Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01001996202003 Mar 2021
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 03 Mar 2021 · CNR MHCC010019962020

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: NM No.741-2020
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.741 OF 2020
IN
S.C. SUIT NO.2132 OF 2019
CNR NO.MHCC01-001996-2020
Avadhraj Motilal Gupta … Plaintiff
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
through the Senior Inspector of Police
M.P.B. Crime Branch, CID, Mumbai 400
001.
… Defendant
Appearances:
Ld. Adv S. B. Shrama for the plaintiff.
Ld. AGP Khatib for the defendant.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI. R. S. PAVASKAR
(C.R.NO.12)
DATED : 03rd MARCH 2021
ORAL ORDER
The defendant has taken out this notice of motion under
Order VIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
1908 (in short ‘CPC’) for the condonation of the delay in filing a
written statement.
Page 1 of 3
-- 1 of 3 --
NM No.741-2020
2. Heard the learned Advocates for the plaintiff and
defendant. Perused the notice of motion, the affidavit filed in support
thereof and the reply.
3. From the affidavit filed in support of the notice of motion,
it appears that on 05.08.2019, the plaintiff had served the letter of the
request upon the Government Pleader. The learned Assistant
Government Pleader submitted that as he did not get the required
information from the concerned department, it was not possible to file
a written statement within the time stipulated by this Court.
4. From para 3 of the reply, it is clear that during the
lockdown period arising out of the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic, the
Courts were entertaining only urgent matters.
5. Considering the above facts and in order to give an
opportunity to the defendant to put forth its defence, to my mind, it is
expedient in the interest of justice to allow it to file a written statement
by condoning the delay. At the same time, it is necessary to impose
costs on the defendant for the delay in filing a written statement. So, I
hold that the notice of motion deserves to be allowed in terms of the
prayer clause (a) subject to costs of Rs.100/-. Hence, the order:
ORDER
1. Notice of Motion No.741 of 2020 is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a) subject to costs of Rs.100/-
which shall be paid to the plaintiff.
Page 2 of 3
-- 2 of 3 --
NM No.741-2020
2. Notice of Motion No.741 of 2020 is accordingly
disposed of.
Sd/-
R. S. PAVASKAR
Judge,
Dated : 03/03/2021 City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay
Dictated on : 03/03/2021
Transcribed on : 03/03/2021
HHJ signed on : 03/03/2021
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
Upload Date Upload Time Name of Stenographer
04.03.2021 2.50 p.m. ARUN ANNAMALAI MUDALIYAR
Name of the Judge (With Court
Room No.)
HHJ Shri. R.S. PAVASKAR (CR 12)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGEMENT /ORDER
03.03.2021
JUDGEMENT /ORDER signed by
P.O. on
03.03.2021
JUDGEMENT /ORDER uploaded
on
04.03.2021
Page 3 of 3
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.