Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Ananda Keshav YadavVsThe Chairman/Secretary +1 more

CNR MHCC01001942202062-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 16th February 2022

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100853/2020
Registration Date
20 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    2
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 38 · 39
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 2 · Order 39 · Rule 1

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 12-03-2020
    Business: Advocate Mr. Sandeep Dhankar for Plaintiff present and sought time to serve writ of summons upon Defendants.  Issue writ of summons as prayed.
    Case is adjourned to 17/07/2020 for service.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 17-07-2020
    
    Date: 17-07-2020
    Business: matter is adjd. to 17.09.2020 due to Covid-19.
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2020
    
    Date: 17-09-2020
    Business: None present for Plaintiff.
    None present for Defendants.
    Due to Corona pandemic, it seems that parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 10/12/2020.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2020
    
    Date: 10-12-2020
    Business: None present for Plaintiffs.
    None present for Defendants.
    It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 24/02/2021 for service.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2021
    
    Date: 24-02-2021
    Business: None present for both the parties.
    Plff to file affidavit of service of writ of summons.
    Matter is adjd. for affidavit of service to 09.06.2021.
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 09-06-2021
    
    Date: 09-06-2021
    Business: Due to covid adjourned
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2021
    
    Date: 06-08-2021
    Business: Presiding Officer is on half day leave.
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2021
    
    Date: 14-10-2021
    Business: None present for both parties.
    Plff has not filed affidavit of service of writ of summons till date.
    As nobody is present for the plff, matter be kept for dismissal order on next date.
    Matter is adjd. for dismissal order to 22.12.2021.
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 22-12-2021
    
    Date: 22-12-2021
    Business: court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2022
    
    Date: 16-02-2022
    Business: None present for plff.
    K.B.
    L.O. at 1.40 p.m.
    None appeared for the plff despite keeping back the matter till 1.40 p.m. Despite granting several  opportunities, plaintiff has failed to serve the defendants with writ of summons. There is no propriety to keep the matter pending any further at same stage in absence of the plaintiff hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
    Proceeding is closed.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
    Disposal Date: 16-02-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102066/2020
    Filing Date: 13-02-2020
    First Hearing Date: 12th March 2020
    Decision Date: 16th February 2022
    Court Number And Judge: 62-COURT 62 AD-HOC  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    16 Feb 2022
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 16/02/2022 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI P.P.RAJVAIDYA (C.R. NO.62)
    11
    SU 853/2020
    None present for plff.
    K.B.
    L.O. at 1.40 p.m.
    None appeared for the plff despite keeping back the matter till 1.40
    p.m. Despite granting several opportunities, plaintiff has failed to
    serve the defendants with writ of summons. There is no propriety to
    keep the matter pending any further at same stage in absence of the
    plaintiff hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
    Proceeding is closed.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.