Skip to main content
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 29th February 2020

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100605/2019
Registration Date
08 Feb 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-02-2019
    Business: Adv. Parmar for Plaintiff present.
    Ex.4 Affidavit of evidence filed by Adv for Plaintiff t.o.r.
    Ex.5 Compilation of documents filed by Adv for Plaintiff t.o.r.
    Plff is directed to file original NM on record.
    Adj for NM service to 02.03.2019.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2019
    
    Date: 02-03-2019
    Business: CA of Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Omprakash for Plaintiff present.
    He filed original contempt NM no.605/19.
    Affidavit of service filed by Plaintiff t.o.r.
    Adj for NM reply to 05.04.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 05-04-2019
    
    Date: 05-04-2019
    Business: Adv. Parmar for Plaintiff present.
    He tendered draft Ch/s t.o.r.
    Leave granted to register it.
    Adv. Ankit Pathak filed V/n for Defendant no.7 t.o.r.
    Copy  of Ch/s given to Defendant no.7.
    Adj for service of Ch/s to other defendants to 06.06.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2019
    
    Date: 06-06-2019
    Business: As Court is on leave, hence board is discharged and matter is adjourned.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2019
    
    Date: 18-07-2019
    Business: Plff and Adv absent.
    Deft and Adv absent.
    Adj for reply and service of Ch/s to other defendants to 16.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 16-08-2019
    
    Date: 16-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Parmar for Plaintiff present.
    He tendered original Ch/s No.975/19 t.o.r.
    Adv. Anket Pathak for defendant no.7 present.
    Adv for defendant no.7 submitted that complete copy of NM No. 605/19 is not supplied.
    Plaintiff is directed to supply complete set of copy in relation to NM No.605/19 in advance to the concerned defendant.
    Adj for reply of NM and Ch/s to 31.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 31-08-2019
    
    Date: 31-08-2019
    Business: Matter Adjd to 25/09/2019 for Compliance and NM reply.
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2019
    
    Date: 25-09-2019
    Business: Adv. Parmar for Plaintiff
    Adv. Samrudhi for defendant  no 7
    Adv. For plaintiff has filed amended plaint. t.o.r
    He also tendered contempt NM 605/19
    Adv. For defendant  no 7 sought time to file reply to NM on the count that inspection fo the documents relied upon by the plaintiff    is not given. There, time is granted to file reply.
    Adjd. to 15.10.2019 for NM reply
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2019
    
    Date: 15-10-2019
    Business: CA of plaintiff present.
    Adv. Samrudhhi for defendant no 7 present.
    She filed reply to contempt NM 605/19.
    Copy is given to CA of plaintiff.
    Adjd. for rejoinder to 16.11.2019
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2019
    
    Date: 16-11-2019
    Business: Adv. Krisha Jethani for defendant no 7 present.
    Adv. J.B. Parmar for plaintiff present.
    Rejoinder not filed by plaintiff.
    Adv. For plaintiff submitted that plaintiff does not want to adduce evidence in relation to contempt NM.
    Therefore, adjourned for NM hearing to 10.12.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2019
    
    Date: 10-12-2019
    Business: Adv. J.B. Parmar for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Narvekar for defendant no 7 present.
    KB
    LO
    Adv. J.B. Parmar for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Narvekar for defendant no 7 present.
    Adv. for plaintiff sought adjournment  Granted.
    With consent both the parties adjourned to 17.01.2019 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 17-01-2020
    
    Date: 17-01-2020
    Business: Adv. Parmar for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Narvekar for defendant No.7 present.
    KB
    LO
    Evidence closer pursis filed by adv. for plaintiff t.o.r.
    Matter is adjourned for NM hearing to 20.02.2020 on request of  advocate for plaintiff.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 20-02-2020
    
    Date: 20-02-2020
    Business: Adv Parmar for plff present.
    Adv Narvekar for deft no. 7 present.
    Heard both parties on NM 605/2019.
    Matter stands Adj for NM order to 28/02/2020.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2020
    
    Date: 28-02-2020
    Business: Adjd 29.02.20
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 29-02-2020
    
    Date: 28-02-2020
    Business: Adjd 29.02.20
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 29-02-2020
    
    Date: 29-02-2020
    Business: NM Dismissed
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 29-02-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101664/2019
    Filing Date: 08-02-2019
    First Hearing Date: 08th February 2019
    Decision Date: 29th February 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    29 Feb 2020

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Contempt NM No.605/2019 ..1.. S.C. Suit No.3486/1997 CNR No. MHCC01-001550-2019 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI CONTEMPT NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 605 OF 2019 IN S. C. SUIT NO.3486 OF 1997 Saifee Nazimuddin Khambhati. .. Plaintiff Versus Mulla Shoebbhai Saifuddin Baldiwalla (Since deceased) and others. .. Defendants. AND Bharmal Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., having office at 5/546, Sitafal Wadi, Mazgaon, Mumbai. ..Respondent. Advocates Parmar for the plaintiff. Narvekar for defendant no.7.…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.