Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Vasanji Ramji Shah HUF - Applicant Chetan Vasanji ShahVsVeena Sunil Martis 2 Charlie Dsouza

CNR MHCC0100148020192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 27th March 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100290/2019
Registration Date
06 Feb 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-02-2019
    Business: As P.O. is on leave, hence board is discharged and matter is adjourned.
    Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 27-03-2019
    
    Date: 27-03-2019
    Business: Adv. Pooja Nerurkar for Plaintiff present.
    She tendered original Ch/s no.290/19 t.o.r.
    Adv. Tiwari for Defendant present.
    He filed reply to Ch/s.
    Order below Ch/s No.290/19.
    Read Chamber summons, affidavit in support of it, reply of Defendant.
    Heard respective counsel for parties.
    Chamber summons is taken out seeking amendment in cause title of plaint as per schedule annexed to the chamber summons. It appears that applicant  has prayed for deletion of name of Karta of HUF on account of his death and substituting his name as Karta of HUF.
    Defendant has opposed chamber summons on the count that there is no documentary evidence filed by applicant to show that co-parceners have mutually agreed and appointed applicant as Karta of Plaintiff (HUF).
    It is pertinent to note that applicant in his affidavit of evidence specifically stated that he is appointed as Karta of the Plaintiff (HUF). There is no reason to disbelieve the statement of applicant in that regard. From copy of death certificate annexed to affidavit filed in support of chamber summons, it is clear that Karta of Plaintiff (HUF) namely Vasanji Ramji Shah died on 08.11.2018. Present chamber summons is taken out within prescribed period of 90 days from the date of death of Karta, so it is well within time. Therefore, chamber summons deserves to be allowed. Hence, pass following order.
    ORDER
    1. Chamber Summons No.290 of 2019 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
    2. Applicant to carry out amendment within two weeks from date of order.
    Accordingly, chamber summons is disposed off.
    Adj for compliance to 06.06.2019.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 27-03-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101639/2019
    Filing Date: 06-02-2019
    First Hearing Date: 15th February 2019
    Decision Date: 27th March 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    27 Mar 2019

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 27.03.2019 SU 1659/13 @ Ch/s 290/19 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. Pooja Nerurkar for Plaintiff present. She tendered original Ch/s no.290/19 t.o.r. Adv. Tiwari for Defendant present. He filed reply to Ch/s. Order below Ch/s No.290/19. Read Chamber summons, affidavit in support of it, reply of Defendant. Heard respective counsel for parties. Chamber summons is taken out seeking amendment in cause title of plaint as per schedule annexed to the chamber…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.