Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Naresh Hariram Choithani - Suit St. No.1112 of 2019VsMCGM

CNR MHCC0100179320194-COURT 04 AD-HOC JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 18th July 2024

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100696/2019
Registration Date
18 Feb 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-02-2019
    Business: Adv Dalal for plff present.
    Adv Mrs.Bhoir for BMC/deft. present.
    Adv for deft filed for taking List of documents on record. It is TOR.
    Ld adv for plff. takes strong objection to take the documents on record on the ground that the copies are not legible - Order - Production allowed.
    The deft is directed to furnish legible copies to the plff.
    Liberty is granted to file say on the documents.
    Adv for plff tendered original NM No.696/19 along with affidavit. It is TOR.
    Adv for plff also tendered original ch/sum no.350/19 along with affidavit. It is TOR.
    Adjd to 20/02/2019 for ch/sum no.350/19 order.
    Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 20-02-2019
    
    Date: 20-02-2019
    Business: Adv Dalal for plff present.
    Adv Mrs.Bhoir for BMC/deft. present.
    K.B..
    Later on..
    Adv Dalal for plff present.
    Adv Mrs.Bhoir for BMC/deft. present.
    FRSR. The following order is passed.
    Order on Ch/sum No.350 of 2019 -
    1. Chamber summons No.350 of 2019 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
    
     2. The plaintiff is directed to carry out amendment accordingly on or before next date.
    Adjd to 26/02/2019 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2019
    
    Date: 26-02-2019
    Business: Adv Dalal for plff present.
    Adv Mhatre for MCGM/deft. Present.
    Plff is directed to register the suit and office shall allow him to comply objections if any.
    Adjd to 5/03/2019 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2019
    
    Date: 05-03-2019
    Business: Plff and Adv. absent.
    Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for MCGM/Deft. Present.
    On oral request of Advocate for Defendant, adjournment granted.
    Plff is directed to register the suit on or before next date.
    Adjd to 12/4/2019 for reply on N/M.
    LO at 3.00 p.m.
    Adv. Mr. Dalal for Plff present.
    Adjd to 7/3/2019 for reply on N/M.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 07-03-2019
    
    Date: 07-03-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Dalal for Plff present.
    Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for MCGM/deft. present and filed reply to N/M.  t.o.r.
    Copy is received by other side.
    Adjd to 12/3/2019 for N/M hearing/rejoinder.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2019
    
    Date: 12-03-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Dalal for Plff present and tendered rejoinder in N/M No.696/19.  t.o.r.
    Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for MCGM/deft. present.
    Copy of rejoinder is served to otherside.
    Adjd to 16/3/2019 for N/M hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 14-03-2019
    
    Date: 14-03-2019
    Business: (By preceipe).
    Adv. Mr. D.A. Thoart for the Plff present.
    Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for MCGM/Deft present.
    Order on ad-interim relief on N/M No.696/19
    Perused contents of N/M, plaint, documents annexed thereto, documents filed by Deft and heard arguments advanced by both sides.  It is prayed in this motion that the Deft/MCGM be directed to reconstruct a room admeasuring 160 sq.ft. Carpet area of the suit premises (demolished on 4/2/19) or permitting Plff to reconstruct the same with prayer of injunction restraining the Deft/MCGM from further demolishing suit premises viz Block No.32, Room No.1.
    It is pertinent to note that on the day of filing of the suit i.e. 30/1/2019 ad-interim relief was sought by the Plff and the same was refused.  It was observed that two structures 32/1(A) and 32/1 were separately assessed showing that they were two different structures. The Plff got amended the suit by filing Ch/s claiming that there was no block No.32, Room No.1 (A) in existence. In other-wards the Plff is coming with a case that the Deft/MCGM is demolishing Room No.32/1 illegally even when there are voluminous documents showing existence of suit premises since prior to 1955.
    Ld. Adv. for the Plff has tried to suggest that the Deft/MCGM through its advocate made statement on 6/2/2019 that notice structure was demolished on 4/2/2019 and subsequently issued notice u/s.488 of MMC Act for demolishen of the same structure.  Ld. Adv. for Deft has clarified that one room was demolished on 4/2/2019 and two rooms were found locked therefore they were not demolished and notice u/s488 of MMC Act was precisely issued to demolish those two rooms.
    Ld. Adv. for Plff has taken me through documents annexed with the plaint.  As stated herein earlier once ad-interim relief was refused on 30/1/2019, the Plff had remedy to prefer appeal against order.  No new documents have been filed by the Plff to show that room No.32/1(A) is not in existence. As such any observation contrary to the order dt.30/1/2019 will be review of the order which is permissible only under exceptional circumstances.  Therefore no new ground is shown by the Plff to grant ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).  Therefore ad-interim relief is rejected.
    Ld. Adv. for Plff requests to continue order dt.13/3/2019 for a period of four weeks so that he can prefer appeal against the order. Ld. Adv. for Deft strongly objects this prayer. As discussed herein earlier, the Plff has failed to make out prima-facie case and therefore ad-interim relief is rejected.  As such he is not entitled for extension of order dt.13/3/2019.  Therefore the prayer is rejected.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2019
    
    Date: 18-04-2019
    Business: Adv. Tiwari h/f Adv. S. R. Dubey for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mhatre for deft./MCGM present.
    On oral request of Ld. Advocate for plaintiff, adjournment
    granted.
    Matter is adjd. to 23/07/2019 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2019
    
    Date: 23-07-2019
    Business: Court is on leave. Hence, Board is discharged.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2019
    
    Date: 05-09-2019
    Business: As Court is on leave today, board is discharged. Matter is adjd. to 05-10-2019 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2019
    
    Date: 05-10-2019
    Business: As Court is on half day afternoon session leave.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 21-11-2019
    
    Date: 21-11-2019
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mrs. Hajare for MCGM/Deft. present.
    On oral request of advocate for Defendant, adjournment granted.
    Adjd to 25.02.2020 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2020
    
    Date: 25-02-2020
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mrs. Hajare for MCGM/Deft. present.
     Matter adjd to 28.04.2020 for NM hrg.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2020
    
    Date: 28-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 19-05-2020
    
    Date: 19-05-2020
    Business: In view of extension of Lockdown period pursuant to the declaration of Novel Corona Virus (Covid-19) as global pandemic by WHO and as per Office Order 78 of 2020, matter adjourned
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2020
    
    Date: 06-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2020
    
    Date: 24-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2020
    
    Date: 23-09-2020
    Business: As per direction of Hon\\\''ble High Court , due to heavy rain, holiday is
    declared on 23.09.2020 and matter is adjd to
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 02-12-2020
    
    Date: 02-12-2020
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Khandagale h/f Adv. Ms. Hazare for deft/MCGM present.
    Matter adjd to 26/02/2021 for NM Hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2021
    
    Date: 26-02-2021
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Ms. Hajare for deft/MCGM present.
    Matter adjd to 27/04/2021 for NM Hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2021
    
    Date: 27-04-2021
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 15-07-2021
    
    Date: 15-07-2021
    Business: Due to Covid-19.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2021
    
    Date: 07-09-2021
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv Smita Chavan for defendant / MCGM present.
    Adjd. To 27/10/2021 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2021
    
    Date: 27-10-2021
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar h/f. Adv. Mrs. Chavan for Defendant/MCGM is present.
    Matter is adjd to 04/12/2021 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2021
    
    Date: 04-12-2021
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Chavan for Defendant/MCGM present.
    Matter is adjd to 29/03/2022 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 29-03-2022
    
    Date: 29-03-2022
    Business: Adv. Sushil Sharma for plaintiff present and requests for time to argue on NM. Time is granted till next date
    Adv Mrs Smita Chavan for defendant / MCGM present.
    Adjd. To 16/06/2022 for Nm hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2022
    
    Date: 16-06-2022
    Business: H.H.J. is on leave today.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2022
    
    Date: 26-07-2022
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 30-08-2022
    
    Date: 30-08-2022
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 20-10-2022
    
    Date: 20-10-2022
    Business: As Court is on leave today, board is discharged and matter is adjourned.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 20-12-2022
    
    Date: 20-12-2022
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 23-02-2023
    
    Date: 23-02-2023
    Business: Adv. Dalal for plaintiff present and requested time to argue on N/M. Time is granted till next date.
    Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for defendant/ BMC is present.
    Adjd. to 13/06/2023 for N/M hrg.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2023
    
    Date: 13-06-2023
    Business: Court is on leave
    matter adjourned.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2023
    
    Date: 10-08-2023
    Business: Advocate  Sushil Sharma or plaintiff present and seeks time to argue NM. Hence, matter adjourned.
    Advocate Mhatre for defendant/BMC present.
    Adjd to 05.10.2023  for NM Hearing
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2023
    
    Date: 05-10-2023
    Business: Advocate Dalal undertake to file VP on next date on behalf of plaintiff. Hence matter adjourned.
    Advocate Mhatre for defendant/BMC present.
    Adjd  to  07.11.2023   for  NM Hearing
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2023
    
    Date: 07-11-2023
    Business: Advocate Sushil Sharma  for plaintiff present and tendered Vakalatnama marked as  Exh. 4
    Advocate Mhatre for defendant/BMC present and submitted that plaintiff is delaying the matter and there is injunction order in favour of plaintiff. However considering the change in Adv. time is granted.
    Adjd  to  05.12.2023   for NM Hearing
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2023
    
    Date: 05-12-2023
    Business: Advocate Sushil Sharma h/f Dube for plaintiff present and tendered draft Notice of Motion @ affidavit in support.
    O- Leave granted to register NM. Copy is supplied to other side and seeks time to argue NM No. 696/2019
    Advocate Mhatre for defendant/BMC present and opposed adjournment stating that there is injunction order. The suit is of year 2019. However change in Advocate, time is granted as one more last chance.
    Adjd  to 19.12.2023  for Reply to Draft NM and Hearing on NM No. 696/2019
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2023
    
