SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Jyoti Prakash KaraneVsSanjay Sudam Mandlik +1 more

CNR MHCC01001392201861-COURT 61 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

City Civil Court, Mumbai

Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)

CASE DISPOSED

Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

Decision Date: 25th February 2026

TrustJury record updated 08 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number: 100380/2018
Registration Date: 07 Feb 2018

Advocates

For Petitioner

Vikas B. Pandey

For Respondent

Not available

Parties

Petitioner

1Jyoti Prakash Karane

Respondent

Acts & Sections

Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History

Date: 28-02-2018
Business: Adv. Pandey for plaintiff present and tendered original notice of motion no.841/2018 along with affidavit, taken on record
Adv. Ansari  for  D-1 present and filed vakalatnama on behalf of D-1,tor
He filed draft notice of motion along with affidavit, taken on record
O- Leave granted to register draft notice of motion.
Adv. Ms. Rubina for D-2 present and filed reply to NM No.841/2018, taken on record
Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 seeks time to file reply to the notice of motion. The reply be served one week in advance to the plaintiff and other defendants.
Matter adj. for NM Reply and NM Hearing to 03.04.2018.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2018

Date: 03-04-2018
Business: Adv. Pande for plaintiff present.
Adv. Nepian Sali for D-1 present and filed reply to NM No.841/2018.
He also tendered original notice of motion no. 1357/2018 alongwith affidavit.
Adv. Nikhil Wabhale for D-2 present
Ld. Counsel for defendants no.1 and 2 submit that the apprehension of the plaintiff that they will create third party interest in the suit premises is not justified since the premises is owned by BMC and therefore question of creating third party by defendants does not arise. They further submit that BMC is a necessary party to this suit. In view of this statement, there is no urgency in this matter.
Hence list for Rejoinder to 09.07.2018.
Next Purpose: REJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 09-07-2018

Date: 09-07-2018
Business: Plaintiff in person present. Adv. for pltff absent.
Adv. for D-1 present.
Adv. Dudhia for D-2 present.
  Plaintiff in person filed reply to the NM 1357/18 filed by D-1. TOR. She undertakes to give copy to Ld. counsel for D-2. Copy of reply to NM is already served to D-1.
  Plaintiff in person also filed two affidavits in rejoinder. TOR.
Adjd on 26.10.18 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2018

Date: 26-10-2018
Business: Adv. Vikas Pandey for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sadhvik for defendant no.1 present and states that Adv. Kadam has expired. Therefore he seeks time for hearing in the NM. Time granted.
Adv. Wabhade for defendant no.2 present.
Matter adj. for NM Hearing to 26.03.2019.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2018

Date: 13-11-2018
Business: Not on Board Taken on Board By Precipe
Adv. Ms. Radhika for D-2 present and filed draft notice of motion alongwith affidavit. Leave granted to register draft notice of motion. She undertakes to serve copy of draft NM to the other side.
Matter already adj. to 26.03.2019.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2019

Date: 26-03-2019
Business: Adv. Pandey for plaintiff present and filed reply in NM no. 4289/2018.
Adv. Ms. Radhika Nayak for D-2 present and tendered original notice of motion no. 4289/2018 and seeks time for arguing the NM as her senior is busy before Hon\''ble High Court. Time granted.
Adv. Thakur for D-1 present and seeks time to file VP on behalf of
D-1.
Matter adj. for NM Hearing to 26.07.2019.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2019

Date: 26-07-2019
Business: Court is busy in dictating order in Suit No. 1289/15 and 2218/17  Hence, board discharged.
Matter stands Adj for NM hearing to 28.08.2019
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-08-2019

Date: 28-08-2019
Business: As the Court is busy in dictating order in suit no. 2619/2014, 837/2016 and 9083/1995 and recording evidence in NDPS Spl. Case 3/2018. Hence board discharged.
Matter stands Adj to 01/10/2019 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2019

Date: 01-10-2019
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-11-2019

Date: 21-11-2019
Business: Adv. Mandavkar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Girish Thakur for defendant no. 1 present and filed VP.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant no. 1.
Adv. Ishan Sayyed for defendant no. 2 present.
Heard both sides. Ld. counsel for defendant no. 1 submitted that he is not having copy of reply in NM no. 1357/18.  Hence, prayed for short adjournment. Ld. counsel for plaintiff assured to supply additional copy of reply.
By consent, Matter stands Adj for NM hearing to 23.11.19.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-11-2019

