Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Mr. Kantilal Bastimal JodhavatVsPriya Dinesh Solanki

CNR MHCC010012952020966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 27th January 2021

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100082/2020
Registration Date
29 Jan 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Kantilal Bastimal Jodhavat

    Respondent

    1. 1Priya Dinesh Solanki

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 11-02-2020
Business: Parties and Advocate absent,  adjd to 12/02/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2020

Date: 12-02-2020
Business: Parties and Advocate absent,  adjd to 21/02/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2020

Date: 21-02-2020
Business: Shri B.S.Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  Shri Patil prays for issue of Warrant u/o.XXI, Rule 48 of CPC, without issue of notice, stating that the Execution Application is filed within two years of passing of Decree.  Hence, issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 20/06/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2020

Date: 20-06-2020
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 24-07-2020

Date: 24-07-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2020

Date: 17-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 28-10-2020

Date: 28-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2020

Date: 15-12-2020
Business: Parties and advocate are absent adjourned to 27/01/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 27-01-2021

Date: 27-01-2021
Business: Parties and advocates are absent.
Record shows that the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has already been issued and hence, it will be appropriate to dispose of the present Execution Application by keeping alive the said warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC and by granting liberty to plaintiff to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree, with further liberty to plaintiff to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary.
In view of this, present Execution Application stands disposed off by keeping alive the warrant U/o.XXI, Rule 48 issued in the matter, till full satisfaction of the decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC, with liberty as stated above.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 27-01-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100862/2020
Filing Date: 29-01-2020
First Hearing Date: 11th February 2020
Decision Date: 27th January 2021
Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.