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101806/2019
Filing Date: 25-02-2019
First Hearing Date: 07th February 2019
Decision Date: 07th February 2019
Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    07 Feb 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100806/2019
Mr Chandroo L. Mirpuri - High Court Notice Of Motion No. 795 of 2010 Vs The Sindhu
Resettlement Corporation Ltd And Ors
Date : 07-02-2019
Business : Adv. Vishwajeet for plaintiff present and requested to keep
back the matter for NM hearing. None for defendant. Kept
back later on 3.40 pm. Both parties and their advocates are
absent. kept back. Later on at 4.15 pm. Same appearance.
Nobody appeared despite calling out the matter second time
at 3.40 pm. The advocate who appeared in the morning
appeared again at 4.15 pm. but did not argue the notice of
motion. Hence notice of motion no. 795/2010 (filed before
Honble High Court) is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED
Disposal Date : 07-02-2019
COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.