Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 01 Apr 2019 · CNR MHCC010018912018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: :1: Summary Suit No.889/2018 Received on : 03.02.2018 Registered on : 28.08.2018 Decided on : 01.04.2019 Duration : Y M D 01 02 01 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 889 OF 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010018912018 Jyoti Datta Wagh Age : 29 years, of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant having her address at 1/11, Ram Niwas Chawl Sunder Baug, Kurla (West), Mumbai – 400 070. ...Plaintiff Versus Giridhar Uga Rathod Age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant working for gain with B.M.C., Concervancy Dept., “L” Ward. S.G. Barve Road Kurla, West, Mumbai – 400 070, Employee No.3636527. Paysheet No.A6029. And residing at Plot No.2, Vadvali, Gav Acharya Wadi, Chembur, Mumbai – 400 074. ...Defendant. Appearances: Advocate Mr. Ramesh Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendant Exparte. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE S.P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 1st APRIL, 2019. -- 1 of 6 -- :2: Summary Suit No.889/2018 [ J U D G M E N T ] Allegations of plaintiff in short is as under : 1. Plaintiff has stated that on 11th June 2016 the defendant executed a Demand Promissory Note in her favour for valuable consideration being a sum of Rs.4,00,000/ received by the defendant from her against and on the basis of execution and handing over of the said Demand Promissory Note. By the said Demand Promissory Note the Defendant promised to pay to her the said sum of Rs.4,00,000/ alongwith interest thereon @ 18% per annum on Demand. Plaintiff has further stated that she from time to time demanded from the defendant the said amount of Rs.4,00,000/ and interest accrued thereon @ 18% per annum. But the defendant, however, failed and neglected to pay the said sum and any part thereof and kept her on false and baseless promises. Plaintiff has further stated that after waiting sufficient time, she forwarded her Advocate's letter dated 12th April, 2017 recording the above facts, and instructed the Defendant to comply with the requisitions mentioned in the said letter, within a period of 48 hours from receipt thereof. Plaintiff has further stated that in the premises aforesaid, there is now due and payable by the defendant to her a sum of Rs.4,72,197.26ps. in accordance with the Particulars of Claim. Therefore, plaintiff filed the present suit. 2. Defendant failed to appear in the suit, therefore, suit has proceeded exparte against defendant. 3. Heard the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. 4. Following points arise for determination and their findings followed by reasons are as stated below. -- 2 of 6 -- :3: Summary Suit No.889/2018 Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to get amount of Rs.4,72,197.26ps from defendant along with interest @ 18% p. a. on the principal sum of Rs.4,00,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation ? ...Partly in the affirmative. 2. What order and Decree ? ...As per final order REASONS 5. Plaintiff has filed evidence of herself in the form of affidavit below Exh.7. Plaintiff relied upon the following documents as documentary evidence which are as under : Sr. No. Exhibits Particulars 1. Exh.9 Promissory Note dated 11th July 2016 2. Exh.10 Plaintiff's Advocates' letter dated 12th April 2017 alongwith the postal records in connection with the transmission and delivery thereof. 3. Exh.11 Money Lender Licence. 4. Exh.12 Forms under Bombay Money Lending Act. 5. Exh.13 Books of Accounts. AS TO POINT NOS. 1 AND 2: 6. Plaintiff has filed evidence of herself in the form of affidavit below Exh.7 and stated that on 11th July 2016 the defendant executed a Demand Promissory Note of Rs.4,00,000/ in her favour for valuable consideration sum of Rs.4,00,000/ received by the defendant. Plaintiff has further stated that by the said Demand Promissory Note the defendant promised to pay to her that the said sum of Rs.4,00,000/ alongwith interest thereon @ 18% per annum on demand. Plaintiff has further stated that she from time to time demanded from the defendant -- 3 of 6 -- :4: Summary Suit No.889/2018 the said amount of Rs.4,00,000/ and interest accrued thereon @ 18% per annum. But the defendant, however, failed and neglected to pay the said sum and any part thereof and kept her on false and baseless promises. Plaintiff has further stated that on 12th April 2017 she forwarded a Demand Notice through her Advocates to the defendant. The said Demand Notice was duly served upon the defendant. Plaintiff has further stated that defendant have not disputed the contents of the said Notice and not forwarded any reply thereto. Plaintiff has further stated that in the above circumstances she filed the present suit for Rs.4,72,197.26ps. and further interest on Rs.4,00,000/ at the rate of 18% per annum from filing of suit till payment and costs. 7. Plaintiff has adduced original Promissory Note, Plaintiff's Advocate letter alongwith the postal records, Money Lender Licence, Forms under Bombay Money Lending Act and copy of Books of Accounts on record as documentary evidence. The oral evidence of plaintiff is corroborated by documentary evidence. Defendant has failed to challenge all the allegations in the plaint and evidence of plaintiff. Due to all these circumstances, plaintiff has proved that she is entitled to get sum of Rs.4,72,197.26 ps. from defendant. 8. It appears that as per Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it will be proper to direct defendant to give interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.4,00,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. Hence, answer point No.1 partly in the affirmative and pass following Order: ORDER 1. Suit is partly decreed with cost. 2. Defendant is directed to pay amount of Rs.4,72,197.26 ps. to -- 4 of 6 -- :5: Summary Suit No.889/2018 plaintiff along with interest @ 9% p.a. on the on the same amount of Rs. 4,00,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee be refunded as per rules. (S.P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 01.04.2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 01.04.2019 Transcribed on : 01.04.2019 Signed on : 01.04.2019 -- 5 of 6 -- :6: Summary Suit No.889/2018 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 24.04.2019 At 4:25 p.m. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Ms. S.P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 01.04.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 01.04.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 24.04.2019 -- 6 of 6 --
