Interim Order 1

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 1 MA 6/18 (Misc. Apl.94/17)
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 6 OF 2018
(C.N.R. No.MHCC010012942018)
IN
MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 94/2017
Santosh Kumar Mishra
S/o. Shri Ghanshyam Mishra
Aged about 42 years,
Temporarily residing at
R. No.211, Himgiri Lodge,
4A, N. G. Acharya Marg,
Chembur, Mumbai – 400 071 … Applicant
Versus
1] Union of India
Through the Secretary to the
Government of India,
Department of Atomic Energy (DAE),
Anushakti Bhavan, Chatrapati
Shivaji Maharaj (C.S.M.) Marg,
Mumbai – 400 001
2] The Director,
Director of Construction,
Services & Estate Management
(DCSEM), Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan (VSB),
Anushaktinagar, Mumbai – 400 094
3] The Estate Officer and Chief Administrative
Officer (CAO), Director of Construction,
Services & Estate Management (DCSEM),
Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan (VSB),
Anushaktinagar, Mumbai – 400 094
4] The Under Secretary
Department of Atomic Energy (DAE),
Anushakti Bhavan, Chatrapati Shivaji
Maharj (C.S.M.) Marg,
Mumbai – 400 001
-- 1 of 3 --
2 MA 6/18 (Misc. Apl.94/17)
5] The Assistant Personnel Officer (APO),
Recovery Section, Directorate of
Construction, Services & Estate
Management (DCSEM), Vikram Sarabhai
Bhavan (VSB), Anushaktinagar,
Mumbai – 400 094 … Respondents
Appearance :
Applicant in person
None for the respondents
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. U. M. PADWAD
(COURT ROOM No.54)
DATED : 10/07/2018
O R D E R
. Perused the application and record. Heard both sides.
2] The applicant has filed several applications in
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 94/2017 such as Stay Application No.
66/2017, Misc. Applications Nos. 64/2017, 84/2017 and 91/2017. He
submits that he wants to make certain amendments to the verification
made to all those applications to elaborate his reliance on the contents
of the respective applications. The amendment as proposed is rather
explanatory and does not cause any change in nature of the proceeding.
Before considering those applications on merit it is desirable that the
applications be verified as desired by the applicant. It is necessary also
because the applicant shall be responsible for each and every contention
made in those applications. The interest of justice thus requires a fair
opportunity to the applicant to amend the verification as prayed for.
3] However, since the amendment as proposed in the
schedule of the amendment is quite lengthy, the applicant is directed to
file a separate affidavit in lieu of incorporating the amendment as
-- 2 of 3 --
3 MA 6/18 (Misc. Apl.94/17)
proposed. The affidavit so filed shall be treated as the amended
verification statement of the applicant to all those applications.
Applicant to comply till 13/07/2018.
4] The application to the extent of prayer clause (d) is
disposed of and shall be heard about remaining prayer clauses.
Date : 10/07/2018 ( U. M. Padwad )
Judge City Civil Court,
Gr. Mumbai.
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED ORDER.”
13/07/2018 at 12:05 p.m. V. V. Kulkarni
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court
room no.)
H.H.J. Shri. U. M. Padwad
(C. R. No.54)
Date of Pronouncement of ORDER 10/07/2018
ORDER signed by P. O. on 11/07/2018
ORDER uploaded on 13/07/2018
-- 3 of 3 --