Skip to main content
TRANSFER APPL

M/s. B. N. Biscuit And Confectionery WorksVsMCGM +1 more

CNR MHCC01001348201819-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 30th January 2018

TrustJury record updated 08 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100017/2018
Registration Date
24 Jan 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-01-2018
    Business: Adv. Redekar for applicant present.
    Adv. A.V. Divate for respondent present.
    Adjd. to 30/01/2018 for order.
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 30-01-2018
    
    Date: 30-01-2018
    Business: Adv. Redekar for applicant present.
    Applicant sought transfer of L.C. Suit No.1251/2015 from C.R.No.6 to C.R.No.22 on the ground that the Presiding Officer kept the said suit for judgment and now the Presiding Officer is transferred to C.R.No.22.
    Respondent objected the transfer.
    Perusal of the application shows that the Presiding Officer of C.R.No.6 kept the said suit for judgment for almost five dates during 06/11/2017 to 16/01/2018. The arguments were heard in September 2017 i.e. prior to four months from today. After hearing the arguments, the judgment is to be passed at the earliest. In the instant case, as four mounths have already been lapsed, I do not think arguments will still be fresh in the mind of the Presiding Officer. Hence no substance in the application.
    The application stands rejected.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 30-01-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101479/2018
    Filing Date: 24-01-2018
    First Hearing Date: 25th January 2018
    Decision Date: 30th January 2018
    Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    30 Jan 2018
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 30/01/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
    MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA
    T.A. 17/18 Adv. Redekar for applicant present.
    Applicant sought transfer of L.C. Suit No.1251/2015 from
    C.R.No.6 to C.R.No.22 on the ground that the Presiding Officer
    kept the said suit for judgment and now the Presiding Officer is
    transferred to C.R.No.22.
    Respondent objected the transfer.
    Perusal of the application shows that the Presiding Officer of
    C.R.No.6 kept the said suit for judgment for almost five dates
    during 06/11/2017 to 16/01/2018. The arguments were heard
    in September 2017 i.e. prior to four months from today. After
    hearing the arguments, the judgment is to be passed at the
    earliest. In the instant case, as four mounths have already been
    lapsed, I do not think arguments will still be fresh in the mind of
    the Presiding Officer. Hence no substance in the application.
    The application stands rejected.
    Principal Judge,
    Gr. Mumbai.
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    30 Jan 2018
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 30/01/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
    MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA
    T.A. 17/18 Adv. Redekar for applicant present.
    Applicant sought transfer of L.C. Suit No.1251/2015 from
    C.R.No.6 to C.R.No.22 on the ground that the Presiding Officer
    kept the said suit for judgment and now the Presiding Officer is
    transferred to C.R.No.22.
    Respondent objected the transfer.
    Perusal of the application shows that the Presiding Officer of
    C.R.No.6 kept the said suit for judgment for almost five dates
    during 06/11/2017 to 16/01/2018. The arguments were heard
    in September 2017 i.e. prior to four months from today. After
    hearing the arguments, the judgment is to be passed at the
    earliest. In the instant case, as four mounths have already been
    lapsed, I do not think arguments will still be fresh in the mind of
    the Presiding Officer. Hence no substance in the application.
    The application stands rejected.
    Principal Judge,
    Gr. Mumbai.
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.