Skip to main content
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT

Prakashchand Chunilal SakariaVsAnkit Industries +1 more

CNR MHCC01001204201859-Court 59 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DECREED
Decision Date: 18th March 2021

TrustJury record updated 08 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100282/2018
Registration Date
01 Mar 2018

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-04-2018
    Business: Both parties and Adv absent.
    Later on
    Adv. Mr. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    None for the defendant.
    Matter is adj. to 02/08/2018 for direction.
    Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2018
    
    Date: 02-08-2018
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain  for Plaintiff present.
    None for Defendant
    Advocate for plaintiff seeks time for filing service report hence,
    Matter is adjd. to 15/11/2018 for Service.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2018
    
    Date: 15-11-2018
    Business: Matter transferred from Cr. no.28.
    Both parties and their counsel absent.
    Adj. For Service affidavit and Steps on 25/01/2019.
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2019
    
    Date: 25-01-2019
    Business: As P.O. is on Leave
    Matter is Adjd for Affidavit of Service on 5/3/19
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2019
    
    Date: 05-03-2019
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2019
    
    Date: 12-06-2019
    Business: Plaintiff absent.
    Defendant absent.
    Advocate  for plaintiff absent.
    Advocate for defendant absent.
    LO. At 5.00p.m.
    Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Ramesh Jain filed affidavit of Prakashchand Chunilal Sakaria the plaintiff abovenames in support of his claim.
    List of documents.
    Non appearance certificate.
    Affidavit of service.
    Matter adjd to 12.07.2019 for affidavit of service.
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 12-07-2019
    
    Date: 12-07-2019
    Business: As the court is on leave
    Board is discharged and the
    matter stands adjd. To 06.08.2019
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2019
    
    Date: 06-08-2019
    Business: P.O. is on training. Hence, matter adjd for...
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 26-09-2019
    
    Date: 26-09-2019
    Business: P.O. is on leave Board is discharged
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-12-2019
    
    Date: 18-12-2019
    Business: None present.
    Matter adjourned for service to 18/03/2020
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-03-2020
    
    Date: 18-03-2020
    Business: As per Corona Virus Circular dated on 16.03.2020.
    Hence matter is adjd to 25.06.2020 for Service
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-06-2020
    
    Date: 25-06-2020
    Business: Due to Covid -19 lock down
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2020
    
    Date: 11-08-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2020
    
    Date: 15-10-2020
    Business: Due to Covid-19 Lockdown
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-01-2021
    
    Date: 18-01-2021
    Business: Court is on Leave.
    Matter is adjd to 12.03.2021 for Service.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2021
    
    Date: 12-03-2021
    Business: Plaintiff absent.
    Defendant and his advocate are absent.
    Adv. Ramesh Jain for plff present.
    Adv. For the plff. state that affidavit service and documents already filed on dt. 12.06.2019. but, ex-parte order was not passed. Hence, the ex-parte order passed today.
    Ex-parte order passed below Exh-1
    Order - Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 duely served with suit summons but failed to appear. Hence suit to proceed ex-parte against the defendant Nos. 1 and 2.
    Arguments heard.
    Matter is adjd to 18.03.2021 for ex-parte judgment.
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 18-03-2021
    
    Date: 18-03-2021
    Business: Plaintiff absent.
    Adv. Ramesh Jain for plff. Present.
    Argument heard.
    Judgment Exh-7
    For reason separately recorded following order is passed.
    ORDER
    1. The defendants shall pay Rs.1,25,206.55ps.(Rs. One Lakh Twenty Five Thousand Two Hundred Six and Fifty Five  Paise Only) to the plaintiff with interest on principal amount of Rs.99,569/- at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization.
    2. Defendants do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
    3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per rule.
    4. Decree be drawn accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: DECREED
    Disposal Date: 18-03-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101298/2018
    Filing Date: 22-01-2018
    First Hearing Date: 25th April 2018
    Decision Date: 18th March 2021
    Court Number And Judge: 59-Court 59 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1Full order available
    18 Mar 2021

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010012042018 Filed on :22.01.2018 Registered On :01.03.2018 Decided on :18/03/2021 Duration :Y-03/M-01/D-28 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.282 OF 2018 Exhibit-7 Prakashchand Chunilal Sakaria Age 61 years of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant carrying on business as a sole proprietor in the name and style of Max-India Silk Industries at and from 56/72 Dadi Seth Agairy Lane, Manahar Building 3rd floor, Mumbai-400 002 ….Plaintiff Vs. 1.Ankit Industries A…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    18 Mar 2021

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010012042018 Filed on :22.01.2018 Registered On :01.03.2018 Decided on :18/03/2021 Duration :Y-03/M-01/D-28 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.282 OF 2018 Exhibit-7 Prakashchand Chunilal Sakaria Age 61 years of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant carrying on business as a sole proprietor in the name and style of Max-India Silk Industries at and from 56/72 Dadi Seth Agairy Lane, Manahar Building 3rd floor, Mumbai-400 002 ….Plaintiff Vs. 1.Ankit Industries A…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.