EXECUTION APPLN
SUBHASH SOPAN SHEREKARVsAJIT VASANT SULAKHI
CNR MHCC010015912018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 13th December 2018
TrustJury record updated 08 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100025/2018
- Registration Date
- 29 Jan 2018
Advocates
0No advocate information is available in this record.
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec ASSIGN
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 28-02-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Mr. Jain prays for Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 48 of CPC without notice u/o. XXI R. 22 as the Execution is within 2 years of the Decree. Issue warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 48 of CPC, returnable on 19/06/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 19-06-2018 Date: 19-06-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjd to 24/08/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2018 Date: 24-08-2018 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Shri Jain, adjourned to 24/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 24-10-2018 Date: 24-10-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Mr. Jain adjd to 30/10/2018, for submission of service report of warrant issued earlier. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2018 Date: 30-10-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Jain, adjd to 12/11/2018, for filing service report of warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 12-11-2018 Date: 12-11-2018 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Shri Jain, for filing service report of warrant, adjourned to 29/11/2018.. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2018 Date: 29-11-2018 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Shri Jain, for submitting status of warrant, adjourned to 03/12/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2018 Date: 03-12-2018 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Shri Jain, adjourned to 13/12/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2018 Date: 13-12-2018 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff present. Shri Jain states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 05/03/2018, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 13-12-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 101140/2018 Filing Date: 29-01-2018 First Hearing Date: 28th February 2018 Decision Date: 13th December 2018 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
