Order Details: Other Pdf Text: MHCC010019702020 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY TRANSFER APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2020 IN SUIT NO.8414 OF 2000 Ahura Mazda Dairy Farm Pvt. Ltd. ... Applicant (Org.Defendant) Versus M/s.Kwality Food & Masala Products ... Respondent (Org.Plaintiff) CORAM: CORAM: H.H.THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE SMT.V.V.JOSHI (C.R.No.19) DATED: 27th JULY, 2022 Adv.Swati Sagvekar for applicant. Adv.Yaya Ghogari for respondent. . ORAL ORDER 1. The applicant/original defendant has filed this application to transfer the Suit No.8414…
Ahura Mazda Dairy Farm Pvt. Ltd.- Applicant (Org. Defendant)VsKwality Food and Masala Products - Respondent (Org. Plaintiff)
TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100039/2020
- Registration Date
- 14 Feb 2020
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 28-02-2020 Business: Adv. Swati Sagvekar for applicant is present. Adjourned to 11.03.2020 for filing affidavit of service. Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2020 Date: 11-03-2020 Business: Adv. Swati Sagvekar for applicant is present and filed affidavit of service. TOR and marked as Exh.2. None present for respondent. Adjourned to 18.03.2020 for Reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 18-03-2020 Date: 18-03-2020 Business: None present for the parties. Adjourned to 31.03.2020 for Reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 31-03-2020 Date: 31-03-2020 Business: adjourned Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2020 Date: 17-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 06-05-2020 Date: 06-05-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 03-06-2020 Date: 03-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2020 Date: 20-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 09-07-2020 Date: 09-07-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2020 Date: 04-08-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2020 Date: 03-09-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2020 Date: 29-09-2020 Business: Both sides absent. Due to COVID-19 adjourned to 07.10.2020 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2020 Date: 07-10-2020 Business: Both sides absent. Due to COVID-19, adjourned to 31.10.2020 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 31-10-2020 Date: 31-10-2020 Business: Both sides absent. Due to COVID-19 adjourned to 10.11.2020 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 10-11-2020 Date: 10-11-2020 Business: Both sides absent. Respondent to file reply on next date positively. Adjourned to 10.12.2020 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2020 Date: 10-12-2020 Business: Adv. Swati Sagvekar for applicant is present. Adv. Bhakti Bhanushali i/b Sonal Doshi and Co for respondent is present. Advocate for respondent seeks time to file reply. By way of last opportunity time granted. Adjourned to 15.12.2020 for Reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2020 Date: 15-12-2020 Business: None preset for applicant. Adv. Kaustubh Patil a/w Adv. Bhakti Bhanushali i/b Sonal Doshi and Co for respondent and filed reply. TOR and marked as Exh.3. Since nobody appears for applicant, again by way of last opportunity, matter is adjourned to 06.01.2021 for Hearing. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2021 Date: 06-01-2021 Business: Adv. Swati Sagvekar for applicant is present. Adv. P. D. Gandhy a/w Adv. Bhakti Bhanushali i/b Sonal Doshi and Co for respondent present. Ld. counsel for the respondent seeks time to take instructions as to whether the present suit can be transferred to the court which is also designated as a MPID Court by keeping the point open for the said court to be decided as to whether it has to deal with the suit as a civil court or as a designated court or for that matter any provisions of MPID act are to be applied or invoked in the suit. Adjourned to 13.01.2021 for Hearing. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2021 Date: 13-01-2021 Business: None present for applicant. Adv. Bhakti Bhanushali i/b Sonal Doshi and Co for respondent is present. Since nobody appears for applicant and Ld. counsel for respondent seeks time, matter adjourned to 19.01.2021 for Hearing. L.O. Adv. Swati Sagvekar for applicant is present. Adv. P. D. Gandhy for respondent is present. