Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Hamid KhiljiVsMCGM

CNR MHCC0100145520186-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 15th March 2019

TrustJury record updated 08 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100193/2018
Registration Date
29 Jan 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Hamid Khilji

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-04-2018
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 17-07-2018
    
    Date: 17-07-2018
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2018
    
    Date: 24-08-2018
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2018
    
    Date: 17-10-2018
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2019
    
    Date: 09-01-2019
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2019
    
    Date: 15-03-2019
    Business: Advocate Mr. S. K. Chaurasiya for plaintiff present with plaintiff.
    Advocate Mr. Sutar for deft./MMC present and filed draft NM a/w W.S.
    Heard both the sides on ch/s no. 193/18.
    According to plaintiff the defendant high handedly and illegally demolished the suit premises. Defendant even not accepted the notice before demolition. Perused the proposed amendment. Plaintiff has sought amendment in respect of the demolition of structure. Plaintiff has challenged the notice u/s 351 of MMC Act. Therefore, I find that the proposed amendment are necessary to determine the controversy between the parties. Hence, ch/s no. 193/18 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) of the ch/s and disposed of accordingly. Plaintiff to carry the amendment within 14 days.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 15-03-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101337/2018
    Filing Date: 29-01-2018
    First Hearing Date: 19th April 2018
    Decision Date: 15th March 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06  ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    15 Mar 2019
    Order Details: Chamber summons
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0100193/2018
    Hamid Khilji Vs MCGM
    Date : 15-03-2019
    Business : Advocate Mr. S. K. Chaurasiya for plaintiff present with
    plaintiff. Advocate Mr. Sutar for deft./MMC present and
    filed draft NM a/w W.S. Heard both the sides on ch/s no.
    193/18. According to plaintiff the defendant high handedly
    and illegally demolished the suit premises. Defendant even
    not accepted the notice before demolition. Perused the
    proposed amendment. Plaintiff has sought amendment in
    respect of the demolition of structure. Plaintiff has
    challenged the notice u/s 351 of MMC Act. Therefore, I
    find that the proposed amendment are necessary to
    determine the controversy between the parties. Hence, ch/s
    no. 193/18 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) of
    the ch/s and disposed of accordingly. Plaintiff to carry the
    amendment within 14 days.
    Nature of Disposal : ALLOWED
    Disposal Date : 15-03-2019
    COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    15 Mar 2019
    Order Details: Chamber summons
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0100193/2018
    Hamid Khilji Vs MCGM
    Date : 15-03-2019
    Business : Advocate Mr. S. K. Chaurasiya for plaintiff present with
    plaintiff. Advocate Mr. Sutar for deft./MMC present and
    filed draft NM a/w W.S. Heard both the sides on ch/s no.
    193/18. According to plaintiff the defendant high handedly
    and illegally demolished the suit premises. Defendant even
    not accepted the notice before demolition. Perused the
    proposed amendment. Plaintiff has sought amendment in
    respect of the demolition of structure. Plaintiff has
    challenged the notice u/s 351 of MMC Act. Therefore, I
    find that the proposed amendment are necessary to
    determine the controversy between the parties. Hence, ch/s
    no. 193/18 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) of
    the ch/s and disposed of accordingly. Plaintiff to carry the
    amendment within 14 days.
    Nature of Disposal : ALLOWED
    Disposal Date : 15-03-2019
    COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.