Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 13 Feb 2023 · CNR MHCC010016522018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: 1 MHCC010016522018 Presented on 31-01-2018 Registered on 01-03-2018 Decided on 13-02-2023 Duration Yrs. M. Days 05 00 13 EXHIBIT: 07 IN THE COURT OF JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO.272 OF 2018 Amrit Nandlal Talreja, adult, Indian Inhabitant of Bombay, aged 31 years, carrying on Business at 34, Dariya Mahal, A, 80, Nepeansea Road, Mumbai- 400 006. ...Plaintiff VERSUS 1. RSG Infotech (P) Ltd. A Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, carrying on business at 1st Floor, Maina Gul Building, Ceaser Road, Amboli, Andheri (West) Mumbai-400 058. -- 1 of 6 -- – 2 – Exp. Judg in Sum Suit No.272/2018 2. Jyoti Achary Adult Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai, Age and full name not known, Residing at A-403, Orchid Valley of Flowers, Thakur Village, Kandivali (East), Mumbai- 400 101. 3. Anil Achary Adult Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai, Age and full name not known, Residing at A-403, Orchid Valley of Flowers, Thakur Village, Kandivali (East), Mumbai- 400 101. ( Defendant Nos.2 and 3 carry on business at the address of the Defendant No.1. ...Defendants Appearance : Ld. Adv. Ms. Kavita Lalwani for plaintiff. Defendants absent ( Exparte). CORAM : DR. S. D. TAWSHIKAR (Court Room No.61) DATE : 13/02/2023. JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court) This is the suit filed under Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'CPC') for recovery of principal sum Rs.75,000/- against defendants along with interest thereon at the rate -- 2 of 6 -- – 3 – Exp. Judg in Sum Suit No.272/2018 of 18% per annum (p.a) from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff’s case- 2. Plaintiff claims to have advanced a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs in favour of defendant No.1 and against the same, defendant No.1 issued a Bill of Exchange in favour of the plaintiff on 16-12-2015. The said Bill of Exchange is accepted and endorsed by defendant Nos. 2 and 3. 3. Plaintiff contends that defendants, from time to time, have repaid an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/-. The last installment of part payment is received by plaintiff on 04-08-2017 by way of NEFT. Defendants had issued Cheuqe of Rs. 75,000/- bearing No. 117868 dated 08-11-2017, in favour of plaintiff. When plaintiff tried to encash the same, it was dishonoured for the reason “Funds Insufficient”. 4. Plaintiff issued a demand Notice on 17-11-2017 and called upon defendants to repay the outstanding amount of Rs.75,000/- along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. Despite receipt of the notice, defendants failed to pay the said amount. Hence plaintiff has approached this Court seeking recovery of the said amount. 5. Plaintiff had filed Summons for Judgment as per sub rule (4) of rule 2 of Order XXXVII of CPC. Despite the service of the Summons for Judgment, defendants failed to file reply and thereby further failed to seek leave to defend. Therefore, suit proceeded exparte/without further participation of the defendants. 6. So as to prove the claim, plaintiff has filed claim affidavit at Exh. 4 and reiterated the claim. Plaintiff also placed on record the -- 3 of 6 -- – 4 – Exp. Judg in Sum Suit No.272/2018 original Bill of Exchange at Exh. 5 and the office copy of the demand notice dated 17-11-2017 at Exh.6 along with proof of its service. 7. Ld. Adv. for plaintiff submits that as defendants failed to seek leave to defend, in view of Rule 3 (6) of Order XXXVII, plaintiff is entitled for decree. She further submits that plaintiff’s case is based upon dishonored Bill of Exchange. The original dishonoured Bill of Exchange and the demand notice is placed on record. As defendants failed to pay the outstanding amount, suit be decreed. 8. Sub rule (6) of rule 3 of order XXXVII of CPC stipulates that if defendant fails to apply for leave to defend, plaintiff shall be entitled to judgment forthwith. In matter in hand, as defendants failed to file reply/leave to defend, naturally plaintiff is entitled for the judgment. 9. Apart from the aforesaid statutory benefit, plaintiff has further filed claim affidavit and has reiterated the claim. The original Bill of Exchange is placed on record. The contention of plaintiff that he has received part payment of Rs. 1,25,000/-, is not disputed. The last installment of part payment is dated 04-08-2017, therefore the suit is well within limitation. As such, there is no contra evidence to dispute the claim raised by the plaintiff. Therefore, I hold that the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of principal amount. 10. Ld. advocate Ms. Kavita Lalwani for plaintiff submits that as the suit is based on negotiable instrument therefore interest at the rate of 18% be awarded. Admittedly, there is nothing on record to infer about the term as to the payment of interest by the defendants. However, considering the fact that the amount of plaintiff is withhold by the defendants since considerable time, plaintiff deserves reasonable -- 4 of 6 -- – 5 – Exp. Judg in Sum Suit No.272/2018 interest from the date of filing of the suit. Considering over all facts and circumstances of the case, I find awarding interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit, would meet ends of justice. Hence, the order. ORDER 1. Summary Suit No. 272 of 2018 is partly decreed with costs. 2. Defendants, jointly and severally, shall pay an amount of Rs. 75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) to the plaintiff along with interest at the rate of 09 % p.a. from the date of filing of the suit i.e. 31-01-2018, till realization of entire amount. 3. In view of the aforesaid order, Summons for Judgment No.235 of 2018 stands disposed of. 4. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff, as per rules. 5. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (Dr. S. D. Tawshikar) Judge, City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai. Date: 13-02-2023 Court Room No.61 Dictated on : 13-02-2023 Printed on : 16-02-2023 Corrected & signed on : 17-02-2023 -- 5 of 6 -- – 6 – Exp. Judg in Sum Suit No.272/2018 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 20-02-2023 at 5.45p.m. Mrs. V. V. Malgaonkar Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) Dr. S. D. Tawshikar C.R. No.61 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 13-02-2023 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P. O. on 17-02-2023 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 20-02-2023 -- 6 of 6 --
