SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Mr. Naveen Shankar ShettyVsMCGM +1 more
CNR MHCC01002034201811-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100387/2018
- Registration Date
- 08 Feb 2018
- Next Hearing Date
- 29 Sept 2026
- Case Stage
- RECORDING EVIDENCE
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
3Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 09-02-2018
Business: ess height of Hotel Mansa at LBS Marg, Bhandup (w), defendant officer has informed regarding the fact that the structure has been tolerated, in view of certain compliance by the Plaintiff. It is letter dtd 6.01.1994. Further according to the Plaintiff, he has made compliance. It is not the case of the defendant at this stage that there is non compliance of condition by the Plaintiff, in view of letter dtd 6.01.1994. Further it appears that the Plaintiff has paid charges to the defendant on account of toleration of mezzanine floor, WC block and excess height. In this background, notice prima facie nowhere discloses issued in respect of further construction, but it is issued in respect of unauthorized construction of ground plus one floor. Further order passed, discloses the same subject and conclusion seems to be drawn that no evidence in respect of existence of notice structure prior to 17.04.1964. But, considering documents Prima facie it reveals that structure is in existence prior t
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2018
Date: 26-02-2018
Business: As court is busy in mediation matters and dictating judgment in SU no. 3742/11. Hence board is discharged. Earlier order to continued till next date.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2018
Date: 17-03-2018
Business: Advocate Mr. Tiwari for the Plaintiff present.
Advocate Mr. Khandagale for BMC/deft. Present and filed Written statement (Exh. 3). T.O.R.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Matter adjd to 09.04.2018 for reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 09-04-2018
Date: 09-04-2018
Business: As the Court is busy in hearing ad-interim matters, hence board is discharged.
Earlier order to continue till the next date.
Matter is adjd. to 23/04/2018 for reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2018
Date: 23-04-2018
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/deft present and filed list of documents exh.4 .t.o.r.
As the court is busy in preceipe matters and urgent matters. Hence, matter adjd to 27.06.2018.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 27-06-2018
Date: 27-06-2018
Business: Adv Tiwari h/f adv Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Adjourned to 13.08.2018 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2018
Date: 13-08-2018
Business: Court is vacant. Hence today board is discharged.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2018
Date: 19-09-2018
Business: Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Hajare for BMC/Deft present and sought time to file reply to Notice of Motion.
Both Plaintiff and Defendant contended that matter may be kept on 15/10/2018, hence by consent, case is adjourned to 15/10/2018.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2018
Date: 15-10-2018
Date: 26-11-2018
Business: Advocate for Plaintiff present.
Advocate for BMC/Deft present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 21/01/2019 for reply/hearing of Notice of Motion.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2019
Date: 21-01-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 01-03-2019
Date: 01-03-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present and submitted that, copy of NM reply and documents submitted by BMC are not with him.
Advocate Ms. Tondawlar for BMC/Deft present and submitted that, she will provide xerox copy of reply and documents to advocate for Plaintiff.
Case is adjourned to 03/04/2019 for NM hearing.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2019
Date: 03-04-2019
Business: Court is busy in hearing Notice of Motion in suit no.1260/18, hence case is adjourned to 12/06/2019.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2019
Date: 12-06-2019
Business: Advocate Tiwari h/f adv. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present and sought time. Time is granted.
Advocate Ms. Chavan for defendant/MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 21.08.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2019
Date: 21-08-2019
Business: Advocate Bhosle h/f adv. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Advocate Giri h/f adv. Ms. Chavan for defendant/MCGM present and sought time. Time is granted.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 30.09.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2019
Date: 30-09-2019
Business: Advocate Bhosle h/f adv. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present and filed original Notice of Motion No.804/18 along with affidavit in support of Notice of Motion. T.O.R.
