Shaikh Abdul Sattar Abdul HaqVsFiroz Hanif Shaikh and Ors.

Date: 21-02-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. S. K. Dubey for Plaintiff present.
None present for Defendant no.1 to 3.
Advocate Ms. Hajare for BMC/Deft present.
Learned advocate for Plaintiff referred page no.28 the notice issued by BMC u/s 354 of BMC to one Tarannum Khan and argued that by said notice Tarannum Khan was directed to vacate building immediately and after vacating provide propping and take preventive measures under supervision of registered structural engineer.  It is argued that Plaintiff is adjoining property holder of property referred in said notice.  Defendant nos.1 and 2 are contractors who have demolished previous structure referred in said notice and they are constructing total new structure in the place of building referred in said notice.  If Defendant no.1 and 2 will make illegal construction on the place referred in said notice, said structure may collapse at any time on Plaintiff\''s property or Defendant nos.1 and 2 may open windows from said construction towards property of Plaintiff hence Plaintiff is intending that injunction as prayed in Notice of Motion.  Learned advocate for Plaintiff referred page no.34 of Written Statement Exh.3 and referred recommendations of structural auditor from said page.  By those recommendations structural auditors has not recommended for construction of new building.  Plaintiff has filed rejoinder to Written Statement and contended that Defendant nos.1 and 2 are not owners of the property in which new construction is being made.  It is pointed out that Defendant no.1 and 2 have admitted in their Written Statement that they are not owners of the property were new construction is being made.  Learned advocate for Plaintiff referred photographs filed on recording and submitted that, said photographs shows ongoing construction, hence injunction as prayed in NM is necessary to be granted.
Advocate Ms. Ansari Roshan h/f Adv. Siddhiqui for Defendant no.1 to 3 submitted that, advocate Mr. Siddhiqui is busy in CR no.1, hence matter may be kept back.
L.O.
Advocate Mr. Siddhiqui for Defendant no.1 and 2 filed original NM No.741/19 with affidavit in support, t.o.r.
Court is busy in hearing argument in suit no.1753/16 and court has to pass Notice of Motion order as well as urgent matters, hence case is adjourned to 27/02/2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2019

Date: 27-02-2019
Business: None present for Plaintiff.
Advocate Ms. Poonam Tiwari for Defendant no.1 to 3 present
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present.
K.B.
L.O.
Advocate Mr. S. K. Dubey for Plaintiff present and filed say to NM NO.741/19 itself.
Advocate Mr. Siddhiqui for Defendant no.1 no.3 present
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present.
Heard advocate Mr. Siddhiqui about NM 741/19 who has pointed out that Plaintiff has claimed relief of injunction restraining Defendant no.1 and 2 from making construction in property bearing CTS no.657 and owner of CTS no.657 is not added as party to the suit.  It is further pointed out that disputed notice filed at page no.28 of the suit shows that BMC has issued said notice to Smt. Tarannum Khan and said Tarannum Khan also is not made party to the suit.  It is further argued that there were 36 tenans in the building namely Ayesha Building which was to be repaired as per the notice issued by BMC.  Those tenants are also not made party to the suit, hence Plaintiff can not get any relief interim relief in this suit.  When court has pointed out that section 9A of CPC is repealed advocate Mr. Siddhiqui submitted that, no interim relief should be granted in the suit considering submissions made by him.
In reply Learned advocate for Plaintiff strongly argued that Plaintiff is not knowing name of owner of CTS no.657 and Defendant no.1 and 2 should file the copy of agreement executed by owner of CTS no.657 in their favour.  It is further argued that if such a document will be file Plaintiff will come to know that whether Defendant s have authority to make constructions on CTS no.657.
Considering submissions made at bar, advocate Mr. Siddhiqui for  Defendant no.1 to 3 are directed to produce before the Court the document of authority executed by owner of CTS no.657 in their favour for authorizing them to make construction/repair in CTS no.657, thereafter, order on NM no.741/19 will be passed and hearing of NM No.4843/18 will be heard.
Case is adjourned to 02/03/2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2019

