Skip to main content
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT

Swati Sahebrao GadgeVsSuryakant Ramchandra Baraskar

CNR MHCC01001893201828-COURT 28 AD-HOC JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--PARTLY DECREED
Decision Date: 03rd May 2019

TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100395/2018
Registration Date
02 Apr 2018

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-06-2018
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present.
    None for Defendant.
    Matter is adjd. to 04/08/2018 for Report.
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2018
    
    Date: 04-08-2018
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present.
    None for Defendant.
    Matter is adjd. to 25/11/2018 for Service Affidavit.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2018
    
    Date: 25-11-2018
    Business: W.O.B.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 26-11-2018
    
    Date: 26-11-2018
    Business: None for Plaintiff.
    None for Defendant.
    Matter is adjd. to 09/01/2019 for Service report.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2019
    
    Date: 09-01-2019
    Business: Adv. Patil h/f Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present.
    None for Defendant.
    Plaint.
    V.P.
    List of documents.
    Memorandum of address.
    Advocate for plaintiff has filed.
    Service affidavit.
    Non appearance certificate.
    Evidence affidavit
    List of document.
    Matter is adjd. to 11/02/2019 for Exparte Argument.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 11-02-2019
    
    Date: 11-02-2019
    Business: Adv. for Plaintiff absent.
    None for Defendant
    Matter is adjd. to 11/03/2019 for Exparte argument.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2019
    
    Date: 11-03-2019
    Business: None for Plaintiff.
    None for Defendant.
    Matter is adjd. to 12/04/2019 for Exparte argument.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 12-04-2019
    
    Date: 12-04-2019
    Business: Adv for plaintiff Mr.Ramesh Jain present
    Heard Argument of Adv for plaintiff
    Matter is Adjd for Further Exparte Argument to
    03/05/2019
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENT P.H.
    Next Hearing Date: 03-05-2019
    
    Date: 03-05-2019
    Business: Suit is partly decreed with cost.
    Nature Of Disposal: PARTLY DECREED
    Disposal Date: 03-05-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101992/2018
    Filing Date: 03-02-2018
    First Hearing Date: 25th June 2018
    Decision Date: 03rd May 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 AD-HOC JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1Full order available
    03 May 2019

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: :1: Summary Suit No.395/2018 Received on : 03.02.2018 Registered on : 02.04.2018 Decided on : 03.05.2019 Duration : Y M D 01 02 29 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 395 OF 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010018932018 Swati Sahebrao Gadge of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant having her address at Room No.11, Stany Chawl, Wadia Estate, Kurla (West), Mumbai – 400 070. ...Plaintiff Versus Suryakant Ramchandra Baraskar age not known…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    03 May 2019

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: :1: Summary Suit No.395/2018 Received on : 03.02.2018 Registered on : 02.04.2018 Decided on : 03.05.2019 Duration : Y M D 01 02 29 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 395 OF 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010018932018 Swati Sahebrao Gadge of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant having her address at Room No.11, Stany Chawl, Wadia Estate, Kurla (West), Mumbai – 400 070. ...Plaintiff Versus Suryakant Ramchandra Baraskar age not known…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.