Date: 23-11-2019
Business: Adv. Mandavkar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Girish Thakur for defendant no. 1 present.
Adv. Ishan Sayyad for defendant no. 2 present.
Heard both sides on NM no. 1357/18.
Matter stands Adj for Order on NM no. 1357/18 to 02.12.19.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 02-12-2019

Date: 02-12-2019
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv.  Girish Thakur for defendant no. 1 present.
Adv. Ishan Sayyed for defendant no. 2 present.
  FRSR following order is passed on NM no. 1357/18.
                                  ORDER
1.     Notice of Motion no. 1357/18 is hereby dismissed as not maintainable in law.
2.        Suit shall proceed further for trial and decision as per law.
           NM stands disposed of accordingly.
Matter stands Adj for NM hearing to 15.01.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2020

Date: 15-01-2020
Business: Adv. Mandavkar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Pooja Yadav for defendant no. 2 present.
Heard both sides on NM no. 4289/18.
Ld. counsel for defendant no. 2 filed on record the WS and documents as per index to show that WS was ready on 23.10.2018.
Matter stands Adj for orders on NM no. 4289/18 to 04.02.2020.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2020

Date: 04-02-2020
Business: Plaintiff present in person.
Adv. Priyank Daga for defendant present.
  FRSR following order is passed NM no. 4289/18.
                                  ORDER
1.       Notice of motion no. 4289/18 is hereby allowed and made absolute subject to defendant no. 2 paying cost of Rs. 2,000/- to the plaintiff on account of delay in the suit within the period of four weeks from today.
2.      If the above directions are complied with by the defendant no. 2, the WS of the defendant no. 2 shall be taken on record.
          NM is disposed of accordingly.
Matter stands Adj for compliance to 18.02.2020.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 18-02-2020

Date: 18-02-2020
Business: Adv. Mandavkar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Puja Yadav for defendant no. 2 present and submitted that today she is making compliance of the order dated 04.02.2020 by paying cost of Rs. 2000/- to the Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Accordingly, Cost of Rs. 2000/- paid to the Ld. counsel for plaintiff before the court. In view of the above compliance, WS of defendant no. 2 is taken on record.
Written statement on behalf of defendant no. 2. TOR.
Matter stands Adj for hearing on NM no. 841/18 to 12.03.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2020

Date: 12-03-2020
Business: Court is busy in dictating order in Suit no. 136/16 and 3449/11. Hence, board is discharged.
Matter stands Adj for hearing on NM to 12.06.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2020

Date: 12-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2020

Date: 05-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 11-11-2020

Date: 11-11-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2021

Date: 20-01-2021
Business: None for Plaintiff.
Advocate Girish Rathod for defendant no.1 present.
Advocate Isha Bafna i/b Jaykar and Partners for defendant no.2 present.
Suit to proceed without written statement of defendant no.1.
The case is adjourned to 23.02.2021 for framing of issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 23-02-2021

Date: 23-02-2021
Business: None for Plaintiff.
Advocate Girish Thakur for defendant no. 1 present.
Advocate Ms. Pooja Yadav I/b Jayakar and Partners for defendant no. 2 present.
As Court is busy in recording evidence in SU No. 8472/2000 and hearing arguments in SU No.651/13 and 7038/06 the morning session board is discharged.
The case is adjourned to 30.03.2021  for framing issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 30-03-2021

Date: 30-03-2021
Business: In view of guidelines dated 23.02.2021 directed to be implemented from 25.03.2021 limited matters are taken up. Hence, except the daily board, the regular board is discharged.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2021

Date: 11-06-2021
Business: In view of office order No. 100/2021 dtd. 04.06.2021  of Hon''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dtd. 16.04.2021 issued by Hon''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned owing to absence of the parties.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2021

Date: 04-08-2021
Business: -
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2021

Date: 05-10-2021
Business: Adv. Ridhima Mangoankar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Girish Thakur for Deft. No.1 present.
Adv. Dhwani Parekh I/b Jayakar and Partners for Deft. No.2 present.
As court is busy in hearing final argument in SU No.3002/04. Hence,
matter stands adjourned to 22.11.2021 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2021

Date: 22-11-2021
Business: Court is on leave. Hence, Board is discharged.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2022