Advocate Ms. Chavan for defendant /MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 13.11.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2019
Date: 13-11-2019
Business: Adv. Mr. Mukesh Dube h/f adv. Mr. Nilesh Pande for plaintiff, submits that adv. Mr. Pande is in another court, prayed for adjd.
Adv. Ms. Chavhan for defendant/MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing on 13.01.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2020
Date: 13-01-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. Bhosale h/f adv. Nilesh Pandey for plff., prayed for adjd as adv. Mr. Pandey is busy before Mantralya. Similar was the ground on last date. adjournment is granted as last chance, in default to argue on next date, EOC will be vacated, without any specific order. Next date 10.02.2020. as prayed for adv. Mr. Bhosale.
Adv. Mrs. Chavhan for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing on 10.02.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-02-2020
Date: 10-02-2020
Business: Adv. Mr.Tiwari h/f adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for plff., prayed for adjd as busy in another court.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
Adjournment is granted as last chance.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing on 23.03.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2020
Date: 23-03-2020
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2020
Date: 01-04-2020
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2020
Date: 16-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-05-2020
Date: 05-05-2020
Business: National lokcdown
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-05-2020
Date: 27-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2020
Date: 12-06-2020
Business: Adjd. to
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020
Date: 17-08-2020
Business: Adjd. to
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2020
Date: 29-10-2020
Business: Due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 19-01-2021
Date: 19-01-2021
Business: Advocate Ms. Priyanka Dubey for plaintiff is present.
Adv. Ms. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 09.03.21.
Judge
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-03-2021
Date: 09-03-2021
Business: Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhosale h/f Mr. Dubey for plaintiff present and submitted that his senior is busy in Hon\''ble High Court and requested for short adjournment.
Adv. Ms. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
Matter is adjourned for NM hearing to 29.04.21.
Judge
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2021
Date: 29-04-2021
Business: Due to Covid-19 matter is adjourned to next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-07-2021
Date: 20-07-2021
Business: Due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2021
Date: 07-09-2021
Business: Court is Vacant. Matter is Adj.to next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2021
Date: 14-10-2021
Business: Court is vacant. Matter is adj. to next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2021
Date: 25-11-2021
Business: Court is vacant. Matter is adj. to next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2022
Date: 06-01-2022
Business: Adv Pathak H/f Adv Pandey for plaintiff present.
Adv. Miss. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
Adv. for plaintiff orally requested for time to file NM hearing. Granted as a last chance.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 17/02/2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2022
Date: 17-02-2022
Business: Advocate Mr. Pandey for the Plaintiff is present and requested for time for NM hearing. He further informed this Court to verify from the plaintiff as to whether the matter can be settled through National Lok-adalat. Considering his request, the matter is adjourned shortly, calling upon the plaintiff to proceed with the suit positively on the next date.
Adv. Ms. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for Settlement/ NM hearing on 08/03/2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-03-2022
Date: 08-03-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff is present and orally requested time for NM hearing. The matter is old one. Hence, this request is discarded.
Adv. Ms. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
LO at 4.15 pm.
Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff is present and he informed that the matter is likely to be settled. He is informed that, the matter was called and already adjourned.
Matter adjourned for NM dismissal to 07.04.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 07-04-2022
Date: 07-04-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Bhosale h/f Adv. Pandey for plaintiff is present and filed reply-rejoinder in NM No. 804/18. TOR. Copy is supplied to the other side.
Adv. Ms. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 21.07.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-07-2022
Date: 21-07-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mrs. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present and orally requested for time to file sur-reply rejoinder. Granted lastly.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for reply rejoinder/NM hearing to 13.09.2022.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 13-09-2022
Date: 13-09-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mrs. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present and orally requested for time to file NM reply. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for NM reply and WS to 11.10.2022.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2022
Date: 11-10-2022
Business: Adv. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Khandagale h/f Adv. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present and orally requested for time to file sur-reply rejoinder. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for sur-reply rejoinder to 01.12.2022.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2022
Date: 01-12-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Ms. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present and endorsed say on the reply rejoinder of the plaintiff.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 02.02.2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 02-02-2023
Date: 02-02-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Bhosale h/f Adv. Pandey for the plaintiff is present and requested for time to file written submissions on NM on the ground that mother of Adv. Pandey is hospitalized. Time is granted.
