Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr. Yogesh Tavaji GoruleVsMCGM

CNR MHCC01001978201811-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 03rd May 2019

TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100499/2018
Registration Date
07 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Yogesh Tavaji Gorule

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 21-03-2018
Business: As court is busy in dictating Judgment in SU no. 8793/98, mediation matter and other matters on board. Hence, board is discharged.
Matter adjd to 20.06.2018.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2018

Date: 20-04-2018
Business: As court is busy in dictating Judgment in SU no. 8793/98, mediation matter and other matters on board. Hence, board is discharged.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2018

Date: 20-06-2018
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2018

Date: 13-08-2018
Business: Court is vacant. Hence today board is discharged.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2018

Date: 10-10-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2018

Date: 17-12-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2019

Date: 04-03-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Jain h/f adv. Kudalkar for Plaintiff present and submitted that, Plaintiff is intending to withdraw the suit, hence matter may be adjourned.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present and NM reply-cum-Written Statement t.o.r. Copy served upon Plaintiff\''s advocate.
Considering submissions made by advocate for Plaintiff, case is adjourned to 10/04/2019 for filing withdrawal pursis by Plaintiff.
It is made clear that if on next date, Plaintiff will not file pursis for withdrawal of suit, Court will have to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2019

Date: 10-04-2019
Business: Case is adjourned to 03.05.2019 for withdrawal/ dismissal of the suit.
Next Purpose: WITHDRAWAL
Next Hearing Date: 03-05-2019

Date: 03-05-2019
Business: Advocate Jain h/f adv. Kudalkar for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for defendant/MCGM present.
Adv. for plaintiff submitted that the plaintiff is not in contact and therefore the withdrawal pursis can not be filed.
Considering submissions, it is clear that the plaintiff has lost interest in the proceedings. The N/M is ripe for hearing. However, the registered NM is not  tendered and is not being argued. Hence, the NM no. 499/18 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 03-05-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102105/2018
Filing Date: 07-02-2018
First Hearing Date: 21st March 2018
Decision Date: 03rd May 2019
Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    03 May 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Advocate Jain h/f adv. Kudalkar for plaintiff present. Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for
defendant/MCGM present. Adv. for plaintiff submitted that the plaintiff is not in
contact and therefore the withdrawal pursis can not be filed. Considering
submissions, it is clear that the plaintiff has lost interest in the proceedings. The N/M
is ripe for hearing. However, the registered NM is not tendered and is not being
argued. Hence, the NM no. 499/18 is dismissed for want of prosecution. The Case is
adjd. To 30.07.2019 for draft issues.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    03 May 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Advocate Jain h/f adv. Kudalkar for plaintiff present. Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for
defendant/MCGM present. Adv. for plaintiff submitted that the plaintiff is not in
contact and therefore the withdrawal pursis can not be filed. Considering
submissions, it is clear that the plaintiff has lost interest in the proceedings. The N/M
is ripe for hearing. However, the registered NM is not tendered and is not being
argued. Hence, the NM no. 499/18 is dismissed for want of prosecution. The Case is
adjd. To 30.07.2019 for draft issues.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.