Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 21 Aug 2019 · CNR MHCC010013902019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 N/M No. 539/2019 in Suit No. 1371/2017 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO.539 OF 2019 (CNR NO. MH CC010013902019) IN C.C. SUIT NO. 1371 OF 2017 (CNR NO. MH CC010113292016) Jagdish Shivram Pawar ].. Plaintiff. V/s. Prakash Shivram Pawar and others ]..Defendants Advocate Mr. R. R. Choudhary for defendant no.1. Advocate Ms. Renuka Pawar for the plaintiff. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE MS. S.P. PONKSHE. (C.R.NO.12) DATE : 21st AUGUST 2019 ORAL ORDER This Notice of Motion has been taken out by defendant no.1 for condonation of delay in filing written statement and for setting aside”No Written Statement” order passed on 10.102018 and for seeking permission to file written statement on record. 2 Defendant no.1 has filed affidavit in support of notice of motion, wherein he has stated that writ of summons has been served upon defendant no.1 on 06.04.2018. Further, he has averred that -- 1 of 4 -- 2 N/M No. 539/2019 in Suit No. 1371/2017 defendant no.1 was searching for an advocate and advocate had taken date from the Court on 20.04.2018 and again adjourned to 27.07.2018, but advocate failed to file written statement and started avoiding defendant no.1. Defendant no.1 realized that the said advocate is no more interested to appear. Therefore, defendant no.1 approached to another advocate and appointed another advocate. Due to said reason, defendant no.1 could not file written statement. It is further averred that defendant has a good case on merits and the principle of natural justice demands, defendant no.1 should be given opportunity to defend the present suit. Thus, prayed for allowing notice of motion. 3 The plaintiff has filed affidavit in reply and resisted notice of motion in toto. It is contended that defendant no.1 appeared on 20.04.2018 in the Court, but did not file written statement for reason best known to him The reasons stated by defendant no.1 are improper and against the provision of law. Hence, prayed for dismissal of notice of motion. 4 Heard, learned advocate for defendant no.1 and the learned advocate for the plaintiff. 5 It seems that defendant no.1 has filed this notice of motion through newly advocate appointed. It is urged by the learned advocate for the plaintiff that defendant no.1 has not tendered any correspondence with earlier advocate. Therefore, reason is not acceptable. But considering the facts that now defendant no.1 before the Court through new advocate and intends to defend the suit. In such peculiar circumstances, reason stated by defendant no.1 is sufficient to accept, so as to give opportunity to defendant no.1 in order to decide -- 2 of 4 -- 3 N/M No. 539/2019 in Suit No. 1371/2017 the suit on merits and real controversial issues between the parties on merits. If the present notice of motion is allowed, no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff. No doubt, there is delay on the part of defendant no.1 and it caused delay in the suit. Therefore, the plaintiff is to be compensated for said delay by imposing heavy costs upon defendant no.1, while allowing this notice of motion. Thus, notice of motion is to be allowed by imposing costs upon defendant no.1. With this, I proceed to pass the following order: ORDER 1 Notice of Motion No. 539 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a), (b) and (c) subject to payment of costs of Rs.3,500/ (Rupees Three Thousand Five Hundred only) payable by defendant no.1 to the plaintiff on or before next date. 2 On payment of costs, already tendered written statement by defendant no.1 along with notice of motion, be taken on record on the next date. 3 Failure to make compliance, notice of motion will be dismissed automatically. 4 Notice of Motion No 539 of 2019 stands disposed of accordingly. (S. P. PONKSHE) Judge, Date: 21/08/2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 21/08/2019 Transcribed on : 21/08/2019 Signed on : 22/08/2019 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 N/M No. 539/2019 in Suit No. 1371/2017 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 22/08/2019 At 4.50 p.m. MRS. SUPRIYA S.PAWAR UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ MS. S. P. PONKSHE (C.R.NO.12) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 21.08.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 22.08.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 22.08.2019 -- 4 of 4 --