Adv. Mrs. J.V. Mhatre for defendants/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM to 09.03.2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-03-2023
Date: 09-03-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Bhosale h/f Adv. Pandey for the plaintiff is present and requested for time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted strictly as a last chance. In default, the interim Order would stand vacated.
Adv. Mrs. S.S. Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM to 27.04.2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2023
Date: 27-04-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Bhosale for the plaintiff is present and filed written submissions in NM No. 804/2018. Copy supplied to the other side.
Adv. Mrs. Smita Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present and requested for time to argue on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing by defendant to 04.07.2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2023
Date: 04-07-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Ms. S.S. Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present and orally requested for time to argue NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 29.08.2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2023
Date: 29-08-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhosale for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale h/f Adv. Ms. S.S. Chavan for defendant/ MCGM is present and requested time to argue the NM. Time is granted. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 10.10.2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2023
Date: 10-10-2023
Business: Matter pertains to C. R. No. 11
Adv. Mr. Bhosale for the plaintiff is present.
None present for Defendant/MCGM.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM reply/WS to 30.11.2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 30-11-2023
Date: 30-11-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Bhosale h/f Adv. Pandey for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and sought time to file written submission on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM to 09.01.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2024
Date: 09-01-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhosale for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM to 29.02.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 29-02-2024
Date: 29-02-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhosale for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM to 26.03.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2024
Date: 26-03-2024
Business: Adv. Ms. Amruta Kundap h/f Adv. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM by defendant to 02.05.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2024
Date: 02-05-2024
Business: Matter pertains to C. R. No. 11
Adv. Amruta Kundap h/f Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey present for the plaintiff.
None present for defendant/MCGM.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 23.07.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2024
Date: 23-07-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav a/w Adv. Ms. Nagarthawar for defendant/ MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM by defendant to 12.09.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 12-09-2024
Date: 12-09-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Mukesh Dubey h/f Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/ MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM to 22.10.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2024
Date: 22-10-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar a/w Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM by defendant to 14.11.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2024
Date: 14-11-2024
Business: None present for the plaintiff. Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar a/w Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM to 02.01.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 02-01-2025
Date: 02-01-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhosale for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar a/w Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/MCGM is present. She is heard on NM. The advocate for plaintiff sought time for rejoinder on argument.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 14.01.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2025
Date: 14-01-2025
Business: Matter pertains to C.R.11.
Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar a/w Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 25.02.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2025
Date: 25-02-2025
Business: Adv. Ms. Amruta Kundap h/f Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. Metakari a/w Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present. Today matter is listed for rejoinder argument by plaintiff but advocate Mr. Pandey is not available. Hence, Time is granted strictly as last chance. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 20.03.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2025
Date: 20-03-2025
Business: None present for the plaintiff. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari for defendant/BMC is present. Today matter is listed for NM hearing but none present for the plaintiff. Hence, NM posted for dismissal for want of prosecution. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM dismissal to 19.04.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2025
Date: 19-04-2025
Business: None present for the plaintiff. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/ BMC is present. Kept back.
Later on 5.26 p.m.
The appearance is as above. Today matter is listed for dismissal of NM but none present for the plaintiff. Roznama shows that matter was listed on 25.02.2025 for rejoinder argument by plaintiff but None present for the plaintiff. Hence, matter adjourned 20.03.2025 but on that none present for the plaintiff. Today when called repeatedly till 5.26 p.m. none present for the plaintiff. This shows that plaintiff not interested to proceed with the suit. Hence, NM No. 804/2018 stands dismissed.
Adjourned for draft issues to 15.07.2025.
