Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHCC01001341201803 Apr 2018
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 03 Apr 2018 · CNR MHCC010013412018

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: NM 339/2018 IN SUIT NO.8414/2000 1
CNR NO.MHCC01 0013412018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.339 OF 2018
IN
SUIT NO. 8414 OF 2000
M/s. Kwality Food & Masala Products .. .. Plaintiff
V/s.
Ahura Mazda Dairy Farm Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. .. .. Defendants
Advocate Shri.Gogari for the Plaintiff.
Coram : Her Honour Judge
Smt. Pushpa N. Rao
Ad hoc Asst.Judge
CR No. : 32
Dated : 3rd April,2018
ORDER
1. Applicant Marol Dudh Utpadak Welfare Association taken out this
motion for recalling order dated 13/12/2017 .
2. The contention of the applicant is that applicants are the
depositors and investors association. The criminal case has been
registered under MPID Act and the property has been seized by police.
Applicants had filed the Notice of motion for impleading them as a
party in the suit. On 13/12/2017 the advocate of the applicant was not
present when the matter was called out, therefore, in the interest of
justice the order dated 13/12/2017 be recalled.
-- 1 of 4 --
NM 339/2018 IN SUIT NO.8414/2000 2
3. Plaintiff filed the reply that the notice of motion is filed by the
applicant only with intention to delay the matter. Time and again such
futile attempts are made by the applicant wasting precious time of this
court, hence, notice of motion be dismissed with costs.
4. Inspite of the opportunity given to the learned advocate
Shri.Holamagi for the applicant on 28/02/2018,
06/3/2018,09/03/2018 and 23/03/2018 failed to appear before the
court when the matter is called out for hearing. It also observed by this
court that when matter is called out applicant/advocate remained
absent and appeared before the court at about 5.30p.m. Therefore, it
appears that applicants advocate is not interested for hearing, hence,
matter is taken up for order after the argument of learned advocate
Shri.Gogari for plaintiff.
5. After perusal of the record and proceeding, I found that applicant
had taken out Chamber Summons No. 1443/2010. The said Chamber
Summons was dismissed by order dated 17.06.2011. It has been
observed in the said order that the applicants has no interest in the suit
property. Of course the possession claimed by the plaintiff in the suit
would be subject to the orders passed in the criminal prosecution under
the M.P.I.D.Act so as no order or judgment is passed in this suit.
Applicants association as such by virtue running the business cannot
heard in the suit upon the plaintiff's claim as the plaintiff's suit is for
declaration of an agreement dated 02.07.1998 between the plaintiff and
defendant is duly terminated and consequently with the relief of the
possession of the factory building of the defendant and other ancillary
reliefs.
-- 2 of 4 --
NM 339/2018 IN SUIT NO.8414/2000 3
6. Again applicants had taken out Chamber Summons
No. 1375/2013 with the identical prayer, that Chamber Summons was
dismissed by order dated 02.09.2013. The earlier orders passed in the
matter clearly indicates that the motion of the applicants to implead
them as a party was already dismissed. Therefore, applicants have no
locus standi to ask for recalling the order dated 13/12/2017.
7. Plaintiff has already filed evidence close pursis on 12/09/2014
and matter is for final argument. The notice of motion of the applicant
is nothing but the abuse of process of law. The conduct of the applicant
is nothing but to file the motion only with intention to protract the trial,
hence, notice of motion is deserves to be dismissed with costs,.
8. In view of the above discussions, I pass the following order:
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.339/2018 is dismissed with costs.
Dated :03.04.2018 (Pushpa N. Rao)
Ad hoc Asst.Judge
Bombay City Civil Court
Greater Mumbai
Dictation direct typed on computer on: 03.04.2018
Sign by HHJ on : 03.04.2018
-- 3 of 4 --
NM 339/2018 IN SUIT NO.8414/2000 4
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER”.
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
05/04/2018 at (3.40 p.m.) Mrs. J.V.Pawar
Name of the Judge (With Court room
No.)
HHJ Smt.Pushpa N Rao
C.R.No.32
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ORDER
03/04/2018
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 03/04/2018
JUDGMENT/ ORDER uploaded on 05/04/2018
.
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.