Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Shafatulla Mehmoodulla SiddiquiVsMHADA

CNR MHCC0100199720208-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 15th October 2022

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100515/2020
Registration Date
15 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 07-03-2020
    Business: Adv. Sakhalkar for the Plaintiff present and he tendered registered N/M no. 987/2020 alongwith affidavit in support. t.o.r.
    Adv. Mangal Kadam for the Defendant present and she filed reply to N/M no. 987/20. t.o.r.
    Heard arguments of both sides. Matter is adjourned for order on N/M. The Ld adv for Defendant is not ready to continue the undertaking given by the Defendant no. 1 till date of the order. The officer Mr. Ritesh Kumar Sahu Deputy Engineer on behalf of the Defendant, however undertakes that the Defendant will not take any coercive action to demolish the premises or to dispossess the Plaintiff till next date.
    Matter is adjd. to  13.03.2020 for N/M orders.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 13-03-2020
    
    Date: 13-03-2020
    Business: Adv. Mr. Sakhalkar for the Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Ms. Mangal Kadam for Defendant/MHADA present.
    Parties were heard on the N/M on the last date and it was fixed today for order. The adv for Plaintiff shows copy of approved plan to show that the provision of Development Control and Promotion Regulations for Greater Mumbai, R-33(7) are applicable. The Ld adv for the Defendant/MHADA sites one judgment of the Hon\''ble Bombay High Court. The substantive claim of the Plaintiff is based on the memorandum dtd 17.12.2008. The adv for the Defendant has challenged its genuineness. Under such circumstances, the original memorandum and general Power of Attorney have to be perused and also the plan and the ruling have to be considered.
    Earlier statement by the Defendant to continue till next date.
    Matter is adjd. to 17.03.2020 for production of the original memorandum and Power of Attorney, plan by the Plaintiff/ N/M order.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2020
    
    Date: 17-03-2020
    Business: Adv. Mr. Sakhalkar for the Plaintiff present and he filed original documents for inspection of the Court.
    Earlier ad interim order be continued till next date.
    Matter is adjd. to 18.03.2020 for N/M orders.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 18-03-2020
    
    Date: 18-03-2020
    Business: Adv. Mangal Kadam for defendant no. 1 is present.
    Due to direction to combat Corona Virus, board is discharged as
    only matters for argument are taken up.
    For the reason separately recorded, the following order is passed-
                                         ORDER
    1. The Notice of Motion No.987 of 2020 is hereby dismissed.
    2. Ad-interim relief granted, if any, shall stands vacated.
    3.The Notice of Motion No.987 of 2020 stands disposed of
     accordingly.
    Matter is adjd. for written statement to 10.07.2020.
    Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2020
    
    Date: 10-07-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2020
    
    Date: 07-12-2020
    Business: None present for the plaintiff.
    None present for the defendant.
    Defendant fail to file written statement within stipulated period.
    Hence no WS order is passed against the defendant.
    Matter is adjd. to 15.03.2021 for evidence of the plaintiff (without WS)
    Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2021
    
    Date: 15-03-2021
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mangal Kadam for defendant No.1.
    Matter is adjd. to  05/05/2021 for No WS hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 05-05-2021
    
    Date: 05-05-2021
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: HEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 14-07-2021
    
    Date: 14-07-2021
    Business: Due to COVID-19 pandemic.
    Next Purpose: HEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2021
    
    Date: 07-09-2021
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: HEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2021
    
    Date: 25-11-2021
    Business: As Court is busy in hearing argument in SU No.6910/78 and SU No.4289/19. Hence, Board is discharged.
    Matter is adjd. to 11.02.2022 for hearing without ws.
    Next Purpose: HEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 11-02-2022
    
    Date: 11-02-2022
    Business: Due to SOP only urgent matters are taken up.
    Matter is adjd. To 12.04.2022 for hearing without WS.
    Next Purpose: HEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 12-04-2022
    
    Date: 12-04-2022
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mangal Kadam present for defendant/MHADA.
    As plaintiff and his adv. are absent, Matter adjourned for RE to 24/06/22.
    Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2022
    
    Date: 24-06-2022
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mangal Kadam  for defendant is present and file pursis for treating reply dated 07/03/2020 filed by defendant as written statement of defendant. O: TOR. Marked Exh. 6.
    As plaintiff and his advocate is absent sine long.
    Matter adjourned for dismissal order to 12/07/2022..
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 12-07-2022
    
    Date: 12-07-2022
    Business: None present for Plff. Adv Mangal Kadam present for defendants/MHADA. LO at 12.15pm. None present for plff.  Issues framed at Exh.7. Adjd for R/E on 18.8.22.
    Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-08-2022
    
    Date: 18-08-2022
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv Mangal Kadam for defendant no.1 Mhada present.
    Matter adjourned for R.E./Order to 26.09.2022 .
    Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 26-09-2022
    
    Date: 26-09-2022
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mangal Kadam present for defendants/MHADA.
    As plaintiff and his adv. are absent, since long and did not adduce evidence, Matter adjourned for dismissal order to 15/10/22.
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2022
    
    Date: 15-10-2022
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mangal Kadam present for defendants/MHADA.
    From the record it appears that, plaintiff and his adv. Are absent since long and did not take steps to proceed further with the suit and did not adduce evidence. Therefore matter is kept for dismissal order. Today also plaintiff and his advocate are absent. From the above conduct of the plaintiff, it appears that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with the suit. Therefore, it will be appropriate to dismiss the suit as per Order 9 Rule 8 Of Code Of Civil Procedure. Hence, suit is dismissed as per Order 9 Rule 8 Of Code Of Civil Procedure. Proceeding is closed.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 15-10-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102127/2020
    Filing Date: 14-02-2020
    First Hearing Date: 07th March 2020
    Decision Date: 15th October 2022
    Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    15 Oct 2022
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: Daily Status
    IN THE COURT OF :COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :SUIT/0100515/2020
    Shafatulla Mehmoodulla Siddiqui Vs MHADA
    Date : 15-10-2022
    Business : None present for plaintiff. Adv. Mangal Kadam present for
    defendants/MHADA. From the record it appears that,
    plaintiff and his adv. Are absent since long and did not take
    steps to proceed further with the suit and did not adduce
    evidence. Therefore matter is kept for dismissal order.
    Today also plaintiff and his advocate are absent. From the
    above conduct of the plaintiff, it appears that plaintiff is not
    interested to proceed further with the suit. Therefore, it will
    be appropriate to dismiss the suit as per Order 9 Rule 8 Of
    Code Of Civil Procedure. Hence, suit is dismissed as per
    Order 9 Rule 8 Of Code Of Civil Procedure. Proceeding is
    closed.
    Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED
    Disposal Date : 15-10-2022
    COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.