Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Apolina Charile Gowria and Ors.- Opponents- Deanna Sydney Gowria and Ors.VsVinod Makwana and Ors.

CNR MHCC0100199220204-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 04th March 2021

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100312/2020
Registration Date
15 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Apolina Charile Gowria and Ors.- Opponents- Deanna Sydney Gowria and Ors.

    Respondent

    1. 1Vinod Makwana and Ors.

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 26-03-2020
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 07-04-2020

Date: 07-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2020

Date: 18-04-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2020

Date: 29-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2020

Date: 16-06-2020
Business: Due to lock down case is adjd. to 11.08.2020
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2020

Date: 11-08-2020
Business: Adjd. to 29.09.2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2020

Date: 29-09-2020
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 07-01-2021

Date: 07-01-2021
Business: Adv. Ms. Ugale for plaintiff present and tendered Ch/s No. 312/20.
Pursuant to office order No. 166/2020 dtd. 27.11.2020 of Hon\''ble Principal Judge City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Bombay in view of standard operating procedure (SOP) dtd. 27.11.2020 of Hon\''ble Bombay High Court, after taking into account the present situation of COVID-19 pandemic, the matter is adjourned owing to absence of the party.
Adjd to 04.02.2021 for CH/s reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2021

Date: 04-02-2021
Business: Adv. Ugale for plaintiff present.
None for defendants.
On oral request of Ld. Adv. for plaintiff matter is adjourned.
Adjd to 04.03.2021 for Ch/s reply.
L.O. 11.50 a.m. at Defendant no. 1 present.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2021

Date: 04-03-2021
Business: Adv. Vaishali Ugale for plaintiff present.
Defendant no. 1 present and tendered affidavit in reply in CH/s no. 312/20.  Copy already served to other side.
Order on Ch/s no. 312/20
             Perused Ch/s, reply filed by def. no. 1.  It is stated that plaintiff no. 1 died on 08.01.2020 leaving behind the opponents as her LRs.  The def. no. 1 has objected the Ch/s by disputing the relation of the opponents with the deceased.  The defendant is not stating that the opponents are related to plaintiff no. 1.  Mere denial is not sufficient.  Therefore, Ch/s. no. 312/20  is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).  The plaint be amended accordingly before next date.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 04-03-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102160/2020
Filing Date: 15-02-2020
First Hearing Date: 26th March 2020
Decision Date: 04th March 2021
Court Number And Judge: 4-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    04 Mar 2021
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 4 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0100312/2020
Apolina Charile Gowria and Ors.- Opponents- Deanna Sydney Gowria and Ors. Vs Vinod
Makwana and Ors.
Date : 04-03-2021
Business : Adv. Vaishali Ugale for plaintiff present. Defendant no. 1
present and tendered affidavit in reply in CH/s no. 312/20.
Copy already served to other side. Order on Ch/s no.
312/20 Perused Ch/s, reply filed by def. no. 1. It is stated
that plaintiff no. 1 died on 08.01.2020 leaving behind the
opponents as her LRs. The def. no. 1 has objected the Ch/s
by disputing the relation of the opponents with the
deceased. The defendant is not stating that the opponents
are related to plaintiff no. 1. Mere denial is not sufficient.
Therefore, Ch/s. no. 312/20 is allowed in terms of prayer
clause (a). The plaint be amended accordingly before next
date.
Nature of Disposal : ALLOWED
Disposal Date : 04-03-2021
COURT 4 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.