Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHCC01001254201816 Feb 2022
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 16 Feb 2022 · CNR MHCC010012542018

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: MHCC010012542018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL C0URT AT BOMBAY
ORDER BELOW EXH.-02
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 343 OF 2018
CNR No. MHCC010012542018
Conde Nast (India) Pvt. Ltd.
A Company incorporated under the
provisions of the Companies Act,
1956 having their Registered Office at 2nd
Floor, , Darabshaw House, Ballard Easte,
Shoorji Vallabhdas Marg, Mumbai- 400 001.
... Plaintiff
V/s.
Pinxit Blue Advertising Pvt. Ltd.
A Company incorporated under the provisions
of the companies Act, 1956 having their
Registered office at 2nd Floor, Super Processors
Compound, Lalbaug Industrial Estate, Lalbaug,
Mumbai- 400 012.
... Defendants
Appearance:-
Adv. D.S. Doshi for the Plaintiff.
-- 1 of 4 --
2 Sum. Suit No.343/2018
CORAM : HER HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE
SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR
CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY
(C.R. NO.61).
DATE : 16.2.2022
ORDER BELOW EXH.02
Plaintiff’s authorized person namely Mr. Vinayak
Shetye is present with his advocate Shri D.S.Doshi. The copy of
resolution passed by the plaintiff company is filed on record. It is
verified from the original. He moved this application for
withdrawal of suit. It is orally stated by the plaintiff and his
advocate that the plaintiff wants to withdraw the suit voluntarily.
Defendant remained absent . Withdrawal application is served on
the defendant. The plaintiff has filed pursis to that effect below
Exh.3. The defendant neither appeared nor filed reply to the
withdrawal application.
2. It appears that the plaintiff wants to withdraw the suit
voluntarily and the defendants failed to file reply to the
withdrawal application. Hence, the suit may be allowed to be
withdrawn.
3. Considering the aforesaid discussion I proceed to pass
following order:
-- 2 of 4 --
3 Sum. Suit No.343/2018
ORDER
1.Application Exh.02 is allowed
2. Permission granted to the plaintiff for withdrawal of suit.
3. Necessary order is passed below Exh.01.
Date: 16.2.2022.
(A.H.KASHIKAR)
AD-HOC Judge,
City Civil Court,
Gr.Mumbai.
(Court Room No.61)
Dictated on :16.2.2022
Typed on : 16.2.2022
Signed on : 16.2.2022
-- 3 of 4 --
4 Sum. Suit No.343/2018
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
17.2.2022 10.45 a.m p.m. ( K.M. Rana )
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court
room No.)
HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar (C.R.No.61)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ORDER
16.2.2022
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by
P.O.on
16.2.2022
JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 17.2.2022
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.