Date: 14-01-2022
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-02-2022

Date: 23-02-2022
Business: Matter called out at 3.07 p.m.
Adv. Girish Thokur for Deft. No.1 present. He already tendered draft NM on 04.08.2021.
O-Leave granted to register.
Draft NM haded over to the defendant for registration.
He is directed to serve copy to the plaintiff.
Adv. Zeeshan Syed for Deft. No.2 present.
Matter stands adjourned to 07.04.2022 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 07-04-2022

Date: 07-04-2022
Business: Court is on leave in second session. Hence board discharged.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2022

Date: 24-06-2022
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Girish Thakur  for defendant no. 1 present. He tendered
regd. N/M No. 1030/22. T.O.R.
Adv.  Zeeshan Syed for defendant no. 2 present.
Matter stands adjourned for reply to 08/08/2022.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2022

Date: 08-08-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff and Deft. no.1.
Adv. Saumitra for Deft. no.2 present.
Put up for NM dismissal.
Matter stands adjourned to 18.10.2022 for NM dismissal.
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2022

Date: 18-10-2022
Business: Adv. Ayush Tiwari for plaintiff present. He is seeking time to file reply. Time granted.
Adv. Girish Thakur for Deft. no.1 present. He tendered affidavit of service in NM No.1030/2022. TOR.
Adv. Bhoomi Upadhyay for Deft. no.2 present.
Heard plaintiff and Deft. no.1 on NM No.1030/22.
Following F.R.S.R. order is passed in NM No.1030/2022.
ORDER
1.    Notice of Motion No.1030 of 2022 in Suit No.380 of 2018 is hereby allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs.3,000/-.
2.    Delay stands condoned.
3.  Written statement already filed on record be exhibited after the payment of costs of Rs.3,000/-.
4.    Costs shall be paid on or before next date.
5.    Notice of Motion stands disposed of accordingly.
Matter stands adjourned to 17.12.2022 for compliance/NM hearing.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2022

Date: 17-12-2022
Business: Adv. Saumitra Yedgaonkar for Deft. no.2 present.
None present for plaintiff.
Compliance not done.
Matter stands adjourned to 21.02.2023 compliance/order.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2023

Date: 21-02-2023
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Girish Thakur for defendant No.1 present.
Adv. Ashok Pandey for defendant No.2 present.
Plaintiff absent. The defendant No.1 is ready to pay the cost to the plaintiff, in consequent to absence of plaintiff the defendant No.1 is directed to deposit the cost in court till tomorrow.
PLA department to accept the cost.
Parties to act upon authenticate copy.
Matter stands adjourned on 24.04.2023 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2023

Date: 24-04-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Girish Thakur for defendant No.1 present.
Adv. Vinit Udernani I/b Jayakar and Partners for defendant No.2 present.
Compliance done by the defendant No.1.
Matter stands adjourned on 26.07.2023 for hearing on NM.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2023

Date: 26-07-2023
Business: As P.O.is on leave, matter is adjourned.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2023

Date: 09-10-2023
Business: None for Plaintiff present.
Adv Girish Thakkar for deft no. 1 present.
Adv Arushi Sanghai i/b Jayakar and partners for defendant no. 2 present.
Plaintiff is absent hence, put up for dismissal of NM.
Matter stands adjourned on  12-12-2023 for dismissal of NM.
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2023

Date: 12-12-2023
Business: None present for Plaintiff.
Advocate Girish Thakur present for Defendant no.1
Advocate Prachi Thakkar present for Defendant no.2.
Order - Plaintiff absent and failed to argue on the Notice of Motion No. 841 of 2018 which is 5 years old, hence Notice of Motion No. 841 of 2018 is dismissed for want of prosecution. Notice of Motion No. 841 of 2018 is disposed off.
Matter stands adjourned on 12-03-2024 for framing issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2024

Date: 12-03-2024
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. S. B. JOSHI JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
None for  plaintiff.
Adv. Nilesh Thakur for defendant No.1 present.
Adv. Prachi Thakkar for defendant No.2 present.
Due to formation of new court and change of assignment matter is adjourned.
Matter adjourned for framing issues  to 12-06-2024.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2024