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 15-07-2025
Date: 15-07-2025
Business: None present for the plaintiff. Adv. Mrs. Metakari a/w Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present.
Adjourned for draft issues to 09.09.2025.
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2025
Date: 09-09-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Rishab Dubey for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari for defendant/BMC is present.
Issues are framed at Exhibit 5.
Adjourned for filing documents on affidavit to 04.11.2025.
Next Purpose: FILING AFFIDAVIT OF DOCUMENT
Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2025
Date: 04-11-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Rishab Dubey for the plaintiff is present and sought time to adduce evidence. Time is granted. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari for defendant/BMC is present.
Adjourned for RE/filing documents to 13.01.2026.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2026
Date: 13-01-2026
Business: Adv. Mr. Hrishab Dubey h/f Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present and seeks time to adduce evidence. Time is granted. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari a/w Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present.
Adjourned for RE to 17.03.2026.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2026
Date: 17-03-2026
Business: None present for the plaintiff to lead evidence. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present. Witness absent.
Adjourned for RE (PH) to 18.04.2026.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2026
Date: 18-04-2026
Business: Adv. Sayali Shinde h/f Adv. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff present
and requesting time filing evidence and documents.
Plaintiff present
Adv. Mr. Yadav h/f Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
K.B.
Adjourned for filing evidence and documents to 20.06.2026.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2026
Date: 20-06-2026
Business: None present for the plaintiff. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/ BMC is present.
Adjourned for RE to 18.07.2026.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2026
Date: 18-07-2026
Business: Adv. Ms. Sayali Shinde h/f Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present and seeks time to adduce evidence. Time is granted. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present.
Adjourned for RE to 27.08.2026.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 27-08-2026
Date: 27-08-2026
Business: PO is on half day leave (1st Session).
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2026Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 102183/2018 Filing Date: 08-02-2018 First Hearing Date: 05th April 2018 Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Interim Order 109 Sept 2025
09 Sept 2025
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Exhibit –5 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI L. C. SUIT NO. 387 OF 2018 Mr. Naveen Shankar Shetty. …. PLAINTIFF. V/s. Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Assistant Commissioner. …. DEFENDANTS. ISSUES 1. Whether the plaintiff proves that as the suit premises is in existence prior to datum line it is a tolerated structure ? 2. Whether the plaintiff proves that as suit premises is situated on land which is notified slum it is protected structure? 3. Whether the plaintiff proves that impugned notice dtd. 16-11-2017 and speaking order dtd.01.02.2018 are illegal and bad-in-law ? 4. Whether the suit is bad for want of notice under section 527 of MMC Act? 5. Whether the jurisdiction of Court is barred in view of section 515A of MMC Act? 6. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of declaration as sought ? 7. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of perpetual injunction as sought ? 8. What order and decree ? (V.R. Jagdale) Mumbai. Judge, Dated : 09.09.2025. City Civil Court, Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
Order 109 Sept 2025
09 Sept 2025
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Exhibit –5 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI L. C. SUIT NO. 387 OF 2018 Mr. Naveen Shankar Shetty. …. PLAINTIFF. V/s. Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Assistant Commissioner. …. DEFENDANTS. ISSUES 1. Whether the plaintiff proves that as the suit premises is in existence prior to datum line it is a tolerated structure ? 2. Whether the plaintiff proves that as suit premises is situated on land which is notified slum it is protected structure? 3. Whether the plaintiff proves that impugned notice dtd. 16-11-2017 and speaking order dtd.01.02.2018 are illegal and bad-in-law ? 4. Whether the suit is bad for want of notice under section 527 of MMC Act? 5. Whether the jurisdiction of Court is barred in view of section 515A of MMC Act? 6. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of declaration as sought ? 7. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of perpetual injunction as sought ? 8. What order and decree ? (V.R. Jagdale) Mumbai. Judge, Dated : 09.09.2025. City Civil Court, Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.