Date: 02-03-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. S. K. Dubey for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Hajare for BMC/Deft present.
Defendant no.1 to 3 and their advocate absent.
Defendant no.1 to 3 have not complied order dated 27/02/2019, hence case is adjourned to 12.03.2019  for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2019

Date: 12-03-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Rathi for Plaintiff present
Advocate for BMC/Deft present.
Advocate Mr. Siddhiqui for Defendant no.1 to 3 present and submitted list of documents Exh.5.  Copy of agreement filed with said list shows that original owner Tarannum Khan owner of Ayesha Manzil has appointed contractor Defendant no.1 for development of the building namely Ayesha Manzil.  Defendant no.2 is brother of Defendant no.1.  As such Defendant no.1 and 2 have made it clear that they are authorized by original landlord to develop suit property.  In such circumstances unless Plaintiff impleads original landlord as party to the suit no ad-interim relief can be granted in favour of Plaintiff because it will amount to grant ex-parte order without giving opportunity to original landlord to explain the allegations made in the plaint.  Hence Plaintiff is directed Under Order 10 Rule 2 of CPC to implead original landlord Tarannum Khan as Defendant in this suit because in her absence no decree can be passed.
Case is adjourned to 19/03/2019 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2019

Date: 19-03-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2019

Date: 26-03-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Rizvi for Plaintiff present and filed Vakalatnama, t.o.r.  He also filed draft chamber summons along with affidavit in support. Leave granted.
Advocate Ms. Chavan for BMC/Deft present.
Advocate Ms. Tamanna Khan for Defendant no.1 to 3 present and also accepted service of Chamber Summons for proposed Defendant landlord.
Case is adjourned to 04/04/2019 for Chamber Summons reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 04-04-2019

Date: 04-04-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 11-04-2019

Date: 11-04-2019
Business: The case is adjourned to 25.04.2019 for compliance.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 25-04-2019

Date: 25-04-2019
Business: None for plaintiff.
Advocate Ms.Hajare for defendant/MCGM present.
KB
LO at 3.20pm
Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present filed affidavit of service of Deft. nos. 1 to 5 and additional affidavit TOR.
Adv. Punam Tiwari for Defendant. no. 1 to 3 present.
Advocate Ms.Hajare for defendant no.4/MCGM present.
Perusal of affidavit of service reveals that the postal acknowledgment are not filed with it. Advocate for defendants 1 to 4 and The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai admits service of amended plaint. Plaintiff is directed to complete the service on defendant no.5 as the advocate appearing for defendants 1 to 4 can not be compelled to represent defendant no.5 in absence of instructions, as pleaded by advocate for defendants 1 to 4.
The Case is adjd. To 02.05.2019  for  compliance.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2019

Date: 02-05-2019
Business: The Case is adjd. To 07.06.2019   for Commissioner\''s report.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 07-06-2019

Date: 07-06-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Rizvi for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms.Roshan Ansari for defendant nos. 1 to 3 present.
Advocate Mr.Giri for defendant/MCGM present.
Commissioner report TOR and marked as Exh. 8
Adv. for Plaintiff filed additional affidavit of NM. TOR.
Copy of additional affidavit served on other side.
The case is adjourned to 15.06.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2019

Date: 15-06-2019
Business: As court is on leave. Hence board is discharged.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2019

Date: 20-06-2019
Business: Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present and filed additional affidavit TOR.
Adv.Ms. Punam Tiwari h/f adv. Siddiqui for defendants no. 1 to 3 present.
Advocate Ms.Mhatre for defendant no. 4/MCGM present.
KB
LO at 4.30pm
Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present
Adv. Dubey h/f adv. V.T.Dubey for applicants present and filed draft chamber summons along with affidavit in support. T.O.R. Leave is granted to register Chamber Summons.
Copy of draft ch/s and affidavit is served on the advocate for plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. Siddiqui for defendants no. 1 to 3 sought time to tender reply to the additional affidavit filed by the plaintiff today. He undertakes to serve the copy of reply on the adv. for plaintiff two days in advance before next date.
The statement is accepted adjd. For reply and hearing.
The case is adjourned to 27.06.2019 for Ch.s reply.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-06-2019