    Date: 19-12-2023
    Business: Advocate R.D. Thorat for plaintiff present and submitted that Sr. Adv. Thorat is going to argue the NM but he is not available today. Adv for deft/BMC opposed adjournment. Hence matter adjourned as a last chance .
    Advocate Mhatre for defendant/BMC present and seeks time to file reply to NM No. 4811/2023.
    Plaintiff is directed to tender NM No. 4811/2023 on next date.
    Adjd  to 25.01.2024    for  reply to Draft NM and NM Hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2024
    
    Date: 25-01-2024
    Business: Advocate Jitendra Patel  h/f Shushil Sharma   for plaintiff present and tendered NM No. 4811/2023 and submitted that D.A. Thorat was present in the morning but he is not feeling well. Hence left the Court. Adv for deft/BMC opposed adjournment stating that status quo order from Hon’ble Bombay High Court. However considering the reason matter adjourned as a one more last chance.
    Advocate Mhatre for defendant/BMC present and seeks time to file reply to NM No. 4811/2023. Time is granted.
    Adjd  to  22.02.2024   for NM Hearing and reply by BMC on NM No. 4811/23
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2024
    
    Date: 22-02-2024
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Advocate Jyoti Patil-Mhatre for defendant/BMC present and submitted that plaintiff is not present and kept for dismissal of NM.
    None present for plaintiff. Hence matter adjourned and kept for dismissal of NM No. 696/19 and reply to NM No. 4811/23.
    Adjd  to  16.03.2024   for Dismissal of NM No. 696/19 and Hearing on NM No. 4811/23
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2024
    
    Date: 16-03-2024
    Business: Advocate Pradhuman Chauhan h/f Sushil Sharma for plaintiff present and submitted that uncle of Sr. Adv Sharma  was expired and he is not unable to remain present for  giving instruction.
    Advocate Jyoti Patil- Mhatre for defendant/BMC present and opposed adjournment stating that there is ad-interim protection and plaintiff is prolonging the hearing. The roznama shows that 05.12.2023,  19.12.2023, 25.01.2024 last chance was granted. However considering the reason matter is adjourned as a last chance.
    Adjd  to 18.04.2024  for NM Hearing
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2024
    
    Date: 18-04-2024
    Business: Court is on leave
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2024
    
    Date: 13-06-2024
    Business: Advocate Dalal h/f Sushil Sharma for plaintiff present.
    Advocate Waghmare for defendant/BMC present and seeks time to file reply to NM 4811/2023. Hence time is granted as a one more last chance as a NM is of year 2019 as it is pending since last many days.
    Adjd  to 18.07.2024  for hearing on NM No. 696/19 and reply to NM No. 4811/23
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2024
    
    Date: 18-07-2024
    Business: Plaintiff present
    Adv.  Sushil Sharma for plaintiff present and tendered application for withdrawal of suit marked as Exh. 5
    Advocate Waghmare for defendant/BMC present and has given say on Exh. 5  overleaf.
    Order below Exh. 1
         The plaintiff has filed an application below Exh. 5   for permission to withdraw the suit unconditionally. An application is signed by the plaintiff and he is identified by his Advocate Sushil Sharma.  Plaintiff and his adv submitted that notice structure has been demolished and plaintiff do not want to proceed with the suit. Hence suit be disposed as withdrawn unconditionally.  Deft/BMC submitted to pass necessary order.  Hence I pass following order.
    ORDER
    1 Suit is disposed of as withdrawn as per application below Exh. 5
    2.  In the view of disposal of suit NM No. 696/2019 NM No. 4811/2023 are disposed of accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 18-07-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101919/2019
    Filing Date: 18-02-2019
    First Hearing Date: 18th February 2019
    Decision Date: 18th July 2024
    Court Number And Judge: 4-COURT 04 AD-HOC JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    18 Jul 2024
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 55 Dt:18.07.2024
    SU 598/19
    Exh. 5
    CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI S.H. SALUNKHE ( C.R. No. 04 )
    Plaintiff present
    Adv. Sushil Sharma for plaintiff present and tendered
    application for withdrawal of suit marked as Exh. 5
    Advocate Waghmare for defendant/BMC present and has
    given say on Exh. 5 overleaf.
    Order below Exh. 1
    The plaintiff has filed an application below Exh. 5 for
    permission to withdraw the suit unconditionally. An
    application is signed by the plaintiff and he is identified by
    his Advocate Sushil Sharma. Plaintiff and his adv
    submitted that notice structure has been demolished and
    plaintiff do not want to proceed with the suit. Hence suit be
    disposed as withdrawn unconditionally. Deft/BMC
    submitted to pass necessary order. Hence I pass following
    order.
    ORDER
    1 Suit is disposed of as withdrawn as per application below
    Exh. 5
    2. In the view of disposal of suit NM No. 696/2019 NM
    No. 4811/2023 are disposed of accordingly.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.