Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 06 Aug 2022 · CNR MHCC010016212020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: MHCC010016212020 CNR NO. MHCC010016212020 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.629 OF 2020 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1496 OF 2017 M/s. Ledvance Private Limited ]… Petitioners V/s. Mr. Chetan Badani ]..Applicant/Respondents Appearances : Ld. Adv. Mr. Ajit Aanekar for plaintiff. Ld.Adv. Meenal Doshi for defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SMT. R.K. KSHIRSAGAR (C.R.No.13) DATED : 6th August, 2022 ORAL ORDER 1. The present Notice of Motion is taken out by the defendant under VII Rule XI of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. It was submitted by the defendant that the plaintiff filed the present suit on 20.09.2017. The defendant was served on 08.03.2018 and he appeared on 15.03.2018. Thereafter, the plaintiff presented a draft Summons for Judgement on 24.08.2018. Therefore, -- 1 of 4 -- 2 NM 629/2020 in Suit 1496/2017 the Summons for Judgement was taken out after a delay of 11 months from the date of filing of the suit. As per the Rule 119 Sub Rule 4 of Bombay City Civil and Sessions Court Rule, the plaintiff has to apply for a decree within six months from the filing of the claim. The plaintiff had not taken out Summons for Judgement within six months and therefore, the suit be rejected under Order VII Rule XI of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The plaintiff filed reply to the Notice of Motion and denied the contention of defendant. It was submitted that as per Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure no time limit has been given for taking out Summons for Judgement. Moreover, the defendant cannot raise defence of limitation at this stage. The Bombay City Civil and Sessions Court Rule does not provide automatic dismissal of the suit and therefore, the present Notice of Motion is not maintainable and hence, it be dismissed. 3. Heard the Learned Advocate for both the parties at length. The contents are not reproduced. 4. The plaintiff admittedly had filed a suit in the year 2017. However, the suit was not registered due to office objections. Ultimately, on 26.02.2016 the Summary suit was registered and assigned to the Court. Thereafter, on 15.03.2018 the defendant appeared and filed vakalatnama. On 24.08.2018 the plaintiff had sought leave to register the Summons for Judgement. It therefore, seems that after the matter was assigned to this Court the plaintiff had taken out the Summons for Judgement on appearance of the defendant. -- 2 of 4 -- 3 NM 629/2020 in Suit 1496/2017 Presently the matter was fixed for Summons for Judgement hearing and the defendant had also sought leave to defend and filed reply to Summons for Judgement and thereafter the defendant has taken out this Notice of Motion. It seems that till date no leave to defend is granted to the defendant. The defendant therefore cannot raise defence of limitation without grant of leave to defend. So far as the rules under Bombay City Civil and Sessions Court are concerned, it does not provide for the dismissal of the suit immediately. The plaintiff herein had taken out the Summons for Judgement after the appearance of defendant. Earlier the matter was pending only for removal of objection and it was only in the month of February, 2018 the matter was assigned to this Court. It therefore, seems that there is no delay in taking out Summons for Judgment and therefore, the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule XI of the Code of Civil Procedure at this stage, therefore, I, proceed to pass the following order: ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No.629 of 2020 is dismissed. 2. Parties to bear their own costs. ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) Dt.: 06082022 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI Dictated on : 06082022 Transcribed on : 10082022 checked on : 10082022 Signed on : 10082022 ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 3 of 4 -- 4 NM 629/2020 in Suit 1496/2017 “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 10.08.2022 at 04.15 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (VARSHA U. PAWAR) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge H.H.J.Smt.R.K.Kshirsagar (COURT ROOM NO.13) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 06.08.2022 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 10.08.2022 Judgment/order uploaded on 10.08.2022 -- 4 of 4 --