Date: 27-06-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Rizvi for plaintiff present and filed reply to Chamber Summons and two rejoinders to reply by defts. no. 1 to 3.
Advocate Mr. Siddiqui for defendant no. 1 to 3 present and filed reply to additional affidavit dated 15.06.2019 tendered by plaintiff.
Advocate Ms.Mhatre for defendant/MCGM present.
Adv. Nagendra Dubey for applicant present and filed original Chamber Summons No.1136/19 along with affidavit in support of Chamber Summons. T.O.R.
The case is adjourned to 08.07.2019 for NM and Chamber Summons hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2019

Date: 08-07-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Rizvi for plaintiff present.
Advocate Mr. Siddiqui for defendant no. 1 to 3 present.
Advocate Mr. Giri h/f adv. Ms.Mhatre for defendant/MCGM present.
Adv. Nagendra Dubey h/f adv. V.T.Dubey for applicant present and sought time. Time is granted.
The case is adjourned to 12.07.2019 at  2.45pm  for Chamber Summons hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 12-07-2019

Date: 12-07-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Rizvi for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Ansari h/f adv. Siddiqui for defendants no. 1 to 3 present.
Advocate Mr. Giri h/f adv. Ms.Mhatre for defendant/MCGM present.
Adv. Nagendra Dubey h/f adv. V.T.Dubey for applicant present and submitted written notes on Chamber Summons. TOR and marked as Exh. 9.
Heard advocate for plaintiff.
The case is adjourned to 18.07.2019   for  Chamber Summons order.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2019

Date: 18-07-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Rizvi for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Ansari h/f adv. Siddiqui for defendants no. 1 to 3 present.
Advocate Ms.Mhatre for defendant/ MCGM present.
Adv. Ms. Shruti Vaidya h/f adv. V.T.Dubey for applicant present and filed application for tendering list of documents. TOR and marked as Exh.10
O- Otherside to say.
KB
LO at 5.40 pm,
Advocate Mr. Rizvi for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Punam Tiwari h/f adv. Siddiqui for defendants no. 1 to 3 present.
Advocate Ms.Mhatre for defendant/ MCGM present.
Adv. Ms. Shruti Vaidya h/f adv. V.T.Dubey for applicant present.
Reply filed by advocate for plaintiff overleaf Exh.10.
Heard on application Exh. 10.
The case is adjourned to 23.07.2019 for order.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2019

Date: 23-07-2019
Business: Court is on leave. Hence today board is discharged.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-08-2019

Date: 01-08-2019
Business: Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present. Advocate Ms. Punam Tiwari h/f adv. Siddiqui for defendants no. 1 to 3 present. Advocate Ms.Mhatre for defendant/ MCGM present. The case is adjourned to 05.08.2019 for order on Exh.10.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2019

Date: 05-08-2019
Business: None for plaintiff. Advocate Ms. Punam Tiwari h/f adv. Siddiqui for defendants no. 1 to 3 present. Advocate Ms.Mhatre for defendant/MCGM present. Order on Application Exh. 10 Perused. Heard. The applicants have filed this application to submit on record certain documents in support of Chamber Summons. The application is opposed on the ground that the documents are sought to be tendered on the date on which the order on Chamber Summons is to be passed. Application is also objected on the ground that the other applicants have not signed vakalatnama in favour of the advocate for applicant. Though the Chamber Summons is fixed for orders, in the interest of justice the applicants can be allowed to tender the documents in support of the Chamber Summons. No prejudice will be caused to the plaintiff since the opportunity of further arguments is available to the plaintiff. Hence, the order. ORDER Application Exh. 10 is allowed. List of documents tendered by applicants is TOR and marked as Exh. 11. The case is adjourned to 06.08.2019 for NM/Chamber Summons hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2019

