SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Parveen Bano W/o. Mohamed Akhlaque Ansari +1 moreVsMohammed Afzal Abdul Bafati +1 more
CNR MHCC0100192120192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100652/2019
- Registration Date
- 11 Mar 2019
- Next Hearing Date
- 06 Oct 2026
- Case Stage
- ADMISSION DENIAL
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Acts & Sections
1Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 31
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 01-04-2019 Business: Adv. Meenaz Ansari for Plaintiff present. K.B. L.O. Adv. Prashant Aher for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Affidavit of service filed by Plaintiff t.o.r. Plff tendered draft NM t.o.r. Leave is granted to register it. Copy be given to other side. K.B. L.O. Ex.2 Adv. Mishra filed V/n for Defendant no.1 t.o.r. Ex.3 He filed written statement t.o.r. Ex.4 Adv. Waghchoure filed V/n for Defendant no.2 t.o.r. Adj for reply and hearing to 11.04.2019. Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 11-04-2019 Date: 11-04-2019 Business: Adv. Prashant Ahire for Plaintiff present. Adv. Gaurav Tiwari for Defendant no.1 present. Adv. Sharad Waghchoure for Defendant no.2 present. K.B. L.O. Adv. Jayesh Bhat for Defendant no.1 present. He made statement that written statement filed by defendant no.1 be treated as reply to notice of motion. Adv for Plaintiff made statement that he is not going to file any rejoinder to written statement-cum-reply. Plaintiff is directed to get registered NM and file original NM on record. Adj for reply of defendant no.2 and NM hearing to 15.04.2019. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2019 Date: 15-04-2019 Business: Adv. Prashant Ahire for Plaintiff present. Adv. Jayesh Bhat for Defendant no.1 present. Adv. Sharad Waghchoure for Defendant no.2 present. Ex.5 Written statement filed by adv for Defendant no.2. Adv for Defendant no.2 submitted that WS filed by them be treated as reply to NM. Original NM no.1556/19 tendered by Plaintiff t.o.r. Adv. for Plaintiffs submitted that Plaintiff does not want to file rejoinder to the said reply. K.B. L.O. Heard arguments of Adv for Plaintiff and Defendant no.1. Adj for arguments of Defendant no.2 to 20.04.2019. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2019 Date: 20-04-2019 Business: Adv. Minaz Ansari for Plaintiff present. Adv. Jayesh Bhat for Defendant no.1 present. Heard arguments of Adv for defendant no.1 and reply argument of Adv for Plaintiff on NM 1556/19. Adj for NM order to 02.05.2019. Next Purpose: NM ORDERS Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2019 Date: 02-05-2019 Business: Adv. Imran Shaikh for Plaintiff present. Deft and Adv absent. K.B. L.O. As Court is busy in other matters, hence adj for NM order to 03.05.2019. Next Purpose: NM ORDERS Next Hearing Date: 03-05-2019 Date: 03-05-2019 Business: Adv. Meenaz Ansari I/b Adv. Imran Shaikh for Plaintiff present. Deft and Adv absent. K.B. L.O. As Court is busy in dictating orders in other matters, hence adj for order to 04.05.2019. Next Purpose: NM ORDERS Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2019 Date: 04-05-2019 Business: Adv. Meenaz Ansari for Plaintiff present. Deft and Adv absent. K.B. L.O. FRSR following order is passed in NM no.1556/19. ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No.1556 of 2019 is partly allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). 2. Accordingly, notice of motion is disposed off. adj for service to 17.07.2019. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 17-07-2019 Date: 17-07-2019 Business: Plff and Adv absent. Deft and Adv absent. Adj for framing issues to 05.09.2019. Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2019 Date: 05-09-2019 Business: Adv. Ms. Ansari for Plaintiff present. Adv. Waghchoure for defendant present. Adv for defendant sought time to file draft issues. Adj for framing issues to 06.11.2019. Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2019 Date: 06-11-2019 Business: None present. Adjourned for issues to 6.01.2020 Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2020 Date: 06-01-2020 Business: As Court is on leave, hence board is discharged and matter is adjourned. Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 11-02-2020 Date: 11-02-2020 Business: Both parties and their Adv absent. Clerk of Adv for deft no. 2 filed draft issues. t.o.r. Matter stands Adj for draft issues to 07/04/2020. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 07-04-2020 Date: 07-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2020 Date: 18-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2020 Date: 29-05-2020 Business: National Lockdown Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2020 Date: 16-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2020 Date: 06-10-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2020 Date: 09-12-2020 Business: None present. Matter stands Adj for Draft issues to 28/01/2021. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2021 Date: 28-01-2021 Business: None present. Matter stands Adj for Draft Issues to 19/03/2021. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2021 Date: 19-03-2021 Business: None for plff. Deft no. 1 present. Adv Gaurav Tiwari for deft no. 1 present. Matter stands Adj for Draft Issues to 14/06/2021. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 14-06-2021 Date: 14-06-2021 Business: Due to Covid - 19 Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2021 Date: 27-07-2021 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 15-09-2021 Date: 15-09-2021 Business: Adv Meenaz Dusari for plff present. She filed draft Issues. Adv Jayesh Bhat for deft no. 1 present. Matter stands Adj to 21/12/2021 for Draft Issues by deft. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 21-12-2021 Date: 21-12-2021 Business: Adv Meenaz Ansari for plff present. None for defts. Plff and deft no. 2 already filed draft issues. Deft no. 1 is directed to file draft issues. Matter stands Adj for Draft issues by deft no. 1 to 18/03/2022. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2022 Date: 19-03-2022 Business: Adv. Vikas Gupta for plaintiff present. None for defendant. Matter stands Adj for draft issues on 18.06.2022. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 18-06-2022 Date: 18-06-2022 Business: P.O. is on leave. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2022 Date: 26-08-2022 Business: None for plaintiff present. Adv. Umar Dalvi appeared for defendant no. 2. He filed V/p Exh 6 TOR Parties are directed to give CTS number of suit property. Matter is adjd for draft issue to 15/11/2022. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2022 Date: 15-11-2022 Business: PO is on leave. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 03-02-2023 Date: 03-02-2023 Business: None for plaintiff present. Adv. Abdula for defendant no. 2 present. Defendant no. 1 present. Draft issue not filed. Matter adjourned for draft issue to 21/04/2023. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2023 Date: 21-04-2023 Business: Adv. Prince Kumar Upadhyay h/f Ansari for plaintiff present. Adv. Karan Ankolekar h/f Jayesh Bhatt for defendant no. 1 present. Adv. Abdullah M. h/f Rajendra Rathod for defendant no. 2 present. Both seek time to file draft issue. Time granted as last chance. Matter adjourned for draft issue to 08/08/2023. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2023 Date: 08-08-2023 Business: Advocate Mr. Karan Ankolekar for defendant no. 1 present and he tendered draft issues. He is directed to serve on other side. Plaintiff and advocate absent. Matter adjourned for draft issues on 09.10.2023. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2023 Date: 19-08-2023 Business: (NOB-TOB for placing the matter before National Lok-Adalat will be held on 09/09/2023.) Matter is referred to National Lok-Adalat as there is a possibility of settlement in the matter. Both parties are directed to remain present before National Lok-Adalat to be held on 09.09.2023 at 10.00 a.m. Issue notice to both parties to remain present before National-Lok-Adalat. Matter is adj. to 09/09/2023 for National Lok-Adalat. Matter is already adjourned for draft issues on 09.10.2023. Next Purpose: Lok-Nyayalay Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2023 Date: 09-09-2023 Business: Both parties are absent. Matter is not settled. Case is adjourned to 19/12/2023. