Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Mohd. Hanif Ali Hasan AnsariVsThe Designated Officer -II and Anr. +1 more

CNR MHCC0100148820205-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 28th November 2023

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100408/2020
Registration Date
06 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 36 · 38

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 07-02-2020
    Business: By precipe
    Advocate Prashant Sutar  for plaintiff present.
    He tendered draft N/M along with affidavit.
    O-Leave is granted to register draft N/M.
    Advocate Vyavahre for defendant/BMC present.
    Shri Sanip Yadav, Jr. Eng. B and  F. Dept. E-Ward present.
    He has made statement that he will not take action till BMC files reply.
    Adjourned for N/M Reply to 17/02/2020.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2020
    
    Date: 17-02-2020
    Business: As court is on Leave.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2020
    
    Date: 01-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2020
    
    Date: 16-04-2020
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 27-05-2020
    
    Date: 27-05-2020
    Business: In view of extension of Lockdown period pursuant to the declaration of Novel Corona Virus (Covid-19) as global pandemic by WHO and as per Office Order 78 of 2020, matter adjourned
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2020
    
    Date: 12-06-2020
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 03-08-2020
    
    Date: 03-08-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2020
    
    Date: 23-09-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 11-11-2020
    
    Date: 11-11-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2021
    
    Date: 12-02-2021
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Advocate for defendant/BMC present.
    Adjourned for N/M Reply to 23/04/2021.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2021
    
    Date: 23-04-2021
    Business: Due to Covid-19. Matter is adjourned.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 23-08-2021
    
    Date: 23-08-2021
    Business: Adv. P. N. Sutar present for plaintiff and sought adjournment.
    Adv absent  for MCGM/defendant.
    Matter adjourned for reply to. 30/09/21.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2021
    
    Date: 30-09-2021
    Business: None present present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Vidya Vyavahare present for MCGM/defendant and sought adjournment.
    Matter adjourned for reply to. 20/11/21
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2021
    
    Date: 20-11-2021
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Sutar present for MCGM/defendant.
    As plaintiff and his adv. absent, and As court is busy in hearing arguments on chs no. 870/2021 in suit no. 528/2014, and MA. no. 68/2021, passing order on  M. A. no. 68/2021, remaining board is discharged and, Matter adjourned for cs order to 15/01/22.
    Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2022
    
    Date: 15-01-2022
    Business: In view of the office order no. 07/2022 dated. 07/01/22 of Hon''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dated 06/01/22 of Hon''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge of COVID-19 cases (all variants) and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned without passing any adverse order against the party/s. Hence, matter is adjourned to
    Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 08-03-2022
    
    Date: 08-03-2022
    Business: As presiding officer is on leave. Hence, matter is adjourned to
    Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 06-05-2022
    
    Date: 06-05-2022
    Business: The court is busy in hearing urgent matters i.e Stamp No. 5110 of 2022 and High Court Time Bound matter i.e. Suit No.419 of 2022 and order dictate in Suit No .130 of 2022, Suit No.131 of 2022 and 1019 of 2022 hence, for want of time following board discharged.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2022
    
    Date: 22-07-2022
    Business: Court is busy.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2022
    
    Date: 26-08-2022
    Business: Court is busy in order dictating in Ch.s No. 1215/2022. Hence want of time matter is adjourned.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2022
    
    Date: 14-10-2022
    Business: As court is busy in hearing urgent matter i.e. Suit No. 2261 of 2022 and order dictating in High Court Time Bound Matter Suit No. 187 of 2019. Hence want of time board is discharged.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2022
    
    Date: 15-12-2022
    Business: As Court is busy in urgent hearing of High Court Time Bound Matter i.e. Suit No. 116 of 2012. Hence want of time board is discharged.
    Matter is adjd for NM on 21-02-2023
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2023
    
    Date: 21-02-2023
    Business: As court is on leave. Hence, matter adjourned.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2023
    
    Date: 27-04-2023
    Business: None for Plaintiff present.
    Adv for BMC present.
    Today court is busy in final hearing of High Court Time Bound Matter i.e. Suit No. 2599 of 2015 and Suit No. 2610 of 2009 and Stamp No 4692/2023.
    Matter is adjd for NM hearing on 01-08-2023
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 01-08-2023
    
