Order 1

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: CS No. 100759/ 2021 Felcy – Rockford Exh.12 1 / 3
Further Examination in chief of plaintiff witness Shelton
Coutinho on oath by Adv. Dipesh Palvankar, for plaintiff.
Defendant side called, but absent.
1) Affidavit now shown to me bears my signature. Its
contents are true and correct. It is already marked as Exh.12.
2) Through List of Documents at Exh.13, I have filed
following documents :
Exh.15 : Original PAAA document dt. 20.12.2013 shown to
me is the same. It was executed between me, my
mother Felcy Coutinho and defendant Rockford
Structures through director Mr. Jitendra Shah. It
bears my signature and signatures of my mother and
director Mr. Shah. My mother and Mr. Shah signed
it before me. We all three also put our thumb
impressions on the said agreement at page 17.
Contents therein are true and correct. It also bears
signature of two witnesses. Thereafter the said
agreement was present before Sub-Registrar,
Mumbai 1 for registration through myself and Mr.
Malayanch Shirishbhai Batavia as a power of
attorney holder Mr. Jitendra Shah. It is marked as
Exh.15.
Exh.16 : Original cheque dt. 03.10.2014 drawn by defendant
to the plaintif for sum of Rs.1,90,000/-. It is marked
as Exh.16.
Article.A : Photocopy of Central Bank of India statement dt.
28.10.2014. It is marked as Article A.
Article.B : Copy of electricity bill for 18.12.2024. It is marked
as Article B.
Article.C Photocopy of reminder notice dt. 19.10.2015. It is
marked as Article C.
Article.D Copy of legal notice dt. 08.08.2016. It is marked as
Article D.
-- 1 of 3 --
CS No. 100759/ 2021 Felcy – Rockford Exh.12 2 / 3
Article.E Photocopy of Order dt. 15.10.2018. It is marked as
Article E.
Exh.17 Office copy of application filed under RTI to State
Public Information Officer with acknowledgment
and information received from Information Officer
(in all 3 letters) through RTI in response to my RTI
application. Office copy bears my signature.
Contents therein are true and correct. Office copy of
application alongwith 3 letter collectively marked as
Exh.17.
Court observation : It is made clear to both parties that,
documents are marked as Exhibit (in accordance with contents
from evidence affidavit) for identification purpose.
Both sides are at liberty to prove and disprove the contents of the
documents, in accordance with various provisions, pertaining to
Commercial Courts Act, Code of Civil Procedure, Indian
Evidence Act and Information Technology Act.
Further examination in chief is over :
Defendant side called, but absent.
In the interest of justice Suit adjourned for cross-examination.
ROAC
Mumbai
Dated : 05.02.2025
(S. B. Bhansali)
Additional District Judge,
Court Room No.31 - Commercial Court,
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai
-- 2 of 3 --
CS No. 100759/ 2021 Felcy – Rockford Exh.12 3 / 3
Date 02-04-2025
Cross examination PW-01 resumed on S.A. Shelton Coutinho.
In presence of advocate for plaintiff Shri. Dipeseh Palwankar.
Neither defendant nor its counsel present to conduct the
cross examination.
No Cross examination :
Re-examination - Nil.
ROAC
Mumbai
Dated : 02.04.2025
(Shri S. B. Bhansali)
District Judge,
Court Room No.31 - Commercial
Court,
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai
-- 3 of 3 --