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 19-01-2021 Date: 19-01-2021 Date: 19-07-2022 Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2022 Date: 19-07-2022 Business: CORAM - HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, SMT. VRUSHALI. V. JOSHI (C.R. NO.19) Adv. Swati Sagvekar for appellant is present. Adv. Yahya Ghoghari for respondent is present. The applicant appeared in this case and filed the authenticated copy of the order of Hon\''ble High Court. The directions are given in said case to appear before this court on 19th and to reconsider the application seeking transfer of the suit to the designated court after hearing the parties. Call the record of this proceeding from Court No.7. Adjourned on 25.07.2022 for Hearing. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 25-07-2022 Date: 25-07-2022 Business: CORAM - HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, SMT. VRUSHALI. V. JOSHI (C.R. NO.19) Writ received from the Honble High Court in Civil Revision Application No.43 of 2021 vide D. D. (CRA) No. C0717237/2022 dt. 20.07.2022 wherein following order is passed on 15.07.2022 - Date - 15th July, 2022 P.C. - 8. I have no option but to set aside the order impugned and to request the learned Trial Judge to reconsider the application seeking transfer of the suit to the designated Court, after hearing the parties. 9. The learned Trial Judge is requested to decide the application seeking transfer within 30 days from the appearance of the parties. 10. The parties shall appear before the Trial Judge on 19th July, 2022 without expecting any formal notice. 11. The parties and the learned Trial Judge shall act on the authenticated copy of this order. Note is taken in the Roznama and compliance is most humbly submitted to the Honble High Court. KB L.O. at 01.50pm. Adv. Swati Sagvekar for applicant present. Adv. Yahya Ghogari i/b Sonal Doshi and Co for respondent present. As court is busy in hearing final arguments in Misc. Appeal No.98/09, matter is adjourned on 26.07.2022 at 02.45pm for Hearing. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2022 Date: 26-07-2022 Business: CORAM - HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, SMT. VRUSHALI. V. JOSHI (C.R. NO.19) Adv. Swati Sagvekar for applicant present. Adv. Yahya Ghogari a/w Adv. Shivani Bhate i/b Sonal Doshi and Co for respondent present. Heard Adv. Sagvekar for applicant and Adv. Ghogari for respondent. Also heard arguments in reply. Adjourned on 27.07.2022 for Order. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2022 Date: 27-07-2022 Business: CORAM - HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, SMT. VRUSHALI. V. JOSHI (C.R. NO.19) Adv. Swati Sagvekar for applicant present. Adv. Yahya Ghoghari i/b Sonal Doshi and Co for respondent present. As per the directions of Honble High Court as the order on said transfer application is set aside, the matter is heard fresh and as such transfer application is restored on 19.07.2022. F.R.S.R. Following order is passed. ORDER Transfer Application No.39 of 2020 is hereby rejected. R and P (Suit No.8414/2000) be returned back to Court No.7. Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED Disposal Date: 27-07-2022
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 102064/2020 Filing Date: 13-02-2020 First Hearing Date: 28th February 2020 Decision Date: 27th July 2022 Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
Orders
3Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY TRANSFER APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2020 IN SUIT No.8414 OF 2000 Ahura Mazda Dairy Farm Pvt.Ltd. ... Applicant (Org.Defendant) Versus M/s. Kwality Food & Masala Products ... Respondent (Org.Plaintiff) CORAM: H.H.THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE S. B. AGRAWAL (C.R.No.19) DATED: 19th JANUARY, 2021 Adv. Swati Sagvekar, for applicant/Org.Defendant Adv. P. D. Gandhy i/b. Sonal Doshi & Co., for respondent/Org.Plaintiff. ORAL ORDER Defendant in Suit No.8414 of 2000…
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY TRANSFER APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2020 IN SUIT No.8414 OF 2000 Ahura Mazda Dairy Farm Pvt.Ltd. ... Applicant (Org.Defendant) Versus M/s. Kwality Food & Masala Products ... Respondent (Org.Plaintiff) CORAM: H.H.THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE S. B. AGRAWAL (C.R.No.19) DATED: 19th JANUARY, 2021 Adv. Swati Sagvekar, for applicant/Org.Defendant Adv. P. D. Gandhy i/b. Sonal Doshi & Co., for respondent/Org.Plaintiff. ORAL ORDER Defendant in Suit No.8414 of 2000…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
