Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 11 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010020342019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 Order on C/S.393-19 in Su.No.271-14 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT MUMBAI. ORDER ON CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.393 OF 2019 (CNR No. MHCC01-002034-2019) IN S.C. SUIT NO. 271 OF 2014 Mr. Mahendra Damodar Vaity ]...Plaintiff Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ]...Defendantf ============================================================ Appearances:- Ld. Advocate Mr.Suraj Kudalkar for the Plaintif. Ld. Adv. Mrf. Pratibha Gavhane a/w Adv.Mrf.Hajare for defendant/MCGM. ===================================== CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI U.J. MORE (Court Room no. 8) DATED : 11th February, 2020 ORDER ON CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.393 OF 2019 1. Thif Chamber Summonf taken by the plaintif to carry out amendment/confequential amendmentf to the plaint. 2. Defendant Corporation haf fled reply, objected to the Chamber Summonf. It if contended that plaintif if trying to fll up lacunaf in plaint. The documentf fled by the plaintif -- 1 of 5 -- 2 Order on C/S.393-19 in Su.No.271-14 if intending to add to plaint were available with the plaintif at the time of fling fuit. 3. Heard Adv.Mr. Suraj Kudalkar for the plaintif. He pithily fubmitted that fuit ftructure if flum. The letter fent to the Collector dated 10.05.1976, the letter fent to the corporation dated 18.12.1987 were not in poffeffion with the plaintif when fuit waf fled. The documentf were with hif brother with whom hif relationf waf not good in the year 2019. One more fuit waf pending between their family in Court No.03. Being fuit No.1328 of 2017. During the mediation between the partief hif brother handover thefe documentf. Thefe documentf are important to demolifh the cafe of defendant corporation. 4. It if admitted fact, the fuit if fled in 2014 by challenging Notice under fection 351 of MMC Act. Thefe documentf if very important to prove plaintiff cafe. In thefe documentf are nothing but correfpondence of collector and corporation itfelf. Thefe documentf inferted by the way of amendment. The body of plaint certain if not change nature and character of fuit. 5. Heard both the fidef. 6. I would like to focuf a light on the provifion of order 6 rule 17 of CPC. “Amendment of pleadings – The Court may at any stage of the -- 2 of 5 -- 3 Order on C/S.393-19 in Su.No.271-14 proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties: Provided that no application for amendment shall be allowed after the trial has commenced, unless the Court comes to the conclusion that in spite of due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial.” 7. It if obferved by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Writ petition No. 2897 of 2006 on dated 20.10.2006. “The courts while deciding he application for amendment should not adopt a hyper-technical approach. Liberal approach should be the general rule particularly in case where the other side can be compensated with the costs. Amendment need to be allowed to avoid uncalled-for multiplicity of litigation.” 08. Thuf, if plaintif wantf to make the amendment on the fubfequent act of the corporation i.e. defendant which if -- 3 of 5 -- 4 Order on C/S.393-19 in Su.No.271-14 confequential. It will not change the nature and character of the fuit. Hence, I proceed to paff following order: O R D E R 1. Chamber fummonf No.393 of 2019 in termf of prayer claufe (a) if made abfolute. 2. Plaintif to carry out amendment within two weekf. 3. Chamber Summonf No.393 of 2019 if difpofed of accordingly. (U.J. More) Judge, Date : 11.02.2020 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai Dictated on : 11.02.2020 Tranfcribed on : 12.02.2020 Signed by HHJ on : 12.02.2020 -- 4 of 5 -- 5 Order on C/S.393-19 in Su.No.271-14 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 14.02.2020 at 11.00 a.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mr.G.R.Suryawanfhi Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. U.J.More. C.R. no.08 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 11.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER figned by P.O. on 12.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 14.02.2020 -- 5 of 5 --