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2023 Date: 19-12-2023 Business: Advocate for plaintiff absent. Advocate Meenaz Mozawala for defendant no.2 present. Matter adjourned for draft issues on 08.02.2024. L.O. Adv. M. B. Shaikh i/b Ansari for plaintiff present. Matter adjourned for draft issues on 08.02.2024. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2024 Date: 08-02-2024 Business: Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar Upadhyay h.f. Advocate Meenaz Ansari for plaintiff present. Advocate Ms. Meenaz Mozawala h.f Advocate Rajendra R. for defendant no. 2 present and seeks time. O- Granted. Matter adjourned for draft issues on 30.03.2024. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 30-03-2024 Date: 30-03-2024 Business: Plaintiff absent. Advocate Mr. Abdullah for defendant no. 2 present. Matter adjourned for draft issues on 04.07.2024. Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2024 Date: 04-07-2024 Business: Plaintiff present. Advocate Ms. Meenaz Ansar for plaintiff present. Advocate Mr.Mujtaba Shaikh h.f. Mr. Rajendra Rathod for defendant no. 2 present and tendered draft issues. Copy served to other side. Matter is adjourned for framing issues on 13.09.2024. Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 13-09-2024 Date: 13-09-2024 Business: Plaintiff and advocate absent. Advocate Mr. Ansari Modssir Siraj a/w Umar Dalvi h.f. Rajendra Rathod for defendant no. 2 present. Issues framed and marked as Exhibit-7. Matter is adjourned for Recording Evidence on 04.11.2024. Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2024 Date: 04-11-2024 Business: Advocate Mr. Upadhyay for plaintiff present and seeks time. O- Granted. Advocate Sameer Merchant for defendant no. 2 present. Matter is adjourned for Recording Evidence on 17.03.2025. Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2025 Date: 17-03-2025 Business: Advocate Aryan Survase for plaintiff present and seeks time. O- Granted. Advocate Sameer Merchant for defendant no. 2 present. Matter is adjourned for Recording Evidence on 09.07.2025. Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 09-07-2025 Date: 09-07-2025 Business: Advocate Pratik Pali i/b Advocate Minaz Ansari for plaintiff is present. He seeks time. None for defendant no. 1. Advocate Umar Dalvi for defendant no. 2 is present. Matter adjourned to 25.09.2025 for filing affidavit of evidence and documents by plaintiff. Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2025 Date: 25-09-2025 Business: Advocate Prince Upadhyay i/b Meenaz Ansari for plaintiff is present. He seeks time to file evidence affidavit. Granted as a last chance. None present for defendant no. 1. Advocate Bilal Maknojia h.f. Advocate Rajendra Rathod for defendant no. 2 is present. Matter adjourned to 04.10.2025 for Recording Evidence. Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 04-10-2025 Date: 04-10-2025 Business: Advocate Meenaz Ansari for plaintiff is present. Advocate Shoeib Ahmed for defendant is present. Kept back Later on at 1.25 P.M. Advocate Meenaz Ansari for plaintiff is present. None present for defendant no. 1. Advocate Jeshan Sardar for defendant no. 2 is present. Plaintiff no. 1 tendered her affidavit in lieu of examination in chief. Taken on record and marked as Exhibit-8. O- Read and recorded. Oath is administered to the witness. She identified her signs and admitted entire contents of her evidence affidavit at Exhibit-8 to be true and correct. Copy is served upon advocate of defendant no. 2. It be served upon defendants no.1. Plaintiff also tendered list alongwith documents. List is TOR and marked as Exhibit-9. Copy is served upon advocate of defendant no. 2. It be served upon defendant no.1. O- Other side to say. Matter adjourned to 13.11.2025 for filing Reply on document at Exhibit-9 (Admission / Denial). Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2025 Date: 13-11-2025 Business: P.O IS ON LEAVE Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL Next Hearing Date: 22-01-2026 Date: 22-01-2026 Business: None present for plaintiff. Advocate Mr. M.N. Shaikh for defendant no. 1 is present. He filed vakalatnama. TOR and marked as Exhibit-__. O- Filed. Advocate Ansari Mudasir for defendant no. 2 is present. Advocate Prince Kumar Upadhyay for plaintiff is present. Matter adjourned to 16.03.2026 for Admission/ Denial. Later on at 1.00 P.M. Advocate Prince Kumar Upadhyay for plaintiff is present. Matter adjourned to 16.03.2026 for Admission/ Denial. Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2026 Date: 16-03-2026 Business: None for plaintiff is present. Advocate Fawzan for defendant no.1 is present. Advocate Umar Dalvi for defendant no. 2 is present. Matter adjourned to 17.06.2026 for Admission / Denial. Later on at 12.15 P.M. Advocate Mr. M.B. Shaikh i/b Advocate Meenaz Ansari for plaintiff is present. Matter adjourned to 17.06.2026 for Admission / Denial. Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2026 Date: 17-06-2026 Business: Advocate Prince Kumar Upadhaya a/w Meenaz Ansari for plaintiff is present. Advocate M.M. Shaikh h.f. Fauzan Shaikh for defendant no. 1 is present. Advocate Umar Dalvi for defendant no. 2 is present. As Learned advocate for defendant no.2 submitted that no copies are served to him, the Learned advocate for plaintiff has shown his readiness to serve the copy to defendant no. 1. Defendant no. 2 was already served with the copy. Now both the defendants shall make their submissions on admissions / denial on next date without fail. Matter adjourned to 21.08.2026 for Admissions / Denial. Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2026 Date: 21-08-2026 Business: CORAM COURT IS ON LEAVE FIRST SESSION (COURT ROOM NO.2) Advocate Parth Keni i/b Prince Kumar Upadhyay for plaintiff is present. Advocate Fauzan for defendant no. 1 is present. Advocate Sohail Ahmed a/w Ayesha Lakdawala for defendant no. 2 is present. Matter adjourned to 06.10.2026 for Admission / Denial. Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 102060/2019 Filing Date: 18-02-2019 First Hearing Date: 01st April 2019 Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Interim Order 113 Sept 2024
13 Sept 2024
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: C.R.NO. 02 DATED 13/09/2024 : 1 : Exhibit - 7 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GR. MUMBAI SU 652 of 2019 Parveen Bano W/o. Mohammed Akhlaque Ansari … Plaintiffs Versus Mohammed Afzal Abdul Bafati and Another ... Defendants I S S U E S 1. Whether Plaintiff prove that an agreement dated 11.04.2006 executed between Defendant no. 1 and 2 is null and void ? 2. Whether this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit in view of rights claimed in the suit premises or the basic of tenancy rights ? 3. Whether the suit is bad in law and not maintainable for want of non-joiner of necessary parties, i.e. MHADA in the present suit ? 4. Whether the suit is liable to be dismissed for want of payment of proper court fees in the present suit ? 5. Whether the plaintiff prove that the plaintiff are entitled to injunction against Defendant no. 1 from evicting / dispossessing the plaintiffs from the suit premises ? 6. What order and decree? Sd/- (R.V. BHAKTA) City Civil Judge, Date: 13.09.2024 Gr. Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
Order 113 Sept 2024
13 Sept 2024
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: C.R.NO. 02 DATED 13/09/2024 : 1 : Exhibit - 7 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GR. MUMBAI SU 652 of 2019 Parveen Bano W/o. Mohammed Akhlaque Ansari … Plaintiffs Versus Mohammed Afzal Abdul Bafati and Another ... Defendants I S S U E S 1. Whether Plaintiff prove that an agreement dated 11.04.2006 executed between Defendant no. 1 and 2 is null and void ? 2. Whether this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit in view of rights claimed in the suit premises or the basic of tenancy rights ? 3. Whether the suit is bad in law and not maintainable for want of non-joiner of necessary parties, i.e. MHADA in the present suit ? 4. Whether the suit is liable to be dismissed for want of payment of proper court fees in the present suit ? 5. Whether the plaintiff prove that the plaintiff are entitled to injunction against Defendant no. 1 from evicting / dispossessing the plaintiffs from the suit premises ? 6. What order and decree? Sd/- (R.V. BHAKTA) City Civil Judge, Date: 13.09.2024 Gr. Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