Date: 12-06-2024
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. S. M. AGARKAR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
None for  plaintiff.
Adv. Girish Thakur for defendant No.1 present.
Adv. Vinisha Bhavnani i/b Jayakar  and Partners for defendant No.2 present.
On the request of both defendants matter adjourned for filing draft issues to 19-07-2024.
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2024

Date: 19-07-2024
Business: The Court is on Leave.
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2024

Date: 07-10-2024
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. R. D. DESHPANDE JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
None for plaintiff.
Adv. Pooja Yadav for defendant No.2 is present and seeks time to file draft issues.
None for defendant No.1.
Matter adjourned for filing draft issues to 09-12-2024.
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2024

Date: 09-12-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Girish Thakur for defendant No.1 is present and filed draft issues. TOR. O-seen and filed.
Adv. Kshitij Abbhi for defendant No.2 is present and filed draft issues. TOR. O-seen and filed.
Matter adjourned for settlement of issues to 10.02.2025.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 10-02-2025

Date: 10-02-2025
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 27-03-2025

Date: 27-03-2025
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2025

Date: 21-06-2025
Business: PO is on leave.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2025

Date: 02-08-2025
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Kshitij Abbhi for defendant No.2 is present.
Exh-06 - Issues framed.
Matter adjourned for filing affidavit of evidence and documents to 20.09.2025.
Next Purpose: FILING  AFFIDAVIT OF DOCUMENT
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2025

Date: 20-09-2025
Business: PO is on leave, hence matter is adjourned.
Next Purpose: FILING  AFFIDAVIT OF DOCUMENT
Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2025

Date: 14-11-2025
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. A. C. DAGA JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
None for plaintiff. Plaintiff has not filed affidavit of evidence.
None for defendant.
Matter adjourned for dismissal order to 09.01.2026.
                                                                                 Judge
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2026

Date: 09-01-2026
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. H. M. BHOSALE JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
None present.
K.B.
Later on at 11.30 a.m.
Adv. Victoria Gonsalves i/b Jayakar and Partners for defendant No.2 is present.
Matter adjourned for dismissal order to 25.02.2026.
                                                                                 Judge
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2026

Date: 25-02-2026
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. V. G. RAGHUWANSHI JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
K.B.
Later on at 1.48 p.m.
Plaintiff is absent and has not lead any evidence. It appears
that plaintiff is not interested in proceeding further with the suit. As such Suit No.380/2018 is dismissed in default.
                                                                                 Judge
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 25-02-2026

Additional Case Details

Filing Number: 101522/2018
Filing Date: 24-01-2018
First Hearing Date: 28th February 2018
Decision Date: 25th February 2026
Court Number And Judge: 61-COURT 61 ADDL  SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

Final Order 2

25 Feb 2026

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 61 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No.:SUIT/0100380/2018
Jyoti Prakash Karane Vs 1. Sanjay Sudam Mandlik 2. Shivraj Sudam
Mandlik
Date: 25-02-2026
Business : IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. V. G.
RAGHUWANSHI JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT
C.R. NO. 61
None for plaintiff. None for defendant. K.B.
Later on at 1.48 p.m. Plaintiff is absent and
has not lead any evidence. It appears that
plaintiff is not interested in proceeding
further with the suit. As such Suit
No.380/2018 is dismissed in default.
Nature of
Disposal
: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date : 25-02-2026
COURT 61 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

Interim Order 1

02 Aug 2025

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: S. C. Suit No. 380/2018 Issues Exh.6
IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI
SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO. 380 OF 2018
Jyoti Prakash Karane … Plaintiff
V/s.
Sanjay Sudam Mandlik and Another … Defendants
ISSUES
1. Whether Plaintiff proves that she is entitled to the joint
ownership/lease hold right in respect of suit premises bearing
Gala No.543, Meenatai Thackeray Flower Market, S. B. Marg,
Dadar (West)?
2. Whether Plaintiff proves that she is entitled to be add a partner in
the Suit Firm M/s. S. M. Caterers in place of deceased partner
Sudam Mandilk on same terms and conditions?
3. Whether in alternative, Plaintiff is entitled for dissolution of the
partner of the Suit Firm M/s. S. M. Caterers?
4. Whether suit is framed and filed as tenable?
5. Whether Plaintiff is entitled for relief as prayed?
6. What Order, Decree and Costs?
S/d
(A. C. Daga)
Date : 02.08.2025 Judge, City Civil Court,
Gr. Mumbai.
Court Room No.61.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order 2