Date: 06-08-2019
Business: Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present. Advocate Ms. Punam Tiwari h/f adv. Siddiqui for defendants no. 1 to 3 present. Advocate Ms. Mhatre for defendant no.4/MCGM present. None for applicants. The case is adjourned to 07.08.2019 for Chamber Summons order.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2019

Date: 07-08-2019
Business: Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present. Adv. Ms. Ansari defendant no. 1 to 3 present. Advocate Mr. Giri for defendant/MCGM present. As Court is busy in hearing urgent ad-interim matter in Suit no.2184/19, Suit no. 2219/19 and dictating orders in ST 7834/19, in suit no. 469/14, 1086/15 also busy in other matters on board the case is adjourned. The case is adjourned to 16.08.2019 for Chamber Summons order.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-08-2019

Date: 16-08-2019
Business: Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present. Adv. Ms. Ansari defendant no. 1 to 3 present. Advocate Ms. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM present. Adv. V.T.Dubey for applicant present. F.R.S.R. following order is passed in Chamber Summons 1136/19 - ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No. 1136/19 is allowed only in terms of prayer clause (a) and only to the extent of applicant no. 6. 2. Plaintiff to amend the title accordingly. 3. Plaintiff shall carry out the amendment within a week and shall serve the newly added defendant at the earliest. Newly added defendant shall file Written Statement within 30 days thereafter. 4. Costs in cause. The case is adjourned to 09.09.2019 for compliance.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2019

Date: 09-09-2019
Business: Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present and requested for extension of time to carry out amendment.
Time is granted till the next date.
Adv. Ms. Roshan Ansari defendant no. 1 to 3 present
Advocate Ms. Chavan  for defendant/MCGM present.
The case is adjourned to 01.10.2019 for compliance.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2019

Date: 01-10-2019
Business: Advocate Rizvi for plaintiff present and sought extension of time to carry out the amendment on the ground that plaintiff is not feeling well. Considering reason time is granted.
Advocate Ms. Mhatre  for defendant/MCGM present.
Advocate Ms. Punam Tiwari for defendants 1 to 3 present.
The case is adjourned to 15.11.2019 for compliance.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2019

Date: 15-11-2019
Business: Adv.Mr.Rizavi for Plaintiff, submits that amendment is carried out, prayed for time to serve summons on defendant no.6.
Adv. Mr. Giri for deft no.4/MCGM present.
Adv. Ms.Tamnna Khan for deft nos. 1 to 3 present.
Matter is adjd.for  on 13.01.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2020

Date: 13-01-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. Rizavi for Plaintiff, prayed for adjd to file affidavit in respect of service of summons to deft nos.5 and 6.
Adv. Mr. Tondawalkar for deft.no.4/MCGM present, prayed for adjd to file reply.
Adv. Mr. Siddhiqi for deft nos. 1 to 3 present.
Plff to clarify that whether summons is served on deft nos. 5 and 6.
Matter is adjd.for reply and compliance on 09.03.2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 09-03-2020

Date: 09-03-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. Rizvi for plaintiff, submits that deft no.6 is added in view of order dtd. 16.08.19 as per order in ch/s no. 1136/19, therefore, deft nos. 6 knows about present suit.  Therefore, there is no necessity to fresh summons to deft no.6.  However, plff is ready to handover copy of Exh.1 and relevant documents to deft no.6.
Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for deft./MCGM, prayed for adjd to file reply.
There is substance in submission of ld adv for plff.  There is no necessity to issue fresh summons to deft no.6.
Plff to submit service affidavit about deft no.5.
None for deft no.6.
Matter is adjd. for reply on NM 27.04.2020.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2020

Date: 27-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 18-05-2020

Date: 18-05-2020
Business: National Lockdown.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2020

Date: 05-06-2020
Business: National Lockdown
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2020

Date: 23-06-2020
Business: Adjd. to
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2020

