Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 11 Jan 2019 · CNR MHCC010014712018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: :1: Ch. Sum. No.198/2018 in Sum. Suit No.940/2017 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.198 OF 2018 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 940 OF 2017 CNR NO.: MHCC010014712018 Mr. Sainath Taterao Pawar ]….Plaintiff. V/s. Mrs. Shubhangi Ashok Sawai ]….Defendant. Appearances: Advocate Ms. Madhuri R. Raibagkar for the Plaintiff. Advocate Mrs. Pallavi Gandhi for the Defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE S.P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO.9) DATED : 11th JANUARY, 2019. ORAL ORDER 1. This is an application filed by defendant to condone delay of 83 days in filing the appearance and vakalatnama. 2. Defendant has stated that she is senior citizen and 78 years old lady and suffering from various old age physical aliment/diseases such as high blood pressure, chest pain and taking blood thinner medication. She has further stated that she is not keeping well due to chest pain and high blood pressure from 07.11.2017 and she was advised to take the bedrest for 15 days. She stated that after recovery somewhere on 18 th December 2017, she contacted her Advocate and handed over the papers to him and on perusal of papers, Advocate told her that there is delay in filing appearance. -- 1 of 3 -- :2: Ch. Sum. No.198/2018 in Sum. Suit No.940/2017 3. Plaintiff has filed reply to this Chamber Summons and contended that defendant should be put strict proof regarding her aliment/diseases and contended that though defendant had chest pain, why she has choose to consult only the MBBS doctor instead of any specialist doctor. Plaintiff has further contended that the intention of the defendant is only to delay the proceedings. 4. It is pertinent to see that defendant is very old age of 78 years. She has also produced Medical Certificate stating that she was suffering from chest pain and high blood pressure. Considering the age of the defendant that she is 78 years old, it is more probable that due to old age and illhealth there is delay in filing appearance. Hence, in the present case, it appears that the delay caused is not with the intention to delay the matter. At the same time, plaintiff has to be compensated for delay caused. Hence, following order: ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No.198/2018 is granted, subject to cost of Rs.1,800/ to be given by defendant to plaintiff. 2. Chamber Summons No.198/2018 stands disposed off. (S.P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 11.01.2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 11.01.2019 Transcribed on : 11.01.2019 Signed on : 11.01.2019 -- 2 of 3 -- :3: Ch. Sum. No.198/2018 in Sum. Suit No.940/2017 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 15.01.2019 At 2:58 pm. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Ms. S.P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.09) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 11.01.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 11.01.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 15.01.2019 -- 3 of 3 --
