Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHCC01001206201807 Feb 2018
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 07 Feb 2018 · CNR MHCC010012062018

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: Draft NM. : 1 : L.C.Suit .No.224/2018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY
DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION
IN
L.C.SUIT NO. 224 OF 2018.
Deepak Mulji Chandarana } .. Plaintiff.
Versus.
The Designated Officer,
Asstt. Engineer (Bldg. & Factory) }
Office of F/North Ward & Ors.. } .. Defendants.
Ld. Advocate Mr. P.D.Gandhy for the Plaintiff.
Ld. Advocate Mr.Sutar h/f. Mrs. Chavan for Defendant /BMC.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI. G.B.GURAO
DATE : 07 TH FEBRUARY, 2018.
(Court Room No.06)
O R D E R
1. Plaintiff has taken out this draft notice of motion to restrain the
defendant/Corporation, its officers or anybody on behalf of defendant
from taking any action pursuant to the notice dated 18 /09/2017 and
order dated 15/01/2018.
2. Facts of the present case in brief are as under :
Plaintiff is the Lessee of the suit premises. Suit premises is situate
in Sindhi Colony, Sion (W), Mumbai bearing Block No. 14/A/1.
Defendant/Corporation is the owner of the suit premises and Lessor of
the plaintiff. The usual documents are executed between the plaintiff
and defendant. The suit premises consist ground plus 1 upper and part
second floor structure. Plaintiff is in occupation of the same since last
several years. However, Corporation issued notice to the plaintiff dated
18/09/2017 to remove the structure. Plaintiff replied the same. But
-- 1 of 4 --
Draft NM. : 2 : L.C.Suit .No.224/2018
Corporation did not consider the documents of plaintiff and passed
order dated 15/01/2018 and thereby directed to demolish the notice
structure. It is alleged that plaintiff paid the taxes of the same. Plaintiff
has taken electric supply in the suit premises. Thus, prayed to grant ad
interim relief.
3. Notice served on the defendant. The defendant filed an affidavit
of its officer Vikram Somwanshi and also documents.
4. I have heard Shri. P. D. Gandhy advocate for plaintiff and Smt.
Valvi advocate for defendant/Corporation.
5. I have perused the documents on record.
6. The defendant has given notice to plaintiff to demolish the
structure. The structure is the suit premises. It is to be noted that from
the perusal of tax receipt, it reveals that the suit premises consist one
first floor as described in the plaint. The plaintiff has also taken electric
connection in the suit premises. Defendant asked plaintiff to furnish the
documents. However, it is to be noted that the defendant is the Lessor
and owner of the suit premises. Therefore, the entire documents must
have available with the defendant. Except the notice order and
inspection report, defendant did not produce any other documents.
There are triable issues between the parties. Hence, in such a
circumstances, I find that plaintiff is entitled for the relief of adinterim
injunction. Therefore, the following order :
-- 2 of 4 --
Draft NM. : 3 : L.C.Suit .No.224/2018
O r d e r
1. Defendant, it's agent, servant or anybody on
behalf of defendant are hereby restrained from taking
any action on the basis of impugned notice and order
till next date
2. Notice of Motion be registered.
Date : 07.02.2018. (G.B.Gurao)
Judge,
City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay.
Dictated on : 07.02.2018
Typed on : 07.02.2018
Signed by HHJ. : 07.02.2018
-- 3 of 4 --
Draft NM. : 4 : L.C.Suit .No.224/2018
“ CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
13.02.2018 /4.30 p.m. Mr. S.D.Nalawade
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
(H.G.)
Name of the Judge (with
Court Room No.)
Shri. G.B.Gurao
(CR.No.06)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGEMENT/ORDER
07.02.2018
JUDGEMENT/ORDER signed
by P.O. on
07.02.2018
JUDGEMENT/ORDER
uploaded on
13.02.2018 .
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.