Date: 20-08-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2020

Date: 01-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2020

Date: 04-12-2020
Business: None for Plaintiff present.
None for defts.1 to 3 and 6.
Adv. Tondwalkar for deft.no.4/MCGM present.
Matter is adjd. to 22.03.2021 for n/m reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 22-03-2021

Date: 22-03-2021
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2021

Date: 21-06-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 30-08-2021

Date: 30-08-2021
Business: Court is Vacant. Matter adj. to next date.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2021

Date: 18-10-2021
Business: CORAM-H.H.J. SHRI. S.D. KULKARNI (C.R.No.08)
(Matter pertains to C.R. No.11)
As per Office order No.213/2021 dated 12.10.2021, Holiday declared on 18.10.2021.
Earlier order if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd.  To 27.11.2021
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2021

Date: 27-11-2021
Business: Court is Vacant. Matter is adj. to next date.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2022

Date: 21-01-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant No.4/MCGM is present.
Rest of the defendants are absent.
In view of office order no. 07/2022 dated 07.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dated 06.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases (all variants) and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned without passing any adverse order against the party/s.
Adjourned for NM reply to 23.03.2022.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2022

Date: 23-03-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Rizavi  for plaintiff is present and requested for hearing on NM.
Adv. Ms. Afrin Khan for defendant No. 1 is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant No.4/MCGM is present.
Rest of the defendants are absent.
Court is busy in other matter of incharge Court and hearing old NM No. 1501/10 and NM No. 1502/10.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 18.07.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2022

Date: 18-07-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Ms. Afrin Khan for defendant No. 1 is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant No. 4/MCGM is present.
Rest of the defendants are absent.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 16.09.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2022

Date: 16-09-2022
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Afrin Khan for defendant No.1 is present.
Adv. Khandagale for defendant No.4/MCGM is present.
Rest of the defendants are absent.
The plaintiff is absent to proceed with NM No. 4843/2018. Hence, it is posted for dismissal Order.
Adjourned for NM dismissal Order/NM hearing to 05.11.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 05-11-2022

Date: 05-11-2022
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Ms. Afrin Khan for defendant Nos. 1 and 2 is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant No. 4/MCGM is present.
Rest of the defendants are absent.
KB LO at 05:15 pm.
Order below exhibit No. 01:
      Even today, the plaintiff is absent to proceed with the suit and NM, although directed specifically. He is also absent to submit service affidavit of defendant No. 5, as directed as per roznama dtd. 09.03.2020. In the result, it is clear that he is not interested to proceed with the NM. In the result, his NM No. 4843/2018 stands dismissed in default.
Adjourned for filing service affidavit/NM reply to 11.01.2023.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 11-01-2023

Date: 11-01-2023
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. S.C. Khandagale for defendant No. 4/MCGM is present.
Rest of the defendants are absent. It seems that the plaintiff already replied NM No. 741/2019. Hence, it is posted for hearing.
Adjourned for filing affidavit of service/NM hearing to 01.03.2023.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 01-03-2023

Date: 01-03-2023
Business: As the court is on leave matter adjd to
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2023

Date: 28-04-2023
Business: Even today, none present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. G.O. Giri for defendant/MCGM is present.
Adjourned for NM dismissal to 07.07.2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 07-07-2023

Date: 07-07-2023
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. G.O. Giri for defendant No. 4/MCGM is present.
Rest of the defendants are absent.
Adjourned for NM dismissal to 19-08-2023.
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2023

Date: 19-08-2023
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
None present for defendant Nos. 1 to 3 to proceed with NM
No. 741/2019. Hence, NM 741/2019 stands dismissed in default.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale h/f Adv. Mr. Giri for defendant No.4/MCGM is present.
Adjourned for WS to 11.10.2023.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 19-08-2023

Main Case No: SUIT/0103237/2018
Main Cnr: MHCC010152342018
Main Filing No: 111447

Filing Number: 102181/2019
Filing Date: 21-02-2019
First Hearing Date: 21st February 2019
Decision Date: 19th August 2023
Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 11  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE