Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Vinod R. Shah (Deleted) Bhavna Vinod Shah and Ors.VsDinesh P. Mehta

CNR MHCC010016902019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 08th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100049/2019
Registration Date
14 Feb 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 28-02-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for plaintiff present. As today is the first date in the matter, on request of Shri. Yadav, for taking further steps, adjourned to 12/03/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2019
    
    Date: 12-03-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Yadav prays for issue of warrant of attachment u/o.XXI Rule 54 of CPC, without issue of notice stating that the exe.apaplication has been filed within two years of passing decree. He further states that the properties sought to be attached belongs to the defendant and are free from all the encumbrances. Hence, issue warrant as prayed for returnable on 12/06/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2019
    
    Date: 12-06-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Defendant present. Exe. Application marked as Exh.A (Colly).  Shri. Yadav  has tendered the original warrant u/o.XXI Rule 54 of CPC, alongwith execution report endorsed thereon and also annexing therewith Sheriff Report Bearing No. VNT/A-73849/844/2019, dt 11/06/2019,  taken on record and marked as Exh.B (Colly). Shri. Defendant states that, he intends to take appropriate steps in the matter and in view of this, defendant is at liberty to take appropriate steps and certified copies if applied by the defendant are expedited. Shri. Yadav, seeks time to take further steps and on his request, adjd to 01/07/2019. Later on Shri. Dinesh Jain, third party appeared and he is informed about the next date.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2019
    
    Date: 01-07-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 26/07/2019. Sheriff report bearing no.VNT/A-73849/844/2019,dt.11/06/2019, under this office inward no. 6298 dt.13/06/2019, taken on record and marked as Exh.C.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2019
    
    Date: 26-07-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Defendant present. Shri. Yadav seeks time to take further steps. Defendant seeks time to file reply.  Hence, by consent, adjd to 05/08/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2019
    
    Date: 05-08-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. On request of Shri. Yadav, for taking further steps, adjd to 14/08/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 14-08-2019
    
    Date: 14-08-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. On request of Shri. Yadav, for taking further steps, adjd to 21/09/2019. Later on Shri. Pankaj Das, advocate for the defendant and Shri. Dinesh Mehta, defendant appeared and they have been informed about the next date.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2019
    
    Date: 21-09-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Shri. Pankaj Das, advocate for the defendant present. Plaintiff and defendant present. As Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 11/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2019
    
    Date: 11-10-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Shri. Pankaj Das, advocate for the defendant present. Shri. Yadav prays for issue of warrant of sale. Shri. Das states that the defendant is intending to file Appeal in the Honourable High Court and seeks time to file reply in the present exe.application. Hence, by consent, adjd to 19/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2019
    
    Date: 19-10-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Shri. Dinesh Mehta, Defendant present. Shri. Yadav prays for issue of warrant of sale. However, Shri. Mehta seeks time to file reply stating that the copy of exe.application has not been served upon him. Shri. Yadav, undertakes to serve the copy upon the defendant within short period. Defendant is also at liberty apply for the certified copies of exe.application. Certified copies, if applied for by the defendant, are expedited. Defendant undertakes to file reply by next date, hence, by consent, adjd to 07/11/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2019
    
    Date: 07-11-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present.
    Shri. Pankaj Das, advocate for the defendant present.
    Shri. Das seeks time to file reply and undertakes to file Vakalatnama by next date, stating that the copy of exe.application has been received today only.
    Hence, by consent, for reply, adjd to 05/12/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2019
    
    Date: 05-12-2019
    Business: Shr. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the plaintiff present.
    Shri. Mohan Devkar, advocate for the defendant present.
    Shri. Devkar seeks three weeks time to file Vakalatnama and reply, stating that the Senior is busy elsewhere and the defendant is also not well.
    Shri. Yadav objects, however, on considering the ground narrated by the Shri. Devkar, fairly consents for short adjournment, by way of last chance to file reply.
    Hence, by consent, adjd to 12/12/2019, for reply of the defendant by way of last chance.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2019
    
    Date: 12-12-2019
    Business: Shri. O.P Yadav, advocate for the plaintiff present.
    As Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 06/01/2020.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2020
    
    Date: 06-01-2020
    Business: Shri.O.P. Yadav, advocate for the plaintiff present.
    None for the defendant.
    Shri. Yadav has tendered affidavit in support of issue of warrant of sale, t.o.r. and marked as Exh-D.
    On request of Shri. Yadav, for orders of the issuance of warrant of sale, adjd to 08/01/2020.
    Later on Shri. Mohan Devkule, advocate for the defendant appeared and he has informed about the todays roznama.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2020
    
    Date: 08-01-2020
    Business: Shri. O.P. Yadav, advocate for the plaintiff present.
    Shri. Yadav prays for issue of warrant of sale, stating that the affidavit in support of the issue of warrant of sale has already been filed on last occasion.
    Hence, upon perusing the affidavit, issue warrant of sale as prayed for, which shall remain alive till completion of the proceedings.
    In view of this, exe.application stands disposed off.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 08-01-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101347/2019
    Filing Date: 14-02-2019
    First Hearing Date: 28th February 2019
    Decision Date: 08th January 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.