    Date: 01-08-2023
    Business: Adv. Prashant Sutar for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Vyavhare for defendant/ BMC present.
    Adv. for the plaintiff tendered registered N/M No.720/2023 along with affidavit in support, TOR. Copy supplied to other side.
    Matter is adjd.  to 03/10/2023 for NM reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2023
    
    Date: 01-08-2023
    Business: Adv. Prashant Sutar for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Vyavhare for defendant/ BMC present.
    Adv. for the plaintiff tendered registered N/M No.720/2023 along with affidavit in support, TOR. Copy supplied to other side.
    Matter is adjd.  to 03/10/2023 for NM reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2023
    
    Date: 03-10-2023
    Business: Adv. Prashant Sutar for Plaintiff present.
    Adv.  Vidya Vyavahare for defendant/MCGM present.
    Exh.1 - Plaint.
    Exh. 2 -Vakalatnama of Plaintiff.
    Exh. 3 - Memorandum of address.
    Exh. 4 - List of documents.
    Ld. Adv. for MCGM has filed affidavit in reply cum written statement. TOR and marked at Exh. 5. Copy served to other side. O- R and R.
    Matter is adjd  to 28.11.2023 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2023
    
    Date: 28-11-2023
    Business: Adv. Prashant Sutar for plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Ms. Rawade for MCGM present.
    Mr. Kishor Jagdale JE. E ward.
    Order on NM No. 720/2020
    The ld. Adv for the plaintiff invited the application of this Court towards the copy of plan which is supposed to be approved bearing office no. GB/438/A of 23.12.1958.  He has also invited the attention of this Court towards the copy of handwritten reply dt. 25.11.2019 and speaking order dt. 23.12.2019 passed by the def. no. 1.  The ld. Adv for the plaintiff, therefore, submitted that at the time fo submitting reply to the impugned the notice, this plan was not available with the plaintiff. Thereafter, the plaintiff submitted reply dt. 02.01.2020 and 03.02.2020. However, speaking order was already passed 23.12.2019. He, therefore, vehemently submitted that, the matter may be remanded back with directions to the defendants to  consider these reply and approved plan dt. 23.12.1958 and thereafter, to pass afresh speaking order in respect of the notice structure.
    On the other hand, ld. Adv for the def./MCGM and the officer of MCGM present in the Court fairly conceded that the Corporation is ready to consider the aforesaid reply and plan and thereafter, will pass afresh speaking order.
    Hence, considering the submissions of both sides, following order in my view,  will meet out the ends of Justice.
    ORDER
    Notice of Motion No. 720/2020 stands disposed off in terms of following directions.
    i) The defendants are directed to considered the reply dt. 02.01.2020 and 03.02.2020 alongwith copy of approved plan dt. 23.12.1958 which is already  supplied by the plaintiff to the defendants.   After considering the aforesaid reply and plan the defendants shall pass afresh speaking order in respect of the notice structure.
    ii) In the meantime, the defendants shall not take any coercive action nor the plaintiff shall carry out any type of constructrual activities in repsect of the notice structure.
    Iii) After passing afresh speaking order by the defendants, 15 days time shall be granted to the plaintiff to challenge the order, if any.
    iv) The ld. Adv of for the plaintiff submitted that in view of the remanding the matter to pass afresh speaking order, the suit may also be disposed off.  Hence, the suit as well as NM No. 720/2021 stands disoposed off accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 28-11-2023

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101615/2020
    Filing Date: 04-02-2020
    First Hearing Date: 07th February 2020
    Decision Date: 28th November 2023
    Court Number And Judge: 5-COURT 05  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    28 Nov 2023

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 28.11.2023 CORAM: SHRI R. M. MISHRA, ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE C.R.NO.5 SU. 408/20 Adv. Prashant Sutar for plaintiff is present. Adv. Ms. Rawade for MCGM present. Mr. Kishor Jagdale JE. E ward. Order on NM No. 720/2020 The ld. Adv for the plaintiff invited the application of this Court towards the copy of plan which is supposed to be approved bearing office no. GB/438/A of 23.12.1958. He has also invited the attention of this Court towards…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.