Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100426/2018 Mohamed Gulam Roshan Vs 1.Dayaram Dulichand Ahir 2.Nandkishore Dulichand Ahir Date : 21-06-2018 Business : Adv. Ms Indira Jalgaonkar for plaintiff present. None for defendant. Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff in NM No.426/2018. By this notice of motion, the defendants are praying for condonation of delay in filing written statement. There is delay of 120 days. The plaintiff has…
NOTICE OF MOTION
Mohamed Gulam RoshanVsDayaram Dulichand Ahir +1 more
CNR MHCC0100168020183-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 21st June 2018
TrustJury record updated 08 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100426/2018
- Registration Date
- 01 Feb 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
Not available
For Respondent
Parties
3Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 03-03-2018 Business: Heard both sides in NM no.3267/2017. list the matter for Order in NM No.3267/2017 and Reply in NM No.426/2018 to 08.03.2018. Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION Next Hearing Date: 08-03-2018 Date: 08-03-2018 Business: Matter adj. for Order to 09.03.2018. Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION Next Hearing Date: 09-03-2018 Date: 09-03-2018 Business: Matter adj. for Compliance to 21.06.2018. Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2018 Date: 21-06-2018 Business: Adv. Ms Indira Jalgaonkar for plaintiff present. None for defendant. Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff in NM No.426/2018. By this notice of motion, the defendants are praying for condonation of delay in filing written statement. There is delay of 120 days. The plaintiff has not filed reply. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that she leaves it to the court. Perused the affidavit filed in support of notice of motion. It appears that defendants are senior citizens and they are suffering from various diseases. Therefore they could not contact their advocate. The averments made in the affidavit are un-controverted. There is no reason to disbelieve the cause for delay given in the affidavit. However, the plaintiff is entitled to cost from the defendants. Hence notice of motion no. 426/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of cost of Rs.2000/- to the plaintiff by next date. If the cost is paid, the written statement be taken on record. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 21-06-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 101871/2018 Filing Date: 01-02-2018 First Hearing Date: 03rd March 2018 Decision Date: 21st June 2018 Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 1Full order available
21 Jun 2018
Order 1Full order available
21 Jun 2018
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100426/2018 Mohamed Gulam Roshan Vs 1.Dayaram Dulichand Ahir 2.Nandkishore Dulichand Ahir Date : 21-06-2018 Business : Adv. Ms Indira Jalgaonkar for plaintiff present. None for defendant. Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff in NM No.426/2018. By this notice of motion, the defendants are praying for condonation of delay in filing written statement. There is delay of 120 days. The plaintiff has…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
